Finding Teammates Who Are Not Prone to Sucker and Free-Rider Effects: The Protestant Work Ethic as a Moderator of Motivation Losses in Group Performance
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online January, 2008
Finding Teammates Who Are Not Prone to Sucker and Free-Rider Effects: The Protestant Work Ethic as a Moderator of Motivation Losses in Group Performance
This study examined whether differences in the endorsement of the `Protestant Work Ethic' (PWE) are related to motivation losses in group work. Three factors were derived from male student scores on the Mirels—Garrett Protestant Work Ethic Scale, Ho's Australian Work Ethic Scale and a scale designed to assess preferences for reward distributions: instrumental value of work, ethical value of work and normative value of equity. The study assessed motivation loss in two situations; one designed to promote free-rider effects and another designed to promote sucker effects. Results showed that the sucker effect was moderated by all three factors but in qualitatively different ways whereas the free rider effect was not strongly moderated by any of the PWE factors.
Adams, J.S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 267—99). New York: Academic Press.
2.
Antoni, C.H. (1994). [Teamwork in companies — concepts, experiences, perspectives].Gruppenarbeit in Unternehmen — Konzepte, Erfahrungen, Perspektiven. Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.
3.
Arnscheid, R., Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1997). [Lack of motivation in groups: An empirical test of a theoretical integration]. Motivationsverluste in Gruppen. Ein empirischer Test einer theoretischen Integration. Zeitschrift fuer Sozialpsychologie , 28, 241—250.
4.
Blood, M. (1969). Work values and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 456—459.
5.
Brickenkamp, R. (1994). [Test d2 — attention speed test]. Test d2 Aufmerksamkeits-Belastungs-Test. 8. Auflage (1. Auflage: 1962)Göttingen: Hogrefe Verlag für Psychologie.
6.
Buchholz, R. (1976). Measurement of beliefs. Human Relations, 29, 1177—1188.
7.
Cacioppo, J.T., & Petty, R.E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116—131.
8.
Furnham, A. (1990a). The Protestant work ethic. New York: Routledge.
9.
Furnham, A. (1990b). A content, correlational, and factor analytic study of seven questionnaire measures of the Protestant Work Ethic. Human Relations, 43, 383—399.
10.
Goldstein, B., & Eichhorn, R. (1961). The changing Protestant ethic: Rural patterns in health, work and leisure. American Sociological Review , 26, 557—565.
11.
Greenberg, J. (1978). Equity, equality, and the Protestant Ethic: Allocating rewards following fair and unfair competition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 217—226.
12.
Hammond, P., & Williams, K. (1976). Protestant ethic thesis: Social psychological assessment. Social Forces, 54, 579—589.
13.
Harkins, S., & Jackson, J. (1985). The role of evaluation in eliminating social loafing . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 457—465.
14.
Harkins, S., & Szymanski, K. (1989). Social loafing and group evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 934—941.
15.
Hart, J.W., Karau, S.J., Stasson, M.F., & Kerr, N.A. (2004). Achievement motivation, expected coworker performance, and collective task motivation: Working hard or hardly working. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 984—1000.
16.
Heaven, P. (1989). Structure and personality correlates of the Protestant Work Ethic among women. Personality and Individual Differences , 10, 101—104.
17.
Ho, R. (1984). Adherence to Protestant Work Ethic values and helping judgments towards the unemployed. Unpublished paper.
18.
Ho, R., & Lloyd, J. (1984). Development of an Australian work ethic scale . Australian Psychology, 19, 321—332.
19.
Hogan, R., & Blake, R.J. (1996). Vocational interests: Matching self-concept with the work environment. In K. R. Murphy (Ed.), Individual differences and behavior in organizations . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20.
Homans, G.C. (1958). Human behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 597—606.
21.
Homans, G.C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
22.
Ingham, A.G., Levinger, G., Graves, J., & Peckham, V. (1974). The Ringelmann effect: Studies of group size and group performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 10, 371—384.
23.
Karau, S.J., & Williams, K.D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681—706.
24.
Kerr, N. (1983). Motivation losses in small groups: A social dilemma analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 819—828.
25.
Kerr, N., & Brunn, S. (1983). Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free rider-effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 78—94.
26.
Kravitz, M., & Martin, B. (1986). Ringelmann rediscovered. The original article . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 936—941.
27.
Latane, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 823—832.
28.
Lied, T., & Pritchard, R. (1976). Relationship between personality variables and components of the expecting valence model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 463—467.
29.
McClelland, D.C. (1961). The achieving society. New York: Van Nostrand.
30.
Mirels, H., & Garrett, J. (1971). The Protestant ethic as a personality variable . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 36, 40—44.
31.
Moede, W. (1927). [Introduction to performance psychology]. Die Richtlinien der Leistungspsychologie. Industrielle Psychotechnik , 4, 193—209.
32.
Orbell, J., & Dawes, R. (1981). Social dilemmas. In G. Stephenson & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Progress in applied social psychology (Vol. 1). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
33.
Ray, J. (1982). The Protestant ethic in Australia. Journal of Social Psychology, 116, 127—138.
34.
Shepperd, J.A. (1993). Productivity loss in performance groups: A motivation analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 67—81.
35.
Shepperd, J.A., & Taylor, K.M. (1999). Social loafing and expectancy-value theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1147—1158.
36.
Smith, B.N., Kerr, N.A., Markus, M.J., & Stasson, M.F. (2001). Individual differences in social loafing: Need for cognition as a motivator in collective performance. Group Dynamics, Theory, Research, and Practice, 5, 150—158.
37.
Steiner, I.D. (1972). Group process and group Productivity. New York: Academic Press.
38.
Szymanski, K., & Harkins, S. (1987). Social loafing and self-evaluation with a social standard. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 891—897.
39.
Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G.W. (1973). New directions in equity research. Journal of Social and PersonalityPsychology, 25, 151—176.
40.
Weber, M. (1905). Die protestantische Ethik und der `Geist' des Kapitalismus. [The Protestant Ethic and the Sprit of Capitalism]. Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 20, 1—54.
