The purpose of this exploratory intrinsic case study was to delineate the mentoring practices of the preeminent violin pedagogue Miss Dorothy DeLay and to evaluate the transmission of these practices onto her mentees. The psychological and behavioral traits that influenced her mentoring style were also examined. Data sources included semi-structured interviews, field notes, and analysis of qualitative documents. The findings illuminated a broad range of mentoring practices that DeLay’s students were exposed to during their studies with her, including mentoring students at psychosocial and career levels as well as role-modeling. Of all of DeLay’s mentoring practices, however, capitalizing on the strengths of individual students and intentional socialization into the field appears to be the most beneficial to the development of young aspiring musicians. Her mentoring and teaching practices were transmitted to her mentees through processes of replication, mutation, and aspiration. DeLay’s personality traits, such as cognitive awareness of others and empathy, seemed to play a role in shaping her mentoring style.
AbelesH. F. (1975). Student perceptions of characteristics of effective applied music instructors. Journal of Research on Music Education, 23, 147–154.
2.
AlexanderL. D. (1980). Peer tutoring effects on the music performance of tutors and tutees in beginning band classes [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 8015062)
3.
AmbrosettiA.DekkersJ.KnightB. A. (2017). Mentoring triad: An alternative mentoring mode for preservice teachers’ education. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 25(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2017.1308093
BarrettJ. R. (2014). Case study in music education. In ConwayC. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook on qualitative research in American music education (pp. 113–132). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199844272.013.007
6.
BensonM. A. (2008). Effective mentoring for new music teachers: An analysis of the mentoring programs for new music teachers as described in the literature. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 26(2), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123308317953
7.
BergM. H.RickelsD. A. (2018). Mentoring for mentors: The music mentor plus program. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 27(2), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083717720634
8.
BloomB. S. (1985). Generalizations about talent development. In BloomB. S. (Ed.), Developing talent in young people (pp. 507–549). Ballantine. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083717720634
ConwayC. M. (2002). Perceptions of beginning teachers, mentors, and administrators regarding preservice music teacher preparation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 20–36.
11.
ConwayC. M.HolcombA. (2008). Perceptions of experienced music teachers regarding their work as music mentors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429408323073
12.
ConwayC. M.KruegerP. J.RobinsonM.HaackP.SmithM. V. (2002). Beginning music teacher induction and mentoring: A cross-state perspective. Arts Education Policy Review, 104(2), 9–17.
13.
CreswellJ. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE.
14.
CreswellJ. W.Creswell BáezJ. (2021). 30 essential skills for the qualitative researcher (2nd ed.). SAGE.
15.
CreswellJ. W.PothC. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. HarperCollins.
18.
DarrowA. A.GibbsP.WedelS. (2005). Use of classwide peer tutoring in the general music classroom. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 24(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/87551233050240010103
DravesT. J.KoopsL. H. (2010). Peer mentoring: Key to new music teacher educator success. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 20(2), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083710375538
21.
DukeR. A.SimmonsA. L. (2006). The nature of expertise: Narrative descriptions of 19 common elements observed in the lessons of three renowned artist-teachers. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 170, 7–19.
22.
DuttonJ. E. (2003). Energize your workplace: How to create and sustain high-quality connections at work. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
23.
EmersonR. M.FretzR. I.ShawL. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). University of Chicago.
24.
FeldmanD. H. (1999). The development of creativity. In StenbergR. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 169–186). Cambridge University Press.
GauntH. (2008). One-to-one tuition in a conservatoire: The perceptions of instrumental and vocal teachers. Psychology of Music, 36(2), 215–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735607080827
29.
GholsonS. A. (1998). Proximal positioning: A strategy of practice in violin pedagogy. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46(4), 535–545. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345349
30.
GolemanD. (2006). Social intelligence: The new science of human relationships. Bantam Books.
GoodrichA. (2018). Peer mentoring and peer tutoring among K–12 students: A literature review. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 36(2), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123317708765
33.
HookerC.NakamuraJ.CsikszentmihalyiM. (2014). The group as mentor. In CsikszentmihalyiM. (Ed.), The systems model of creativity (pp. 207–225). Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9085-7_13
34.
IhasD. (2017). Sculpting musical artists: A tribute to the legacy of Miss Dorothy DeLay. American String Teacher, 67(4), 2–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003131317734840
35.
JarvinL.SubotnikR. F. (2005). Beyond expertise: Conceptions of giftedness as great performance. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 343–357). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610455.020
36.
JarvinL.SubotnikR. F. (2006). Understanding elite talent in academic domains: A developmental trajectory from basic abilities to scholarly productivity/artistry. In DixonF. A.MoonS. M. (Eds.), The handbook of secondary gifted education (pp. 203–220). Prufrock Press.
37.
JarvinL.SubotnikR. F. (2010). Wisdom from conservatory faculty: Insights on success in classical music performance. Roeper Review, 32(2), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783191003587868
KoornhofP. (2001). Sweet genius: The teaching skills of master violin teacher Dorothy DeLay (pp. 78–86). The Strad.
40.
KramK. E. (1985). Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life. Scott, Foresman, and Company. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.3930250410
41.
Lawrence-LightfootS. L. (2000). Respect: An exploration. Perseus Books.
Memories of Dorothy DeLay. (2002). Unpublished memorial document with 67 letters.
49.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldañaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. SAGE.
50.
MontalvoW.ByrneM. W. (2016). Mentoring nurses in political skill to navigate organizational politics. Nursing Research & Practice, 2016, 3975634. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3975634
51.
NoraA.CrispG. (2008). Mentoring students: Conceptualizing and validating the multi-dimensions of a support system. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory, & Practice, 9(1), 337–356. https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.9.3.e
52.
OverbeckJ. R.ParkB. (2001). When power does not corrupt: Superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 549–565. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.4.549
RaginsB.KramK. (2007). The roots and meaning of mentoring. In RaginsB.KramK. (Eds.), The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research and practice (pp. 3–16). SAGE.
56.
ReeseJ. (2015). Virtual mentoring of preservice teachers: Mentors’ perceptions. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 25(3), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083715577793
57.
SaldañaJ. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE.
SandB. L. (2000). Teaching genius: Dorothy DeLay and the making of a musician. Amadeus Press.
60.
ScanduraT. A. (1992). Mentorship and career mobility: An empirical investigation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130206
61.
ScanduraT. A.PellegriniE. K. (2007). Workplace mentoring: Theoretical approaches and methodological issues. In AllenT. D.EbyL. T. (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of mentoring: A multiple perspective approach (pp. 71–91). Blackwell.
62.
ScanduraT. A.RaginsB. R. (1993). The effects of sex and gender role orientation on mentorship in male-dominated occupations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 43(3), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1993.1046
63.
SchmidtC. P. (1989). Applied music teaching behavior as a function of selected personality variables. Journal of Research in Music Education, 37(4), 258–271. https://doi.org/10.2307/3344660
64.
SchockettM. R.YoshimuraE.Beyord-TaylorK.HaringJ. J. (1983, April). Proposed model of mentoring [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Anaheim, CA, United States.
65.
SheldonD. A. (2001). Peer and cross-age tutoring in music: Peer and cross-age tutoring allows music students to help each other and benefits both the music teacher and the students themselves. Music Educators Journal, 87(6), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/3399690
66.
SrivastavaS. B. (2015). Network intervention: Assessing the effect of formal mentoring on workplace networks. Social Forces, 94(1), 427–452. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sov041
67.
StephensJ. P.HeaphyE.DuttonJ. E. (2011). High quality connections. In CameronK. S.SpreitzerG. M. (Eds.), Handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 1–19). Oxford University Press.
ThomasG. (2016). How to do your case study: A guide for students and researchers. SAGE.
70.
TsungN. H. H. (1993). An investigation into realm of violin technique: Conversations with Dorothy DeLay [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The Juilliard School.
71.
TurnerK. M. (2002). Mentoring practices for music teachers in school districts of the Northwest states [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3049125)
72.
Vandermaas-PeelerM.MillerP. C.MooreJ. L. (Eds.). (2018). Excellence in mentoring undergraduate research. Council of Undergraduate Research.
73.
WatersL.McCabeM.KillerupD.KillerupS. (2002). The role of formal mentoring on business success and self-esteem in participants of a new business start-up program. Journal of Business & Psychology, 17(1), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016252301072
74.
WexlerM. (2008). A comparative survey of goals and strategies of college music performance teachers across instrumental groups [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Teachers College, Columbia University.
75.
WrzesniewskiA.DuttonJ. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179–201. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378011
76.
ZuckermanE. (1996). Scientific elite: Nobel laureates in the United States (2nd ed.). Transaction.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
