The death of a spouse is an extremely stressful life event that consequently causes a large drop in life satisfaction. Reactivity to the loss, however, varies markedly, a phenomenon that is currently not well understood. Because lack of controllability essentially contributes to the stressful nature of this incident, the authors analyzed whether individual differences in belief in external control influence the coping process. To examine this issue, widowed individuals (N = 414) from a large-scaled panel study were followed for the 4 years before and after the loss by using a latent growth model. Results showed that belief in external control led to a considerably smaller decline in life satisfaction and higher scores in the year of the loss. Thus, although usually regarded as a risk factor, belief in external control seems to act as a protective factor for coping with the death of a spouse.
BenassiV. A.SweeneyP. D.DufourC. L. (1988). Is there a relationship between locus of control orientation and depression?Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97, 357–367.
2.
BollenK. A.CurranP. J. (2006). Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
3.
BonannoG. A. (2009). The other side of sadness: What the new science of bereavement tells us about life after loss. New York, NY: Basic Books.
4.
BonannoG. A.FieldN. P. (2001). Examining the delayed grief hypothesis across 5 years of bereavement. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 798–816.
5.
CarverC. S. (1997). The Internal-External Scale confounds internal locus of control with expectancies of positive outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 580–585.
6.
CoifmanK. G.BonannoG. A.RayR. D.GrossJ. J. (2007). Does repressive coping promote resilience? Affective-autonomic response discrepancy during bereavement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 745–758.
7.
CoombsW. N.SchroederH. E. (1988). Generalized locus of control: An analysis of factor analytic data. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 79–85.
8.
DeNeveK. M.CooperH. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 197–229.
9.
EllisonC. G. (1991). Religious involvement and subjective well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 32, 80–99.
10.
FolkmanS. (1984). Personal control and stress and coping processes: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 839–852.
11.
HolmesT. H.RaheR. H. (1967). The social readjustment rating scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11, 213–218.
12.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453.
13.
LazarusR. S.FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York, NY: Springer.
14.
LucasR. E. (2007a). Adaptation and the set-point model of subjective well-being: Does happiness change after major life events?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 75–80.
15.
LucasR. E. (2007b). Long-term disability is associated with lasting changes in subjective well-being: Evidence from two nationally representative longitudinal studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 717–730.
16.
LucasR. E.ClarkA. E.GeorgellisY.DienerE. (2003). Reexamining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: Reactions to changes in marital status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 527–539.
17.
ManciniA. D.BonannoG. A. (2009). Predictors and parameters of resilience to loss: Toward an individual differences model. Journal of Personality, 77, 1805–1831.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2007). Mplus user’s guide. (5th ed.) Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
20.
NorenzayanA.LeeA. (2010). It was meant to happen: Explaining cultural variations in fate attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 702–720.
21.
ProciukT. J.BreenL. J. (1975). Defensive externality and its relation to academic performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 549–556.
22.
RotterJ. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80, 1–28.
23.
StillmanT. F.BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D.LambertN. M.FinchamF. D.BrewerL. E. (2010). Personal philosophy and personnel achievement: Belief in free will predicts better job performance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 43–50.
24.
StroebeM. S.FolkmanS.HanssonR. O.SchutH. (2006). The prediction of bereavement outcome: Development of an integrative risk factor framework. Social Science & Medicine, 63, 2440–2451.
25.
TaylorS. E.KemenyM. E.ReedG. M.BowerJ. E.GruenewaldT. L. (2000). Psychological resources, positive illusions, and health. American Psychologist, 55, 99–109.
26.
WagnerG. G.FrickJ. R.SchuppJ. (2007). The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP)—Scope, evolution and enhancements. Journal of Applied Social Science Studies, 127, 139–169.
27.
WortmanC. B.SheedyC.GluhoskiV.KesslerR. (1992). Stress, coping, and health: Conceptual issues and directions for future research. In FriedmanH. S. (Ed.), Hostility, coping, and health (pp. 227–256). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
