Near-Peer Mentorship: A Model for Private Music Instruction in an Underserved Community

Abstract

The case presented in this study focused on the experiences of students enrolled in a Saturday day music program situated in an underserved community. Students in this community represent a wide variety of cultural backgrounds, and we were interested in whether younger students in the program would benefit from receiving lessons from an older student from the same community. This case study was bound by the shared experiences of the participants who engaged in music teaching and learning through this community music program. Data included the following: student surveys, participant interviews, private lesson and orchestra class observations, and teacher assessments. Overall, near-peer mentorship was beneficial. The majority of participants in this study experienced gains in performance skills. Interviews with the mentors revealed several benefits from tutoring a younger student, including self-analysis of instrument performance, positive feelings gained from helping others, and social benefits. The fifth-grade students who were assigned a mentor reported that they learned instrument-specific skills from their mentor and felt more comfortable and confident playing different songs because instruction was individualized.

Keywords

private music instruction underserved community increasing access near peer

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexander

Dorow

L. G.

(1983). Peer tutoring effects on the music performance of tutors and tutees in beginning band classes. Journal of Research in Music Education, 31, 33–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345108

Benham

(2009). Increasing access to strings: A step-by-step guide to crating after-school music programs. www.astaweb.com

Bierda

Chait

(2011). Increasing teacher diversity: Strategies to improve the teacher workforce. Center for American Progress.

Costa-Giomi

Chappell

(2007). Characteristics of band programs in a large urban school district: Diversity or inequality? Journal of Band Research, 42(2), 1–18.

DeLorenzo

L. C.

(2012). Missing faces from the orchestra: An issue of social justice? Music Educators Journal, 98, 39–46.

Egalite

A. J.

Kisida

Winters

M. A.

(2015). Representation in the classroom: The effect of own-race teachers on student achievement. Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, 45, 44–52.

Elpus

Abril

C. R.

(2011). High school music ensemble students in the United States: A demographic profile. Journal of Research in Music Education, 52(2), 128–145.

Gillespie

R. A.

Hamann

D. L.

(1998). The status of orchestra programs in the public schools. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46(1), 75–86.

Ginsburg-Block

M. D.

Rohrbeck

C. A.

Fantuzzo

J. W.

(2006). A meta-analytic review of social, self-concept, and behavioral outcomes of peer-assisted learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 732–749.

10.

Give A Note Foundation. (2017). The status of music education in United States public schools.

11.

Goodrich

(2007). Peer mentoring in a high school jazz ensemble. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55, 94–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/002242940705500202

12.

Goodrich

(2018). Peer mentoring and peer tutoring among K-12 students: A literature review. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 36(2), 13–21.

13.

Green

(2002). How popular musicians learn: A way ahead for music education. Ashgate.

14.

Green

(2008). Music, informal learning, and the school: A new classroom pedagogy. Ashgate.

15.

Johnson

E. A.

(2011). The effect of peer-based instruction on rhythm reading achievement. Contributions to Music Education, 38, 43–60.

16.

Johnson

E. A.

(2015). Peer-teaching in the secondary music ensemble. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3, 35–42. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i5.906

17.

Johnson

E. A.

(2017). The effect of symmetrical and asymmetrical peer-assisted learning structures on music achievement and learner engagement in seventh-grade band. Journal of Research in Music Education, 65(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429417712486

18.

Kozol

(2005). The shame of the nation: The restoration of apartheid schooling in America. Three Rivers Press.

19.

Ladson-Billings

(2006). From the achievement gap to education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools. Educational Researcher, 35, 3–12.

20.

Lucas

Robinson

(2003). Reaching them early: Identifying and supporting prospective teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 29(2), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260747032000098444

21.

Madsen

C. K.

(2011). Music teacher education students as cross-age reading tutors in an after-school setting. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 20(2), 40–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083710371441

22.

Madsen

C. K.

Smith

D. S.

Feeman

C. C.

Jr. (1988). The use of music in cross-age tutoring within special education settings. Journal of Music Therapy, 35(3), 135–144.

23.

McFarland

Hussar

Wang

Zhang

Wang

Rathbun

Barmer

Forrest Cataldi

Bullock Mann

(2018). The Condition of Education 2018 (NCES 2018-144). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved December 6, 2018 from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2018144.

24.

National Association for Music Education. (2019). Equity and access in music education: A position statement of the National Association for Music Education. https://nafme.org/about/position-statements/equity-access/

25.

Quiocho

Rios

(2000). The power of their presence: Minority group teachers and schooling. Review of Educational Research, 70(4), 485–528.

26.

Saldaña

(2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE.

27.

Scruggs

B. B.

(2008). Learning outcomes in two divergent middle school string orchestra classroom environments: A comparison of a learner-centered and a teacher-centered approach [Doctoral dissertation]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database. (UMI No. 3371516)

28.

Sheldon

D. A.

(2001). Peer and cross-age tutoring in music: Peer and cross-age tutoring allows music students to help each other and benefits both the music teacher and the students themselves. Music Educators Journal, 87(6), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/3399690

29.

Shields

(2001). Music education and mentoring as intervention for at-risk adolescents: Their self-perceptions, opinions, and attitudes. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49, 273–286. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345712

30.

Smith

B. P.

Mick

Alexander

M. L.

(2018). The Status of strings and orchestra programs in U.S. schools. String Research Journal, 8, 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948499218769607

31.

Webb

R. S.

(2015). An exploration of three peer tutoring cases in the school orchestra program. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 203, 63–80.