The purpose of this study was to explore a microanalysis technique for measuring instrumentalists’ self-regulation tendencies during music practice. A secondary purpose was to investigate whether an intervention informed by the features of the microanalysis technique would increase the students’ self-regulated learning tendencies. Three undergraduate instrumental music education majors volunteered to participate in this study. This study was designed as a multiple-baselines experiment spanning 15 consecutive days. Data sources included (a) entrance interviews; (b) daily practice efficacy ratings; (c) data gathered from pre- and posttest microanalysis sessions; (d) detailed behavioral analyses of video-recorded, pre- and posttest practice sessions; and (e) a focus group exit interview. The microanalytic intervention designed for this study involved a coaching session in which a member of the research team explicitly drew attention to the affective, behavioral, and metacognitive qualities related to effective practicing during a student’s practice session. The pretest microanalysis data revealed distinct learning profiles for each student that were corroborated with information from the other data sources. The intervention had modest effects that varied across participants, suggesting that it was useful for bringing to light and addressing individuals’ specific self-regulatory deficiencies in a manner respective to their needs.
ArtinoA. R.ClearyT. J.DongT.HemmerP. A.DurningS. J. (2014). Exploring clinical reasoning in novices: A self-regulated learning microanalytic assessment approach. Medical Education, 48, 280–291. doi:10.1111/medu.12303
2.
AustinJ. R.BergM. H. (2006). Exploring music practice among sixth-grade band and orchestra students.Psychology of Music, 34, 535–558. doi:10.1177/0305735606067170
3.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
BarryN. H. (2007). A qualitative study of applied music lessons and subsequent student practice sessions. Contributions to Music Education, 34, 51–65. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24127258
5.
CahnD. (2008). The effects of varying ratios of physical and mental practice, and task difficulty on performance of a tonal pattern. Psychology of Music, 36, 171–191. doi:10.1177/0305735607085011
6.
ClarkT.WilliamonA. (2011). Evaluation of a mental skills training program for musicians. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 23, 342–359. doi:10.1080/10413200.2011.574676
7.
ClearyT. J. (2011). Emergence of self-regulated learning microanalysis: Historical overview, essential features, and implications for research and practice. In ZimmermanB. J.SchunkD. H. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 329–345). New York, NY: Routledge.
8.
ClearyT. J.CallanG. L.ZimmermanB. J. (2012). Assessing self-regulation as a cyclical, context-specific phenomenon: Overview and analysis of SRL microanalytic protocols. Education Research International, 2012, 1–19. doi:10.1155/2012/428639
9.
ClearyT. J.DongT.ArtinoA. R. (2015). Examining shifts in medical students’ microanalytic motivation beliefs and regulatory processes during a diagnostic reasoning task. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 20, 611–626. doi:10.1007/s10459-014-9549-x
10.
CreechA.GauntH. (2013). The changing face of individual instrumental tuition: Value, purpose, and potential. In McPhersonG. E.WelchG. F. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music education (pp. 694–711). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11.
DiBenedettoM. K.ZimmermanB. J. (2010). Differences in self-regulatory processes among students studying science: A microanalytic investigation. International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 5, 2–24.
12.
DukeR. A.SimmonsA. L.CashC. D. (2009). It’s not how much; it’s how: Characteristics of practice behavior and retention of performance skills. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56, 310–321. doi:10.1177/0022429408328851
EricssonK. A.KrampeR. T.Tesch-RomerC. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406. Retrieved from doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363
15.
HatfieldJ. L. (2016). Performing at the top of one’s musical game. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–16. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01356
16.
HatfieldJ. L.HalvariH.LemyreP. N. (2016). Instrumental practice in the contemporary music academy: A three-phase cycle of self-regulated learning in music students. Musicae Scientiae, 21(3), 1–22. doi:1029864916658342
17.
HatfieldJ. L.LemyreP. N. (2016). Foundations of intervention research in instrumental practice. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–11. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02014
18.
HenleyP. T. (2001). Effects of modeling and tempo patterns as practice techniques on the performance of high school instrumentalists. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49(2), 169–180. Retrieved from doi:10.2307/3345868
19.
JørgensenH. (2002). Instrumental performance expertise and amount of practice among instrumental students in a conservatoire. Music Education Research, 4, 105–119. doi:10.1080/14613800220119804
20.
KitsantasA.ZimmermanB. J. (2002). Comparing self-regulatory processes among novice, non-expert, and expert volleyball players: A microanalytic study. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 14, 91–105. doi:10.1080/10413200252907761
21.
KoopmanC.SmitN.de VugtA.DeneerP.den OudenJ. (2007). Focus on practice-relationships between lessons on the primary instrument and individual practice in conservatoire education. Music Education Research, 9, 373–397. doi:10.1080/14613800701587738
22.
KruegerR. A.CaseyM. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
Leon-GuerreroA. (2008). Self-regulation strategies used by student musicians during music practice. Music Education Research, 10(1), 91–106. doi:10.1080/14613800701871439
24.
McPhersonG. E. (2005). From child to musician: Skill development during the beginning stages of learning an instrument. Psychology of Music, 33, 5–35. doi:10.1080/14613800220119804
25.
McPhersonG. E.DavidsonJ. W.FaulknerR. (2012). Music in our lives: Rethinking musical ability, development and identity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
26.
McPhersonG. E.McCormickJ. (1999). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of musical practice. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 141, 98–102. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40318992
27.
McPhersonG. E.McCormickJ. (2000). The contribution of motivational factors to instrumental performance in a music examination. Research Studies in Music Education, 15, 31–39. doi:10.1177/1321103X0001500105
28.
McPhersonG. E.McCormickJ. (2006). Self-efficacy and music performance. Psychology of Music, 34(3), 322–336. doi:10.1177/0305735606064841
29.
McPhersonG. E.MikszaP.EvansP. (2018). Self-regulated learning in music practice and performance. In ZimmermanB.SchunkD. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 181–193). New York, NY: Routledge.
30.
McPhersonG. E.OsborneM. S.EvansP.MikszaP. (in press). Applying self-regulated learning microanalysis to study musicians’ practice. Psychology of Music. doi:10.1177/0305735617731614
31.
McPhersonG. E.RenwickJ. M. (2001). A longitudinal study of self-regulation in children’s musical practice. Music Education Research, 3, 169–186. doi:10.1080/14613800120089232
32.
McPhersonG. E.ZimmermanB. J. (2011). Self-regulation of musical learning: A social cognitive perspective on developing performance skills. In ColwellR.WebsterP. (Eds.), MENC handbook of research on music learning: Vol. 2. Applications (pp. 130–175). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33.
MikszaP. (2006). An exploratory investigation of self-regulatory and motivational variables in the music practice of junior high band students. Contributions to Research in Music Education, 33, 9–26. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24127206
34.
MikszaP. (2007). Effective practice: An investigation of observed practice behaviors, self-reported practice habits, and the performance achievement of high school wind players. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55, 359–375. doi:10.1177/0022429408317513
35.
MikszaP. (2011a). The development of a measure of self-regulated practice behavior for beginning and intermediate instrumental music students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59, 321–338. doi:10.1177/0022429411414717
36.
MikszaP. (2011b). Relationships among achievement goal motivation, impulsivity, and the music practice of collegiate wind players. Psychology of Music, 39, 50–67. doi:10.1177/0022429408317513
37.
MikszaP. (2011c). A review of research on practicing: Summary and synthesis of the extant research with implications for a new theoretical orientation. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 190, 51–92. doi:10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.190.0051
38.
MikszaP. (2015). The effect of self-regulation instruction on the performance achievement, musical self-efficacy, and practicing of advanced wind players. Psychology of Music, 43, 219–243. doi:10.1177/0305735613500832
39.
MikszaP.McPhersonG. E.HercegA.MiederK. (in press). Developing self-regulated musicians. In DiBenedettoM. K. (Ed.), Connecting self-regulated learning and performance with instruction across high school content areas. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
40.
MikszaP.PrichardS.SorboD. (2012). An observational study of intermediate band students’ self-regulated practice behavior. Journal of Research in Music Education, 60, 245–266. doi:10.1177/0022429412455201
41.
MikszaP.TanL. (2015). Predicting collegiate wind players’ practice efficiency, flow, and self-efficacy for self-regulation: An exploratory study of relationships between teachers’ instruction and students’ practicing. Journal of Research in Music Education, 63, 162–179. doi:10.1177/0022429415583474
42.
NielsenS. G. (2004). Strategies and self-efficacy beliefs in instrumental and vocal individual practice: A study of students in higher music education. Psychology of Music, 32, 418–431. doi:10.1177/0305735604046099
43.
SimmonsA. L. (2012). Distributed practice and procedural memory consolidation in musicians’ skill learning. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59, 357–368. doi:10.1177/0022429411424798
44.
VarelaW.AbramiP. C.UpitisR. (2015). Self-regulation and music: A systematic review. Psychology of Music, 44, 55–74. doi:10.1177/0305735614554639
45.
WeinbergR. S.GouldD. (2014). Foundations of sport and exercise psychology (6th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
46.
ZimmermanB. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In BoekaertsM.PintrichP. R.ZeidnerM. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). New York, NY: Academic Press.
47.
ZimmermanB. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 166–183. doi:10.3102/0002831207312909
48.
ZimmermanB. J. (2012). Goal setting: A key proactive source of academic self-regulation. In SchunkD. H.ZimmermanB. J. (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 267–295). New York, NY: Routledge.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
