This paper was presented upon receiving the Outstanding String Researcher Award at the 2017 National American String Teachers Association (ASTA) Conference in Pittsburgh. The author traces significant experiences and people who shaped her interest in conducting research, followed by a confessional tale of the affective experience of engaging in, and teaching others how to initially engage in, the research process. The author then invites readers to consider various questions we might explore in our collective future research, pointing to the connections between and vital roles of making music and doing research.
AisenbergN.HarringtonM. (1988). Women of academe: Outsiders in the sacred grove. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
2.
AustinJ. R.BergM. H. (2006). Exploring music practice among sixth-grade band and orchestra students. Psychology of Music, 34, 535–558. doi:10.1177/0305735606067170
3.
AustinJ. R.BergM. H. (2016, March). The reliability, validity and utility of edTPA scores: A within-program analysis. Paper presented at the NAfME Music Research and Teacher Education National Conference, Atlanta, GA.
4.
BergM. H. (1997). Social construction of musical experience in two high school chamber music ensembles (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 9731212)
5.
BergM. H. (2000). Thinking for yourself: The social construction of chamber music experience. In RideoutR.PaulS. J. (Eds.), On the sociology of music education II: Papers from the music education symposium at the University of Oklahoma (pp. 91–112). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
6.
BergM. H. (2008). Getting the minutes in: A case study of beginning instrumentalists’ music practice. In ThompsonL.CampbellM. (Eds.), Diverse methodologies in the study of music teaching and learning: Advances in music education research (pp. 45–64). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
7.
BergM. H. (2010). Fostering effective and enjoyable practice. American String Teacher, 60(4), 30–33.
8.
BergM. H. (2014). Instrumental music (strings). In ConwayC. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research in American music education (pp. 409–428). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
9.
BergM. H.BauerW.WoodyR. (2002). Cognitive processes of preservice music teachers during observation of music instruction. Music Education Research, 4, 275–287. doi:10.1080/1461380022000011966
10.
BergM. H.ConwayC. (2017). The design and implementation of the ASTA mentor program: Perceptions of program developers and mentor preparation workshop participants. String Research Journal, 7, 63–82.
11.
BergM. H.SindbergL. (2014). Supports for and constraints on CMP-based student teaching. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 201, 61–77.
12.
BogdanR. C.BiklenA. K. (2006). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
13.
BoyerE. L. (1997). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
14.
CreswellJ. W. (2006). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
15.
DabczynskiA. H. (1994). Northern week at Ashokan, 1991: Fiddle tunes, motivation and community at the fiddle and dance camp (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 9423169)
16.
DeweyJ. (1910). How we think. Boston, MA: D.C. Heath.
17.
GholsonS. A. (1993). Proximal positioning: A strategy of practice in expert violin pedagogy. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 9424583)
18.
HaefnerM. (1992). Believe in yourself: A case study of exemplary music teaching (Master’s thesis). University of Cincinnati, OH.
19.
JorgensenE. R. (2003). Transforming music education. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
20.
KantorskiV. J.StegmanS. F. (2006). A content analysis of qualitative research dissertations in music education, 1998–2002. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 168, 63–73.
21.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldañaJ. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
22.
OareS. (2008). The Chelsea House Orchestra: A case study of a non-traditional school instrumental ensemble. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 177, 63–78.
ReimerB. (1985). Toward a more scientific approach to music education research. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 83, 1–22.
25.
SchensulJ. J.LeCompteM. D. (2013). Essential ethnographic methods: A mixed methods approach (2nd ed., Ethnographer’s toolkit book 3). Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
26.
ShulmanL. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–23. doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
27.
Van MaanenJ. (2011). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28.
VygotskyL. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
WebsterP. R. (2002). Creative thinking in music: Advancing a model. In SullivanT.WillinghamL. (Eds.), Creativity and music education (pp. 16–33). Edmonton, Alberta: Canadian Music Educators’ Association.
30.
YingerR. J. (1987, April). By the seat of your pants: An inquiry into improvisation and teaching. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
