Recent developments in endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) have increased the need to investigate the complex anatomic variations in the ethmoid roof and skull base, to inform the surgeon about the risk of damaging these crucial areas during ESS.
Objective
To offer a detailed description of sinus anatomy focusing on the key surgical landmarks in ESS and frontal recess surgery to standardize a systematic approach during the preoperative sinuses imaging evaluation.
Methodology: A total of 220 computed tomography (CT) scans were reviewed to obtain six sets of measurements: the depth of the cribriform plate (CP); the length of the lateral lamella of the cribriform plate (LLCP); the angle formed by the LLCP and the continuation of the horizontal plane passing through the CP; the position of the anterior ethmoidal artery (AEA) at the skull base; the extent of frontal sinus pneumatization (FSP); the type of superior attachment of the uncinate process (SAUP).
Results
The length of the LLCP was statistically significantly correlated with the different Keros classification types, the angle formed by the LLCP with the continuation of the horizontal plane passing through the CP, and with the AEA position at the skull base. The depth of the olfactory fossa was correlated with FSP.
Conclusions
According to the Keros and Gera classifications, the data obtained from these evaluations allow the assessment of anatomic-radiological risk profiles and can help identify those patients who are high risk for ethmoid roof injury.
PretiAMozzanicaFGeraR, et al.
Horizontal lateral lamella as a risk factor for iatrogenic cerebrospinal fluid leak. Clinical retrospective evaluation of 24 cases. Rhinology. 2018;
56(4): 358–363.
2.
SuzukiSYasunagaHMatsuiH, et al.
Complication rates after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: analysis of 50,734 Japanese patients.Laryngoscope. 2015;
125(8): 1785–1791.
3.
OhnishiTYanigasawaE.Lateral lamella of the cribriform plate an important high-risk area in endoscopic sinus surgery. Ear Nose Throat J. 1995;
74: 688–690.
4.
GeraRMozzanicaFKarligkiotisA, et al.
Lateral lamella of the cribriform plate, a keystone landmark: proposal for a novel classification system.Rhinology. 2018;
56(1): 65–72.
5.
StammbergerHKennedyDWBolgerW.Paranasal sinuses: anatomic terminology and nomenclature. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1995;
167: 7–16.
6.
OhnishiTTachibanaTKanekoY, et al.
High-risk areas in endoscopic sinus surgery and prevention of complications. Laryngoscope. 1993;
103(10): 1181–1185.
7.
VaidSVaidN.Normal anatomy and anatomic variants of the paranasal sinuses on computed tomography. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2015;
25(4): 527–548.
8.
KerosP.On the practical value of differences in the level of the lamina cribrosa of the ethmoid. Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol. 1962;
41: 809–813.
9.
ErdoganSKeskinIGTopdagM, et al.
Ethmoid roof radiology; analysis of lateral lamella of cribriform plate.Otolaryngol Pol. 2015;
69(6): 53–57.
10.
AbdullahBLimEHMohamadS, et al.
Anatomical variations of anterior ethmoidal artery at the ethmoidal roof and anterior skull base in Asians. Surg Radiol Anat. 2019;
41(5): 543–550.
11.
YaziciD.The effect of frontal sinus pneumatisation on anatomic variants of paranasal sinuses.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;
276(4): 1049–1056.
12.
LiuSCWangCHWangHW.Prevalence of the uncinate process, agger nasi cell and their relationship in a Taiwanese population. Rhinology. 2010;
48: 239–244.
13.
AsalNBayar MulukNInalM, et al.
Olfactory fossa and new angle measurements: lateral lamella-cribriform plate angle. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;
30(6): 1911–1914.
14.
ErdemGErdemTMimanMC, et al. A radiological anatomic study of the cribriform plate compared with constant structures. Rhinology. 2004;
42: 225–229.
15.
SkorekATretiakowDSzmudaT, et al.
Is the Keros classification alone enough to identify patients with the ‘dangerous ethmoid'? An anatomical study. Acta Otolaryngol. 2017;
137(2): 196–201.
16.
BasakSKaramanCZAkdilliA, et al.
Evaluation of some important anatomical variations and dangerous areas of the paranasal sinuses by CT for safer endonasal surgery. Rhinology. 1998;
36(4): 162–167.
17.
SommerFHoffmannTKHarterL, et al.
Incidence of anatomical variations according to the International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification (IFAC) and their coincidence with radiological signs of opacification.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;
276(11): 3139–3146.
18.
BabuACNairMRPBKuriakoseAM.Olfactory fossa depth: CT analysis of 1200 patients. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2018;
28(4): 395–400.
19.
GülerCUysalIOPolatK, et al. Analysis of ethmoid roof and skull base with coronal section paranasal sinus computed tomography. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;
23: 1460–1464.
20.
LundVJStammbergerHFokkensWJ, et al.
European position paper on the anatomical terminology of the internal nose and paranasal sinuses. Rhinol Suppl. 2014;
24: 1–34.
21.
KaplanogluHKaplanogluVDilliA, et al.
An analysis of the anatomic variations of the paranasal sinuses and ethmoid roof using computed tomography.Eurasian J Med. 2013;
45(2): 115–125.
22.
MeloniFMiniRRovasioS, et al.
Anatomic variations of surgical importance in ethmoid labyrinth and sphenoid sinus. A study of radiological anatomy. Surg Radiol Anat. 1992;
14(1): 65–70.
23.
JacobTGKaulJM.Morphology of the olfactory fossa – a new look. J Anat Soc India. 2014;
63: 30–35.
24.
PawarAKondeSBholeP.Assessment of depth of olfactory fossa in pre-functional endoscopic sinus surgery computed tomography scan of paranasal sinuses. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;
4: 83–86.
25.
LebowitzRATerkAJacobsJB, et al. Asymmetry of the ethmoid roof: analysis using coronal computed tomography. Laryngoscope. 2001;
111(12): 2122–2124.
26.
ElwanySMedanniAEidM, et al.
Radiological observations on the olfactory fossa and ethmoid roof. J Laryngol Otol. 2010;
124(12): 1251–1256.
27.
HeatonCMGoldbergANPletcherSD, et al.
Sinus anatomy associated with inadvertent cerebrospinal fluid during functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 2012;
122(7): 1446–1449.
28.
Lannoy-PenissonLSchultzPRiehmS, et al.
The anterior ethmoidal artery: radio-anatomical comparison and its application in endonasal surgery.Acta Otolaryngol. 2007;
127: 618–622.
29.
KoYBKimMGJungYG.The anatomical relationship between the anterior ethmoid artery, frontal sinus, and intervening air cells; can the artery be useful landmark?Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg. 2014;
57: 687–691.
30.
SimmenDRaghavanUBrinerHR, et al.
The surgeon’s view of the anterior ethmoidal artery. Clin Otolaryngol. 2006;
31: 187–191.
31.
Çomoğlu Ş, ŞahinBSönmezS, et al.
Frontal sinus pneumatization affects height of the lateral lamella and position of anterior ethmoidal artery. J Craniofac Surg. 2017;
28(1): 265–269.
FloreaniSRNairSBSwitajewskiMC, et al. Endoscopic anterior ethmoidal artery ligation: a cadaver study. Laryngoscope. 2006;
116: 1263–1267.
34.
YenigunAGoktasSSDoganR, et al.
A study of the anterior ethmoidal artery and a new classification of the ethmoid roof (Yenigun classification). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;
273(11): 3759–3764.
35.
GumusCYildirimA.Radiological correlation between pneumatization of frontal sinus and height of fovea ethmoidalis. Am J Rhinol. 2007;
21(5): 626–628.
36.
ChengSYYangCJLeeCH, et al.
The association of superior attachment of uncinate process with pneumatization of middle turbinate: a computed tomographic analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;
274(4): 1905–1910.
37.
NettoBPiltcherOBMeottiCD, et al.
Computed tomography imaging study of the superior attachment of the uncinate process.Rhinology. 2015;
53: 187–191.
38.
SrivastavaMTyagiS.Role of anatomic variations of uncinate process in frontal sinusitis. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;
68(4): 441–444.
39.
GüldnerCZimmermannAPDiogoI, et al.
Age-dependent differences of the anterior skull base. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;
76(6): 822–828.
