Abstract
Objective
Women have a higher prevalence and burden of joint injuries and pathologies involving articular cartilage than men. Although knee injuries affecting young women are on the rise, most studies related to sexual dimorphism target postmenopausal women. We hypothesize that sexual dimorphism in cartilage structure and mechanics is present before menopause, which can contribute to sex disparities in cartilage pathologies.
Design
Bovine knee was used as a model to study healthy adult cartilage. We compared elastic moduli under compression, abundances of extracellular and pericellular matrix (PCM) proteins using proteomics, and PCM constituency with tissue immunofluorescence. The gene expression of matrix-related genes under basal, anabolic, and catabolic conditions was assessed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).
Results
The equilibrium modulus was higher in male cartilage compared with female cartilage. Proteoglycans were not associated with this biomechanical dimorphism. Proteomic and pathway analyses of tissue showed dimorphic enriched pathways in extracellular matrix (ECM)-related proteins in which male cartilage was enriched in matrix interconnectors and crosslinkers that strengthen the ECM network. Moreover, male and female tissue differed in enriched PCM components. Females had more abundance of collagen type VI and decorin, suggesting different PCM mechanics. Furthermore, the activation of regenerative and catabolic function in chondrocytes triggered sex-dependent signatures in gene expression, indicating dimorphic genetic regulation that is dependent on stimulation.
Conclusions
We provide evidence for sexual dimorphism in cartilage before menopause. Some differences are intrinsic to chondrocytes’ gene expression defined by their XX versus XY chromosomal constituency.
Introduction
In most biological and clinical studies, sexual dimorphism has been addressed—for the most part—as an equivalent inclusion of males and females with
To date, most explorations of sexual dimorphism have been contextualized in the chondrogenic potential of stem cells6,7 and the response of mature chondrocytes to sex-specific hormones.8-10 Identifying sex-intrinsic differences in the ability of chondrocytes to synthesize and maintain their extracellular matrix (ECM) has significant scientific and clinical implications. For example, better clinical results have been observed in men than women after autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), 11 but the underlying mechanism for this is still unknown. These facts led us to investigate whether ECM composition and mechanics are sexually dimorphic.
Here, we hypothesize that sexual dimorphism in cartilage is present before menopause, which can contribute to the sexual disparities in cartilage affecting diseases. Due to the limitations of obtaining healthy and young adult human cartilage, we have used bovine knee as a model. We tested mechanical properties, abundance of ECM and pericellular matrix (PCM) proteins, and gene expression under basal, anabolic, and catabolic conditions. Altogether, we provide insights into the hallmarks of sexual dimorphism and a motivation to fully decode the mechanical, molecular, and regulatory mechanisms that lay behind them.
Method
Cell Culture and Treatments
Six stifle joints from adult cattle, between 24 and 30 months old, were obtained from a local abattoir (6♀, 6♂). The sex of the samples was corroborated with a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting Bos taurus gene for DEAD box protein (DDX3X and DDX3Y), 12 as shown in Supplementary methods and Supplementary Figure S1. Articular cartilage was dissected from the femoral condyle. Tissue was digested with 0.2% pronase (Roche) in complete media (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium [DMEM] high glucose + 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum + 1x antibiotics-antimycotics + 50 µg/ml ascorbic acid) for 1 hour at 37°C, followed by 0.2% collagenase D (Roche) in complete media for 17 hours at 37°C in gentle agitation. Digested cells were passed through a 100-µm cell strainer and washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Cells were expanded in complete media for less than 10 days and used as passage 0, or expanded further, up to passage 2. For IL-1β treatment, cells in passage 0 were incubated in serum-free media with or without 10 ng/ml bovine recombinant IL-1β for 24 hours.
RNA Extraction and quantitative PCR (qPCR)
Total RNA was extracted from cells using RNeasy columns (QIAGEN) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 1 µg of total RNA was used to convert to cDNA with an iScript conversion kit (Bio-Rad). From that, 12.5 ng were used for each qPCR reaction by employing iTaq Universal SYBR green supermix (Bio-Rad) in a CFX96 qPCR machine (Bio-Rad). The relative quantity to normalizer was calculated using 2–ΔCt with the geometric mean of GAPDH and 18S for basal and catabolic conditions. For regenerative function, we used 18S and SDHA as normalizers. Bovine primers are summarized in Supplementary Table S1. Primers for bovine decorin (DCN) and HSPG2 were obtained from Bio-Rad.
Immunohistochemistry
Fresh cartilage samples were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and embedded in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) for cryosectioning. Slides of 5 µm thickness were kept cold and fixed in 10% neutralized buffered formalin for 10 minutes at room temperature. Slides were washed twice for 5 minutes each with PBS, blocked for 1 hour at room temperature in 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) with 10% goat serum in PBS, and incubated with primary antibodies in tris-buffered saline (TBS) + 0.1% Tween 20 (TBST) containing 2% BSA overnight at 4°C. Primary antibodies used were anti-collagen VI (Novus Biologicals, NB120-6588, 1:300), anti-perlecan (Novus Biologicals, NBP-0570, 1:100), anti-collagen IX (Novus Biologicals, NBP2-92796, 1:120), and anti-decorin (Abcam, ab181456, 1:100). Negative controls were done by omitting the primary antibody. After washing 3 times for 10 minutes each in TBS + 0.2% Tween 20 at room temperature with gentle shaking, slides were incubated with secondary antibody goat anti-rabbit Alexa 488 or anti-mouse Alexa 594 (Molecular Probes, 1:1000) for 1 hour at room temperature in 5% BSA-TBST in the dark. Slides were washed 3 times for 10 minutes each in TBS + 0.2% Tween 20 at room temperature with gentle shaking in the dark. Slides were stained for 3 minutes at room temperature with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Invitrogen, D1306) for nuclear counterstain. After 2 quick washes with PBS and 1 rinse with MilliQ water, slides were mounted using Vectashield (Vector Laboratories). Pictures were taken using a Zeiss LSM880 Airyscan confocal microscope. The same exposure conditions were used for all samples with the same antigen and their corresponding negative controls. Images were processed in ImageJ (U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/).
Proteoglycan Staining and Quantification
Cartilage slides of 5 µm thickness were obtained from paraffin-embedded blocks. Slides were de-paraffinized and rehydrated for safranin-O staining. Slides were subjected to the following steps: Weigert’s iron hematoxylin for 5 minutes, 4 washes with distilled water, 1% acid alcohol for 2 seconds, and washed 3 times with distilled water. For better quantification, we omitted the use of fast green as previously described. 13 We added 1% acetic acid for 45 seconds, 1% safranin-O stain for 30 minutes, washed with ethanol (95%) 3 times, and washed with xylene 2 times. Slides were mounted using Permount (Fisher). For quantification of glycosaminoglycans (GAG) content, images were converted to 8-bit and gray intensity after calibration was measured using ImageJ. Optical density for 6 animals per sex was analyzed using GraphPad v9.1.
Cells and Proteoglycan Depletion of Cartilage Samples (Collagen-Enriched Samples)
Full-thickness cartilage without subchondral bone was obtained from bovine femoral condyle using sharp dissection. Samples were collected using 6 mm diameter punches and immediately frozen in PBS-soaked gauze at –80°C until further use. To remove proteoglycans, cells, and nuclear material, we used a previously described protocol 14 with some modifications. After 24 hours of chondroitinase digestion, samples were incubated with 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) in hypotonic buffer with protease inhibitor cocktail for 24 hours at room temperature. After that, samples were washed for 24 hours with PBS at room temperature and constant agitation. Removal of nuclear material was confirmed by staining a thin layer of cartilage with DAPI and visualizing it in a fluorescence microscope (Nikon Eclipse Ti).
Mechanical Analysis
We used 1 to 2 full-thickness cartilage samples without subchondral bone per animal (6♀ and 6♂). We measured sample thickness and corroborated diameter of 6 mm using a digital caliper (Cen-Tech) and then loaded them (subchondral bone interface down) onto a Bose Electroforce 3200 Analyzer (TA Instruments; New Castle, DE). We used a 2.45 N or 450 N load cell, depending on the stiffness of the sample, in unconfined compression between two stainless steel compression plates. The sample was placed within a sandpaper-lined 150 mm tissue culture dish (Corning; Corning, NY) and submerged in PBS. The sample was secured between the compression plates with an initial small normal load of 0.1 N to generate uniform contact between the plates, to keep the sample flat, and to maintain positioning during PBS filling. After immersion at room temperature, samples were allowed to sit and equilibrate for at least 1 hour or until the gap between plates remained constant. The gap at this point was noted to ensure proper strain calculations. The prestress resulting from the 0.1 N preload was not significantly different between males and females (Suppl. Fig. S2). After the plate gap reached a steady state, samples underwent stepwise stress relaxation to compressive strains of 2%, 4%, 6%, 8%, and 10% at a rate of 0.050 mm/s. TA Wintest software (TA Instruments; New Castle, DE) was used to collect data at 100 points/second sampling rates. Samples were compressed stepwise then held constant for 45 minutes. The final Cauchy stress value at each step (averaged over the final 200 s of readings) was recorded and calculated as the equilibrium stress at the given strain using MATLAB software (MathWorks Inc.; Natick, MA). Equilibrium stress was then collected at each of the five strain levels and plotted versus incremental strain. Modulus calculations were made from the linear portion of the equilibrium curves.
Proteomics
Decellularized samples from 6 animals per sex were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and pulverized using a mortar and pestle. The powder was suspended in 5% SDS with 50 mM of triethylammonium bicarbonate (TEAB) in a ratio of 500 µl per 100 mg of powder. Dithiothreitol (DTT) was added to a final concentration of 10 mM, and samples were incubated at 57°C for 30 minutes. After cooling, iodoacetamide was added to a final concentration of 20 mM, and samples were incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature in the dark. Following centrifugation for 2 minutes at 13,200 rpm, the supernatants were removed, of which 50 µl of each sample were digested overnight with trypsin at 37°C using an S-Trap (ProtiFi). Following digestion, the peptide eluate was dried and reconstituted in 100 mM of TEAB buffer. The remaining pellets were washed with 100 mM of TEAB (pH 8.0) 3 times. Then, 50 µl of 8 M urea in 100 mM of TEAB (pH 8.0) buffer was added to suspend each pellet, and these were diluted with 10 mM of CaCl2 and 100 mM of TEAB (pH 8.0) to bring the final urea concentration below 2 M. This solution was digested at 37°C with Lys-C for 2 hours, followed by overnight trypsin digestion. After digestion, the slurry was centrifuged, and the supernatant was removed and cleaned using an MCX uElution SPE plate (Waters). The peptides were dried and reconstituted in 100 mM of TEAB and combined with their initial corresponding supernatant digests. The samples were labeled with Tandem Mass Tag (TMT) reagent, quenched with 5% hydroxylamine, and combined. These were dried using an HLB uElution plate (Waters), reconstituted in a 2% acetonitrile, 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) buffer, and injected onto an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer coupled to an Ultimate 3000 RSLC-Nano liquid chromatography system. Samples were injected onto a 75 µm i.d., 75-cm long EasySpray column (Thermo Scientific) and eluted with a gradient from 0% to 28% buffer B over 180 minutes. Buffer A contained 2% (v/v) acetonitrile (ACN) and 0.1% formic acid in water, and buffer B contained 80% (v/v) ACN, 10% (v/v) trifluoroethanol, and 0.1% formic acid in water. The mass spectrometer operated in positive ion mode with a source voltage of ~2 kV and an ion transfer tube temperature of 275°C. MS scans were acquired at 120,000 resolution in the Orbitrap, and top speed mode was used for SPS-MS3 analysis with a cycle time of 2.5 seconds. MS2 was performed with collision induced dissociation (CID) with a collision energy of 35%. The Top 10 fragments were selected for MS3 fragmentation using higher-energy C-trap dissociation (HCD) with a collision energy of 58%. Dynamic exclusion was set for 25 seconds after an ion was selected for fragmentation. Raw MS data files were analyzed using Proteome Discoverer v2.4 SP1 (Thermo Scientific), with peptide identification performed using Sequest HT searching against the bovine protein database from UniProt. Fragment and precursor tolerances of 10 ppm and 0.6 Da were specified, and three missed cleavages were allowed. Carbamidomethylation of Cys and TMT labeling of N-termini and Lys side chains were set as a fixed modification, with oxidation of Met being set as a variable modification. The false discovery rate cutoff was 1% for all peptides. Results are shown in Supplementary Table S2.
Transforming Growth Factor–β3 (TGF-β3) Treatment in Alginate Beads
After trypsinization, 2 × 106 cells were suspended in 1 ml of 1.2% alginate solution. Beads were prepared as previously described 15 and grown in chondrogenic media (DMEM high glucose, 1% insulin-transferin-selenium [Sigma-Aldrich]), 1% nonessential amino acids (Gibco), 1% antibiotic-antimycotic solution (Gibco), and 50 µg/ml of ascorbic acid containing 10 ng/ml of TGF-β3 (R&D Systems, 8420). Media was replaced twice a week.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed in GraphPad v9.1. For mechanic data, linear regression models were fitted and slopes of regression were compared using analyses of covariance (ANCOVAs). Sample thicknesses were averaged and compared using a two-tailed unpaired Student’s
Results
Dimorphism in Cartilage Network Mechanics
The equilibrium modulus of articular cartilage depends on the intactness of both collagen and proteoglycan networks.18,19 In this study, we used a stress relaxation test in bovine cartilage to determine the equilibrium compressive modulus in unconfined compression (

Dimorphism in cartilage network mechanics. (
We next evaluated the individual contribution of the collagen network and proteoglycans to the observed dimorphism. For proteoglycans, first we used viscoelastic modeling to calculate the relaxation time at 8% strain. A lower relaxation time indicates a higher permeability and a faster loss of liquid under compression. We found no differences in relaxation time between males and females (Suppl. Fig. S3). Next, we investigated the proteoglycan content of male and female cartilage samples using histological analysis. For this, we employed a previously described method using safranin-O staining with no fast green.
13
A stronger safranin-O staining was found only in the deep zone of male cartilage compared with female (

Proteoglycans are not responsible for mechanical dimorphism. (
Differential Enrichment of ECM Proteins in Male and Female Cartilage
Because cells and proteoglycan do not appear to be responsible for the observed sex-dependent mechanical differences, we hypothesized that collagen network-related components are the drivers of the observed higher stiffness in male cartilage. To investigate dimorphism in collagen components, we performed a proteomic analysis of the collagen-enriched fraction of the samples. Proteomic analysis, including proline and methionine oxidation as variable modifications, identified 224 proteins (Suppl. Table S2). Because cells and proteoglycan depletion also removed nonstructural proteins, we did not detect associated metalloproteases (MMPs) or a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs (ADAMTSs), but other matrix proteases such as HtrA1 (which showed no sex differences) were detected. In addition, a small number of cellular proteins that could result from incomplete removal of the cellular fraction were also present.
Pathway analysis using WebGestalt (WEB-based Gene SeT AnaLysis Toolkit)
21
confirmed differences between males and females (

Dimorphic enrichment of ECM proteins in male and female cartilage. (
In summary, we found that male cartilage has an enrichment in proteins and pathways associated with stabilizing the ECM structure, while female cartilage is enriched in cell-ECM connectors. There is dimorphism in the PCM composition, which could have significant consequences on mechanotransduction (
Differential PCM Protein Abundance
To validate our proteomics results regarding PCM composition, we performed tissue immunofluorescence staining of collagens type VI, IX, decorin, and perlecan. Collagen type VI was detected at the surface layer and in the vicinity of chondrocytes throughout cartilage layers. The most evident difference was that in female cartilage, collagen VI was found also in the interterritorial areas of the ECM in the middle area (

Dimorphic abundance of PCM proteins in male and female cartilage. Representative images of Z-project with maximum intensity of collagen type VI (
Dimorphism in Unstimulated Chondrocyte Monolayers or “Basal” Conditions
Among possible mechanisms for the observed dimorphism in ECM and PCM proteins is that male and female chondrocytes express these targets differentially depending on their chromosomal sex (XX vs. XY) and/or that the tissue remodeling is dimorphic. To test the first option, we explored sex differences in the mRNA expression of a group of ECM components (COL2A1, ACAN, COL10A1, and COL11A1), the master chondrogenic transcription factor SOX9, PCM components (COL6A1, COL9A1, DCN, and HSPG2), the basal expression of MMPs (MMP-1, MMP-3, MMP-9, MMP-13, and ADAMTS-4, ADAMTS-5), and their inhibitors (tissue inhibitor of metalloproteases [TIMP]-1, TIMP-2) using chondrocyte monolayers at an early stage of cell expansion, that is, in passage 0. Because chondrocytes were not exposed to additional external stimulation such as mechanical load or chondrogenic factors, we call these “basal” conditions. Although the expression of COL2A1 and ACAN was similar in male and female cells (

Chondrocytes show sexual dimorphism in gene expression of PCM proteins. (
In the context of homeostatic (non-inflammatory) matrix remodeling, the basal expression of the aggrecanases ADAMTS4 and ADAMTS5 was not dimorphic (
Taken together, these data show that male and female chondrocytes differentially express SOX9, COL6A1, COL9A1, and DCN, which can contribute to different abundances of PCM proteins in cartilage tissue.
Dimorphism in Chondrocyte Catabolic Function
Because male and female chondrocytes showed a differential gene expression under basal conditions, we next sought to determine whether there are sex differences in chondrocytes’ catabolic function that can affect ECM remodeling. Catabolism is the hallmark of cartilage degradation and the progression of OA and can directly affect matrix mechanics. To induce catabolic function, chondrocytes were treated with 10 ng/ml of IL-1β for 24 hours. COL2A1 and ACAN expressions were drastically reduced after treatment, with no difference between male and female chondrocytes (

Catabolic function elicits a dimorphic response. Chondrocytes were treated with 10 ng/ml IL-1β for 24 hours to provoke an inflammatory response and activate the catabolic function. No differences were detected in the expression of COL2A1, ACAN, SOX9 (
In terms of matrix proteases, ADAMTS4 and ADAMTS5 were upregulated in both sexes, but their increase in expression was not as much as the increase in the expression of MMPs. ADAMTS4 upregulation was higher in males (
Taken together, we showed that male and female chondrocytes respond differentially to a pro-inflammatory stimulation induced by IL-1β. ADAMTS4 upregulation was higher in males, while MMP1 upregulation was higher in females. The expression of COL9A1 and DCN conserved the dimorphism detected in basal conditions.
No Dimorphism in Anabolic Function
Because we found an intrinsic dimorphism in gene expression between male and female chondrocytes under both basal and catabolic conditions, we next explored whether these cells have a differential response to anabolic conditions. This is a clinically relevant question, as cartilage repair therapies such as ACI rely on the anabolic function of expanded and re-implanted chondrocytes. Identifying a potential dimorphism in chondrocyte anabolic activity could help improve and tailor current interventions. To test this, we used expanded chondrocytes as a way to mimic ACI conditions. Cells were expanded in monolayers for 2 passages (P2). Cells were then transferred to a three-dimensional (3D) microenvironment provided by alginate beads and grown for up to 2 weeks in the presence of chondrogenic media supplemented with 10 ng/ml of TGF-β3. Gene expression of cells in monolayers was compared with cells in beads after 1 and 2 weeks of 3D culture (

No dimorphism was detected in chondrocyte regenerative function. (
Discussion
Here, we have challenged the idea that sexual dimorphism is restricted to menopause. To overcome the difficulties of obtaining young and healthy human cartilage, in this initial exploration we used bovine knee cartilage as a model. Cows have a significant reduction in fertility by 13-15 years old22,23; therefore, our model—equivalent to 18- to 20-years old in human—represents premenopausal and sexually mature age. Male cartilage had a higher abundance of network crosslinking proteins, such as fibulins and lysyl oxidase-like 2 (LOXL-2), compared with female cartilage. Moreover, male and female tissue differed in their enrichment of PCM components, and this difference is intrinsic to the chondrocyte’s chromosomal sex. Indeed, we observed a dimorphic gene expression depending on the specific stimulation (

Venn diagram summarizing the targets that were differentially regulated in male and female chondrocytes depending on the particular stimulation. Arrow and symbol indicate which biological sex had an upregulated gene expression. MMP = metalloprotease; ADAMTS = a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs; DCN = decorin; COL = collagen; SOX9 = SRY (sex determining region Y)-Box 9.
After the depletion of cells and proteoglycans to yield a collagen-enriched matrix, a 1.5-fold reduction in the moduli was observed, independent of the sex of the sample. Noticeably, the difference in moduli from male and female cartilage was still 3.45-fold, the same as for intact cartilage, suggesting that dimorphic mechanics may likely originate at the collagen network level and not due to the difference in the proteoglycan content. However, no sexual dimorphism was found in collagen type II content, indicating that other ECM components may drive the observed difference in the modulus.
Proteomic and pathway analysis of the collagen-enriched samples revealed male and female cartilage had differentially enriched pathways. Male cartilage had increased abundance of proteins associated with stabilization of recently formed collagen II fibrils and further stabilization of the matrix by crosslinking. In agreement with these results, pathways enriched in males were related to the stabilization of the ECM structure and crosslink. These findings suggest that collagen and elastin fibrils in males may have a different structural arrangement than in females. A comprehensive analysis is needed of collagen matrix structure in male and female tissue to fully decode matrix dimorphism and will follow this study. Proteins more abundant in males interconnect collagen fibrils and connect fibrils to other ECM components, strengthening network interactions. For example, collagen type IX, which was enriched in male cartilage, regulates the fibril diameter of collagen type II and connects collagen with other ECM members.30-32 Nidogen-2 and fibulin-1 and -4 were also enriched in male cartilage, and both proteins participate in the repair process of elastin fibers post-damage and in elastin and collagen fibril crosslinking by allowing the proteolytic activation of LOXs.33,34 Indeed, male tissue was enriched in LOXL-2. These proteins are copper-dependent amine oxidases that crosslink collagen and affect the mechanical properties of cartilage by stabilizing the network. 35 Collagen type XII, however, helps absorb tensile stress,36,37 further favoring network stabilization in male cartilage.
In contrast, proteins that were more abundant in female cartilage are primarily localized in the vicinities of the cell and have roles associated with cell adhesion to the PCM (vitronectin) 38 and PCM structural proteins. Indeed, one of the enriched pathways in females was integrin cell surface interactions and NCAM1 interactions, which involve cell binding to the ECM. The PCM forms the narrow capsule covering chondrocytes, which is crucial for mechanotransduction.39-42 The specific protein composition of the PCM matrix determines its mechanical properties. 43 From the PCM targets that we analyzed by immunofluorescence to validate our proteomics data, we found that collagen type VI, perlecan, and decorin were mostly present in the PCM area. Collagen type IX was distributed throughout the tissue. We did not observe dimorphism in the staining pattern of perlecan, and we did not detect sex differences in the expression level of its gene, HSPG2. The fold change obtained in proteomics was enriched 1.28 times more in males compared with females. It is possible that there is a small fraction of perlecan that remains associated with the collagen matrix in our collagen-enriched protocol, and that this is more abundant in male tissue. A proteomic analysis of intact cartilage holds the answer.
In terms of decorin and collagen VI, we consistently found that these proteins were enriched in the PCM of female tissue and that their gene expression was upregulated in female chondrocytes. This indicates that chondrocytes express differential amounts of these targets based on their chromosomal constituency. This raises the question of whether males and females have an intrinsic differential mechanotransduction mechanism or if the mechanostimulation that they receive is differential as determined by sex-based PCM and/or ECM matrix elasticity. We argue that dimorphism at the PCM could potentially impact the way chondrocytes respond to mechanical stimulation and regulate cartilage homeostasis.
The expression of SOX9 under basal conditions was upregulated in male compared with female cells. However, the expression of COL2A1 and ACAN, which are controlled by SOX944,45 was not dimorphic. However, the expression of COL9A1, also controlled by SOX9, 46 was upregulated in males as well. It is possible that additional mechanisms controlling COL2A1 and ACAN expression are involved.
In the regenerative function, male and female chondrocytes responded in a comparable manner; no dimorphic gene expression of the selected targets was observed. This experiment used expanded chondrocytes up to passage 2 to mimic the
In terms of the basal expression of catabolic markers, only MMP3 showed a trend (
Our study has some limitations. It is likely that our sample preparation protocol for collagen enrichment affects matrix mechanics. However, we exposed samples simultaneously to the same protocol; therefore, we expected equivalent depletion across samples. Future studies, including those involving transcriptomics on freshly isolated cells and cells exposed to physiological oxygen conditions, are needed to further reveal dimorphic signatures for different biological functions. Due to the high variability between samples and to the limited number of proteins in the collagen-enriched, we considered
Understanding sexual dimorphism in articular cartilage mechanics and homeostasis determined by chromosomal sex can have significant consequences for the management of musculoskeletal diseases and for cartilage-regenerative medicine. Current clinical interventions, such as osteochondral implants or ACI, rely on ECM synthesis and the regulation of the catabolic response. Cartilage repair using these approaches could be tailored to target sex-specific responses.
Supplemental Material
sj-docx-1-car-10.1177_19476035221121792 – Supplemental material for Sexual Dimorphism in the Extracellular and Pericellular Matrix of Articular Cartilage
Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-car-10.1177_19476035221121792 for Sexual Dimorphism in the Extracellular and Pericellular Matrix of Articular Cartilage by Paula A. Hernandez, Miranda Moreno, Zahra Barati, Conner Hutcherson, Adwait A. Sathe, Chao Xing, Jamie Wright, Tre Welch and Yasin Dhaher in CARTILAGE
Supplemental Material
sj-xlsx-2-car-10.1177_19476035221121792 – Supplemental material for Sexual Dimorphism in the Extracellular and Pericellular Matrix of Articular Cartilage
Supplemental material, sj-xlsx-2-car-10.1177_19476035221121792 for Sexual Dimorphism in the Extracellular and Pericellular Matrix of Articular Cartilage by Paula A. Hernandez, Miranda Moreno, Zahra Barati, Conner Hutcherson, Adwait A. Sathe, Chao Xing, Jamie Wright, Tre Welch and Yasin Dhaher in CARTILAGE
Footnotes
Authors Contributions
Conceptualization: P.H. and Y.D. Data acquisition: Z.B., C.H., M.M., J.W., and P.H. Data analysis: P.H., C.H., Z.B., M.M., A.S., C.X., J.W., and T.W. Supervision: P.H. Data interpretation: P.H., C.H., C.X., A.S., Y.D., Z.B., and M.M. All authors contributed to writing and approving the manuscript for publication. All data obtained in this study are shown in results and in supplementary information. Proteomics data will be uploaded to a public repository upon publication of this manuscript.
Acknowledgments and Funding
The authors thank the Proteomics Core, the Histopathology Core, and the Quantitative Light Microscopy Core (1S10OD021684-01 to Kate Luby-Phelps) at UT Southwestern Medical Center. The authors also thank Dr. Jonathan Rios, Dr. Carol Wise, and Dr. John Wardale for their comments on the manuscript, as well as Dave Primm for help in editing it. The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Funding was provided by the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at UT Southwestern Medical Center.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Ethical Approval
No IRB or IACUC was required for this study.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
