Signal amplification bias, the tendency to overestimate how much one’s behavior conveys internal states, has been theorized to negatively affect relationships. The present study is the first to test whether signal amplification has negative consequences in close relationships and whether this form of miscommunication is more detrimental to lower self-esteem individuals, who doubt their partner’s regard. Dating couples participated in a lab-induced social support interaction. Results supported predictions, revealing that when lower self-esteem support seekers overestimated how much they conveyed, they rated their partners' responses as less supportive than higher self-esteem support seekers who also engaged in signal amplification. Yet self-esteem did not predict perceptions of a partner’s supportiveness when impressions exceeded metaperceptions. These results highlight the role of self-esteem in understanding implications for miscommunication and for targeting interventions.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
AnthonyD. B.WoodJ. V.HolmesJ. G. (2007). Testing sociometer theory: Self-esteem and the importance of acceptance for social decision-making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 425–432.
3.
BarreraM. (1986). Distinctions between social support concepts, measures, and models. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 413–445.
4.
BaumeisterR. F.CampbellJ. D.KruegerJ. I.VohsK. D. (2003). Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles?Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4(1):1–44.
5.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.
6.
BaumeisterR. F.TiceD. M.HuttonD. G. (1989). Self-presentational motivations and personality differences in self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 57, 547–579.
7.
CameronJ. J.VorauerJ. D. (2008). Feeling transparent: On metaperceptions and miscommunications. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1093–1108.
8.
CohenS.WillsT. (1985). Stress, social support and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357.
9.
CollinsN. L.FeeneyB. C. (2000). A safe haven: An attachment theory perspective on support seeking and caregiving in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1053–1073.
10.
DavisM. H.MorrisM. M.KrausL. A. (1998). Relationship-specific and global perceptions of social support: Associations with well-being and attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 468–481.
11.
EidlesonR. J.EpsteinN. (1982). Cognition and relationship maladjustment: Development of a measure of dysfunctional relationship beliefs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 715–720.
12.
FeinS.SpencerS. J. (1997). Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 31–44.
13.
GalaugherT. C.RobinsonK. J.CameronJ. J. (2009, April). Motivations for behaving badly: Self-protection goals as a mediator of insecurity and destructive relationship behaviours. Paper presented at the Annual Prairie Undergraduate Conference, Winnipeg, Canada.
14.
GilovichT.KrugerJ.SavitskyK. (1999). Everyday egocentrism and everyday interpersonal problems. In KowalskiR. M.LearyM. R. (Eds.), The social psychology of emotional and behavioral problems: Interfaces of social and clinical psychology (pp. 69–95). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
15.
GilovichT.SavitskyK.MedvecV. H. (1998). The illusion of transparency: Biased assessments of others' ability to read one’s emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 332–346.
16.
GriffinD.MurrayS.GonzalezR. (1999). Difference score correlations in relationship research: A conceptual primer. Personal Relationships, 6, 505–518.
17.
HendrickS. S.HendrickC.AdlerN. L. (1988). Romantic relationships: Love, satisfaction, and staying together. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 980–988.
18.
HolmesJ. G. (1991). Trust and the appraisal process in close relationships. In JonesW. H.PerlmanD. (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (pp. 57–104). Oxford, UK: Jessica Kingsley.
19.
LakeyB.LutzC. J. (1996). Social support and preventive and therapeutic interventions. In PierceG. R.SarasonB. R.SarasonI. G. (Eds.), Handbook of social support and the family. Plenum series on stress and coping (pp. 435–465). New York: Plenum.
20.
LaurenceauJ.BarrettL. F.PietromonacoP. R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1238–1251.
21.
LearyM. R.BaumeisterR. F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 1–62). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
22.
LearyM. R.CottrellC. A.PhillipM. (2001). Deconfounding the effects of dominance and social acceptance on self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 898–909.
23.
LearyM. R.TamborE. S.TerdalS. K.DownsD. L. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 518–530.
24.
MarigoldD. C.HolmesJ. G.RossM. R. (2007). More than words: Reframing compliments from romantic partners fosters security in low self-esteem individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 232–248.
25.
MurrayS. L.BellaviaG.RoseR.GriffinD. (2003). Once hurt, twice hurtful: How perceived regard regulates daily marital interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 126–147.
26.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.CollinsN. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 642–666.
27.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.GriffinD. W. (1996). The self-fulfilling nature of positive illusions in romantic relationships: Love is not blind, but prescient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1155–1180.
28.
ReisH.ClarkM.HolmesJ. G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In MashekD.AronA. (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 201–228). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
ReisH.ShaverP. R. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In DuckS.HayD. F.HobfallS. E.IckesW.MontgomeryB. M. (Eds.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research, and interventions (pp. 367–389). Oxford, UK: John Wiley.
30.
RobinsonK. J.CameronJ. J. (2009, February). Nothing to lose, much to gain? Boosting relationship satisfaction for low self-esteem individuals. Poster presented at the 10th annual convention of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Tampa, FL.
31.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
SarasonB. R.SarasonI. G.PierceG. R. (1990). Social support: An interactional view. New York: John Wiley.
33.
StinsonD. B.LogelC.ZannaM. P.HolmesJ. G.CameronJ. J.WoodJ. V. (2008). The cost of lower self-esteem: Testing a self-and-social-bonds model of health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 412–428.
34.
VorauerJ. D.CameronJ. J. (2002). So close yet so far: Does collectivism foster transparency overestimation?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1344–1352.
35.
VorauerJ. D.CameronJ. J.HolmesJ. G.PearceD. G. (2003). Invisible overtures: Fears of rejection and the amplification bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 793–812.
36.
VorauerJ. D.RossM. (1999). Self-awareness and feeling transparent: Failing to suppress one’s self. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 415–440.
37.
YzerbytV. Y.MullerD.JuddC. M. (2004). Adjusting researchers' approach to adjustment: On the use of covariates when testing interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 424–431.
