Evaluations of handwritten essays or exams are often suspected of being biased, such as by mood states or individual predilections. Although most of these influences are unsystematic, at least one bias is problematic because it systematically affects evaluations of handwritten materials. Three experiments revealed that essays in legible as compared to less legible handwriting were evaluated more positively. This robust finding was related to a basic judgmental mechanism that builds on the fluency with which handwriting can be processed. The present research further revealed that this evaluative bias is not inevitable but can be controlled for. Given the importance of evaluations based on handwritten work samples for individual success throughout school, college, university, and work life, it is important for individuals to be aware of this bias.
AlterA. L.OppenheimerD. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(3):219–235.
2.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6):1173–1182.
3.
BayneR.O'NeillF. (1988). Handwriting and personality: A test of some expert graphologists' judgements. Guidance & Assessment Review, 4(4):1–3.
4.
Ben-ShakharG.Bar-HillelM.BiluY.Ben-AbbaE.FlugA. (1986). Can graphology predict occupational success? Two empirical studies and some methodological ruminations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(4):645–653.
5.
BriggsD. (1970). The influence of handwriting on assessment. Educational Research, 13(1):50–55.
6.
CloreG. L.WyerR. S.DienesB. P. A.GasperK.GohmC.IsbellL. (2001). Affective feelings as feedback: Some cognitive consequences. In MartinL. L.CloreG. L. (Eds.), Theories of mood and cognition: A user's guidebook (pp. 27–62). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
DechêneA.StahlC.HansenJ.WänkeM. (in press). The truth about the truth: A meta-analytic review of the truth-effect. Personality and Social Psychology Review.
8.
DionK.BerscheidE.WalsterE. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3):285–290.
9.
GreifenederR.BlessH. (2008). Depression and reliance on ease-of-retrieval experiences. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(2):213–230.
10.
GreifenederR.BlessH. (in press). The fate of activated information in impression formation: Fluency of concept activation moderates the emergence of assimilation versus contrast. British Journal of Social Psychology.
11.
GreifenederR.BlessH.PhamM. T. (in press). When do people rely on affective and cognitive feelings in judgment? A review. Personality and Social Psychology Review.
12.
HansenJ.WänkeM. (2008). It's the difference that counts: Expectancy/experience discrepancy moderates the use of ease of retrieval in attitude judgments. Social Cognition, 26, 447–468.
13.
HigginsE. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In HigginsE. T.KruglanskiA. W. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133–168). New York, NY: Guilford.
14.
HughesD. C.KeelingB.TuckB. F. (1983). Effects of achievement expectations and handwriting quality on scoring essays. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20(1):65–70.
15.
JamesH. W. (1929). The effect of handwriting upon grading. English Journal, 16(3):180–185.
16.
KleinJ.TaubD. (2005). The effect of variations in handwriting and print on evaluation of student essays. Assessing Writing, 10, 134–148.
17.
LandyD.SigallH. (1974). Beauty is talent: Task evaluation as a function of the performer's physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(3):299–304.
18.
MarkhamL. R. (1976). Influences of handwriting quality on teacher evaluation of written work. American Educational Research Journal, 13(4):277–283.
19.
NeterE.Ben-ShakharG. (1989). The predictive validity of graphological inferences: A meta-analytic approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 10(7):737–745.
20.
OppenheimerD. M. (2004). Spontaneous discounting of availability in frequency judgment tasks. Psychological Science, 15(2):100–105.
21.
ReberR.SchwarzN. (1999). Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth. Consciousness and Cognition, 8(3):338–342.
22.
ReberR.WinkielmanP.SchwarzN. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9(1):45–48.
23.
SchwarzN. (2002). Situated cognition and the wisdom in feelings: Cognitive tuning. In BarrettL. F.SaloveyP. (Eds.), The wisdom in feeling: Psychological processes in emotional intelligence (pp. 144–166). New York, NY: Guilford.
24.
SchwarzN. (2004). Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(4):332–348.
25.
SchwarzN.BlessH.StrackF.KlumppG.Rittenauer-SchatkaH.SimonsA. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2):195–202.
26.
SchwarzN.CloreG. L. (2007). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In HigginsE. T.KruglanskiA. W. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 385–407). New York, NY: Guilford.
27.
SchwarzN.SongH.XuJ. (2008). When thinking is difficult: Metacognitive experiences as information. In WänkeM. (Ed.), Social psychology of consumer behavior (pp. 201–223). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
28.
SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P.FongG. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6):845–851.
29.
StrackF.SchwarzN.BlessH.KüblerA.WänkeM. (1993). Awareness of the influence as a determinant of assimilation versus contrast. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23(1):53–62.
30.
UnkelbachC. (2006). The learned interpretation of cognitive fluency. Psychological Science, 17(4):339–345.
31.
UnkelbachC. (2007). Reversing the truth effect: Learning the interpretation of processing fluency in judgments of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 33, 219–230.
32.
WänkeM.BohnerG.JurkowitschA. (1997). There are many reasons to drive a BMW: Does imagined ease of argument generation influence attitudes?Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2):170–177.
