Handlooms in India are representative of the weavers’ skilled craftsmanship resulting from the traditional legacy that has persisted over centuries. Their contribution to India's overall employment is significant – ranking the second highest in rural and semi-urban employment, following agriculture. This research examines the contours of handloom weavers’ identity on its current landscape in India through the pervasive veracities of its socio-economic trajectories over a period that resonates with the conditions prevailing before independence to the present. We use mixed methods comprising basic statistics and Geographical Information System-based map along with the analysis of the Indian film ‘Kanchivaram,’ interwoven within a critical textual analysis of other scholarly work – all falling within the gamut of Digital Humanities – to support the narrative structure analysis of change/loss of identity and existence of these weavers – as portrayed in this film produced in 2008. This study walks us through the range and diversity of weavers’ spatial location, traits, and hardships, while traversing us through the slow loss of identity among handloom weavers. This study offers a critical and thorough grasp of the difficulties encountered by the weaving communities by highlighting trends of decline, changes in cultural identity, and the influence of political and economic forces on their traditional craft. Accordingly, we hope this study will be helpful to the researchers, artisans, and policymakers to trace and identify the undermining tangible and intangible factors responsible for framing the weavers’ landscape and help them strategise to protect and improve their identity.
AhmedW (2005) Indigenous communities and their marginalized space in India. In: GuptaKR (eds) Studies in Indian Economy. New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers, 188–2018.
2.
BanerjeePGangopadhyayS (2003) A study on the prevalence of upper extremity repetitive strain injuries among the handloom weavers of West Bengal. Journal of Human Ergology32(1): 17–22.
3.
BasuS (2012) Manual Margins: Weaving, Gender, and Market in Colonial and Postcolonial Bengal. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
4.
BordoloiS (2017) The rural nonfarm sector in flexible capitalism: The coir industries in Kerala, India. Human Geography10(1): 51–66.
5.
BoseC (2019) Perspectives on Work, Home, and Identity: The Crafting Lives of Telangana’s Artisans. Cham: Springer.
6.
BroudyE (1993) The Book of Looms: A History of the Handloom from Ancient Times to the Present. Hanover, NH: UPNE.
7.
ChakrabortyA (2021) Women empowerment and its significance: Studying through the lens of female handloom workers of India. The Management Accountant Journal56(3): 37–40.
8.
CostinCL (1998) Introduction: Craft and social identity. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association8(1): 3–16.
9.
CromptonCLaneRJSiemensR (eds) (2016) Doing Digital Humanities: Practice, Training, Research. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
10.
DasNC (1986) Development of Handloom Industry. New Delhi: Deep & Deep Publications.
11.
DurlovSDasBGangopadhyayS, et al. (2014) Prevalence of low back pain among handloom weavers in West Bengal, India. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health20(4): 333–339.
12.
GregoryDJohnstonRPrattG, et al. (eds) (2011) The Dictionary of Human Geography, 5th ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
13.
HadjiyanniTHelleK (2010) Crafting as a means of identity reconstruction in household settings. Home Cultures7(2): 157–180.
14.
HallS (1990) Cultural identity and diaspora. In: RutherfordJ (eds) Identity: Community, Culture, Difference. London: Lawrence & Wishart, 222–237.
15.
HallS (1997) Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: Sage Publications.
16.
HallSDu GayP (eds) (1996) Questions of Cultural Identity. London: Sage Publications.
17.
HandapangodaWSMadukalaJIWithanawasamMPK, et al. (2016) Caught between extremes: The culture and economics of traditional mask art in contemporary Sri Lanka. Journal of Cultural Geography33(2): 181–207.
18.
HarveyD (2007) Neoliberalism and the city. Studies in Social Justice1(1): 2–13.
19.
HitchcockMNuryantiW (2000) Building on Batik: The Globalization of a Craft Community. Routledge.
JonesSE (2013) The Emergence of the Digital Humanities. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
24.
Kanchivaram (2008) Directed by Priyadarshan. India: Percept Picture Company and Four Frames Pictures.
25.
KawlraA (2014) Duplicating the local: GI and the politics of ‘place’ in Kanchipuram. Unpublished manuscript.
26.
Kumaj JenaP (2010) Indian Handicrafts in globalization times: An analysis of global-local dynamics. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems (INDECS)8(2): 119–137.
27.
Martí-HennebergJFranch-AuladellXSolanas-JiménezJ (2016) The use of digital tools for spatial analysis in population geography. Frontiers in Digital Humanities3: 9.
28.
MatsuuraK (2005) Globalization, intangible cultural heritage and the role of UNESCO. In: WongL (eds) Globalization and Intangible Cultural Heritage. Tokyo: UNESCO and United Nations University, 16–21.
29.
McLaughlinR (2010) Rome and the Distant East: Trade Routes to the Ancient Lands of Arabia, India and China. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
30.
McRobbieA (2008) The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change. London: Sage Publications.
31.
Ministry of Textiles, Government of India (2010) Third National Handloom Census of Weavers and Allied Workers 2009–2010. National Handloom Development Programme, Development Commissioner for Handlooms, Ministry of Textiles, Government of India. Available at: https://handlooms.nic.in (accessed 10 April 2025).
32.
Ministry of Textiles, Government of India (2019) Fourth All India Handloom Census 2019–20. Development Commissioner for Handlooms, Ministry of Textiles, New Delhi, Government of India.Available at: http://handlooms.nic.in/writereaddata/3736.pdf (accessed 18 August 2023).
33.
Ministry of Textiles, Government of India (2020) Fourth All India Handloom Census 2019–2020. New Delhi: Government of India.
34.
NiranjanaS (2001) Alternating Current: Identity and Economics in Conflict. Kolkata: Stree.
35.
OECD (2009) Data on informal employment and self-employment. Available at: www.oecd.org/dev/employment (accessed 10 April 2025).
36.
OngA (1991) The gender and labor politics of postmodernity. Annual Review of Anthropology20: 279–309.
37.
PaasiA (2003) Region and place: Regional identity in question. Progress in Human Geography27(4): 475–485.
38.
RamanV (2010) The Warp and the Weft: Community and Gender Identity Among the Weavers of Banaras. Routledge.
39.
RameshG (2013) A study into the factors affecting suicides among weavers in Andhra Pradesh. Indian Journal of Economics and Development9(3): 220–227.
40.
RanavaadeVP (2022) Sustainable craft design systems for handloom weavers. Textile20(3): 399–409.
41.
RaoNSBabuKR (2018) Weavers’ family organisation and suicides in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana: A sociological analysis. Sociological Bulletin67(2): 188–203.
42.
RoyT (1999) Traditional Industry in the Economy of Colonial India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
RoyT (2020) The Crafts and Capitalism: Handloom Weaving Industry in Colonial India. New Delhi: Routledge India.
44.
ShahAPatelR (2017) Problems and challenges faced by handicraft artisans. Voice of Research6(1): 57–61.
45.
SharmaMRaniS (2023) Urbanization and economic interdependency: An econometric analysis of inter-state change and continuity in India, 1981–2011. In: ChatterjeeUBandyopadhyayNSetiawatiMDSarkarS (eds) Urban Commons, Future Smart Cities and Sustainability. Cham: Springer, 249–274.
46.
ShawT (2015) A study of the present situation of the traditional handloom weavers of Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India. International Research Journal of Social Sciences4(3): 48–53.
SmithT (1994) Flexible production and the capital/wage labour relation in manufacturing. Capital & Class18(2): 39–63.
49.
ValentineG (2001) Whatever happened to the social? Reflections on the ‘cultural turn’ in British human geography. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of Geography55(3): 166–172.
50.
Van GinkelH (2005) Cultural heritage, identity formation and change in a globalizing world. In: WongL (eds) Globalization and Intangible Cultural Heritage. Tokyo: UNESCO and United Nations University, 22–25.
51.
WaniKAKhanMR (2015) Evaluation of occupational exposure of carpet weavers in northern province of Madhya Pradesh (India) during different seasons. Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine19(2): 110.
52.
WendtA (1992) Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization46(2): 391–425.
53.
WildJPWildF (2004) Rome And India: Early Indian cotton textiles from Berenike, Red Sea coast of Egypt. In: Textiles in Indian Ocean Societies. Abingdon: Routledge, 15–23.
