Recent research in music education has found that college or conservatory students demonstrate similar self-regulated learning behaviors to those of professional musicians. Yet, how a musician becomes an expert is still unknown. The purpose of my study was to investigate how college string majors demonstrate efficient self-regulated practice behaviors, how they use self-regulated learning behaviors in their practice sessions to become independent learners, and how the semi-structured practice diary can be an effective tool for enhancing self-regulated learning in instrumental practice. I conducted a collective case study on four college-level students: a freshman, sophomore, senior, and a recent college graduate. They were asked to keep a semi-structured diary based on an instrumental model of the self-regulated learning cycle. Through interviews, I also obtained information about their musical backgrounds and their attitudes toward practicing. Results substantiated previous research showing that college music students demonstrate a wide range of self-regulatory skills. Furthermore, results indicate that there are some plausible transition stages in becoming a skillful self-regulated learner.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
BanduraA. (1991). Self-regulation of motivation through anticipatory and self-reactive mechanism. In DienstbierR.A. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 38. Perspectives on motivation (pp. 69–164). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
3.
BarryN. H. (1992). The effects of practice strategies, individual differences in cognitive style, and gender upon technical accuracy and musicality of student instrumental performance. Psychology of Music, 20(2), 112–123.
4.
BratenI., SamuelstuenM. S., & StromsoH. I. (2004). Do students’ self-efficacy beliefs moderate the effects of performance goals on self-regulatory strategy use?Educational Psychology, 24(2), 231–247.
5.
CarverC., & ScheierM. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control theory approach to human behavior.New York: Springer-Verlag.
6.
CreswellJ.W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
7.
EricssonK. A. & CharnessN. (1994). Expert performance its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49, 725–747.
8.
EricssonK. A. & LehmannA. C., (1996). Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 273–305.
9.
EricssonK. A., KrampeR. T., & Tesch-RomerC. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.
10.
GellrichM., OsterwoldM. & SchulzJ. (1986). Leistungsmotivation bei kindern im instumentalunterricht. Bericht uber eine erkundungsstudie (Children's performance motivation in instrumental teaching), Musikpsychologie, 3, 33–69.
11.
GrusonL. M. (1988). Rehearsal skill and musical competence: Does practice make perfect? In SlobodaJ. A. (Ed.), Generative processes in music (pp. 91–112). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
HallamS. (1995). Professional musicians’ approaches to the learning and interpretation of music. Psychology of Music, 23(2), 111–128.
13.
HallamS. (1997). What do we know about practice? In JorgensenH., & LehmannA. C. (Eds.), Does practice make perfect? Current theory and research on instrumental practice. (pp. 179–229). Oslo, Norway: Norges Musik Khogskole.
14.
HallamS. (2001). The development of expertise in young musicians: Strategy use, knowledge acquisition and individual diversity. Music Education Research, 3(1), 7–23.
15.
HayesJ. R. (1981). The complete problem solver.Philadelphia: Franklin Institute Press.
16.
JorgensenH. (2002). Instrumental performance expertise and amount of practice among instrumental students in a conservatoire. Music Education Research, 4(1), 105–119.
17.
KimS. J. (2008). A collective case study of self-regulated learning in instrumental practice of college string majors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University.
18.
KrampeR. T., & EricssonK.A. (1995). Deliberate practice and elite musical performance. In RinkJ. (Ed.), The practice of performance: Studies in musical interpretation (pp. 84–102). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
McCormickJ. & McPhersonG. (2003). The role of self-efficacy in a musical performance examination: An exploratory structural equation analysis. Psychology of Music, 31(1), 37–51.
20.
McPhersonG. E. & ZimmermanB. J. (2002). Self-regulation of musical learning. In ColwellR., & RichardsonC. (Eds.), The New Handbook of Research on Music Teaching and Learning (pp. 327–347). New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
NielsenS. (2001). Self-regulating learning strategies in instrumental music practice. Music Education Research, 3(2), 155–167.
22.
NielsenS. (2004). Strategies and self-efficacy beliefs in instrumental and vocal individual practice: a study of students in higher music education. Psychology of Music, 32(4), 418–431.
23.
SchmitzB. & WieseB. (2006). New perspectives for the evaluation of training sessions in self-regulated learning: Time-series analyses of diary data. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 64–96.
24.
SlobodaJ., DavidsonJ. W., HoweM. J. A., & MooreD. (1996). The role of practice in the development of performing musicians. British Journal of Psychology, 87, 287–309.
25.
StakeR. E. (2006). Multiple Case Study Analysis.New York: The Guilford Press.
26.
WebberJ., ScheuermannB., McCallC., & ColemanM. (1993). Research on self-monitoring as a behavior management technique in special education classrooms: A descriptive review. Remedial and Special Education, 14, 38–56.
27.
WeisbergR. W. (1999). Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. In SternbergR. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 226–250). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
WilliamonA., & ValentineE. (2000). Quantity and quality of musical practice as predictors of performance quality. British Journal of Psychology, 91(3), 353–376.
29.
YinR. K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and methods (3rd Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
ZimmermanB. J. (1986). Becoming a self-regulated learner: Which are the key subprocesses?Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 307–313.
31.
ZimmermanB. J. (1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructional models. In SchunkD. H., & ZimmermanB. J. (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 1–19). New York: Guilford Press.
32.
ZimmermanB. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation. A social cognitive perspective. In BoekaertsM.PintrichP. R., & ZeidnerM. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). London: Academic Press.
