Do philosophic views affect job performance? The authors found that possessing a belief in free will predicted better career attitudes and actual job performance. The effect of free will beliefs on job performance indicators were over and above well-established predictors such as conscientiousness, locus of control, and Protestant work ethic. In Study 1, stronger belief in free will corresponded to more positive attitudes about expected career success. In Study 2, job performance was evaluated objectively and independently by a supervisor. Results indicated that employees who espoused free will beliefs were given better work performance evaluations than those who disbelieve in free will, presumably because belief in free will facilitates exerting control over one’s actions.
BarrickM. R.MountM. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.
2.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.MuravenM.TiceD. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252–1265.
3.
BaumeisterR. F.MasicampoE. J.DeWallC. N. (2009). Prosocial benefits of feeling free: Disbelief in free will increases aggression and reduces helpfulness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 260–268.
4.
BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D.TiceD. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 396–403.
5.
BrownK. G.LeH.SchmidtF. L. (2006). Specific aptitude theory revisited: Is there incremental validity for training performance?. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14, 87–100.
6.
DienerE.EmmonsR. A.LarsenR. J.GriffinS. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.
7.
FurnhamA. (1990). A content, correlational, and factor analytic study of seven questionnaire measures of the Protestant work ethic. Human Relations, 43, 383–399.
8.
GailliotM. T.BaumeisterR. F.DeWallC. N.ManerJ. K.PlantE. A.TiceD. M. (2007). Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: Willpower is more than a metaphor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 325–336.
9.
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528.
10.
HunterJ. E. (1983). The prediction of job performance in the military using ability composites: The dominance of general cognitive ability over specific attitudes (Department of Defense Contract F41689-83-C-0025). Chandler, AZ: Research Applications.
11.
JudgeT. A. (2009). Core self-evaluations and work success. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 58–62.
12.
JudgeT. A.BonoJ. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 80–92.
13.
JudgeT. A.HurstC. (2007). The benefits and possible costs of positive core self-evaluations: A review and agenda for future research. In NelsonD.CooperC. L. (Eds.), Positive organizational behavior (pp. 159–174). London: Sage.
14.
KaneR. (2002). Oxford handbook of free will. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
LevensonH. (1974). Activism and powerful others: Distinctions within the concept of internal-external control. Journal of Personality Assessment, 38, 377–383.
16.
MasicampoE. J.BaumeisterR. F. (2008). Toward a physiology of dual-process reasoning and judgment: Lemonade, willpower, and expensive rule-based analysis. Psychological Science, 19, 255–260.
17.
McClellandD. C. (1961). The achieving society. New York: Van Nostrand.
18.
MirelsH.GarrettJ. (1971). The Protestant ethic as a personality variable. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 36, 40–44.
19.
MountM. K.OhI.BurnsM. (2008). Incremental validity of perceptual speed and accuracy over general mental ability. Personnel Psychology, 61, 113–139.
20.
PaulhusD. L.MargessonA. (1994). Free Will and Determinism (FAD) Scale. Unpublished manuscript, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
21.
RotterJ. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcements. Psychological Monographs, 80, 609.
22.
RyanR. M.FrederickC. M. (1997). On energy, personality and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality, 65, 529–565.
23.
SchmidtF. L.HunterJ. E. (1992). Development of a causal model of processes determining job performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 89–92.
24.
SchmidtF. L.HunterJ. E. (2004). General mental ability in the world of work: Occupational attainment and job performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 162–173.
25.
SpectorP. E. (1982). Behavior in organizations as a function of employees' locus of control. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 482–497.
26.
TettR. P.JacksonD. N.RothsteinM. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44, 703–742.
27.
ThomasW. H. N. G.SorensenK. L.EbyL. T. (2006). Locus of control at work: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 1057–1087.
28.
VohsK. D.BaumeisterR. F.SchmeichelB. J.TwengeJ. M.NelsonN. M.TiceD. M. (2008). Making choices impairs subsequent self-control: A limited resource account of decision making, self-regulation, and active initiative. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 883–898.
29.
VohsK. D.SchoolerJ. (2008). The value of believing in free will: Encouraging a belief in determinism increases cheating. Psychological Science, 19, 49–54.
30.
VroomV. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: John Wiley.
31.
WeberM. (1905). Die protestantische Ethik und der “Geist” des Kapitalismus [The Protestant ethic and the sprit of capitalism]. Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 20, 1–54.
