Attachment to place and territoriality in Nandigram land struggle,India

Abstract

Spanish

The Nandigram peasant struggle against land acquisition for special economic zones (SEZs) in West Bengal, India, in 2006–2007, highlights the importance of attachment to place and territorialization in resistance. Analyzing the Nandigram land struggle, I underscore the importance of place-based attachment. I argue that land is a social relation. The land acquisition was a threat of breakage in that place-based relation, which led to negative perceptions of industrialization. This threat pronounced the existing attachment to place, which led to the spatialization of the muktanchal or liberated zone. I conceptualize the muktanchal as an act of territoriality, where militant peasant identities emerged that facilitated their claim-making. This paper uses content analysis of existing primary data from heterogeneous sources, to illuminate how the peasants strategically created the muktanchal to contest top-down attempts by the state to create a SEZ enclave.

Keywords

attachment to place land Nandigram special economic zones territorialization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agnew

(1987) Place and Politics. Boston: Allen and Unwin.

Ahmed

(2011) From mixed economy to neoliberalism. In: Ahmed

Kundu

Peet

(eds) India’s New Economic Policy. New York: Routledge , 33–56.

Bakker

Bridge

(2006) Material worlds? Progress in Human Geography 30(1): 5–27.

Bandyopadhyay

(2007) Land, Labour and Governance. Kolkata: Worldview.

Banerjee-Guha

(2009) Contradictions of enclave development in contemporary times. Human Geography 2(1): 1–29.

Banerjee-Guha

(2013) Accumulation and dispossession. South Asia 36(2): 165–179.

Basu

(1992) Two Faces of Protest. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Basu

(2007) ‘Brand Buddha’ in India’s West Bengal. Asian Survey 47(2): 288–306.

Beban

Schoenberger

(2019) Fieldwork undone. ACME 18(1): 77–103.

10.

Bidwai

(2007) India: Protests force delays on special economic zones. Inter Press Service, 12 February.

11.

Blomley

(2019) The territorialization of property in land. Territory, Politics, Governance 7(2): 233–249.

12.

Bondi

Avis

Bankey

et al. (2002) Subjectivities, Knowledges and Feminist Geographies. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

13.

Borras

SM.

Jr Hall

Scoones

et al. (2011) Towards a better understanding of global land grabbing. The Journal of Peasant Studies 38(2): 209–216.

14.

Bose

(1986) Agrarian Bengal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

15.

Chatterjee

(2009) The coming crisis in West Bengal. Economic and Political Weekly 44(9): 42–45.

16.

Chatterji

(2018) When CPI(M) had a ‘pact’ with Congress in 2004. Hindustan Times, 22 April.

17.

Chibber

(2006) Locked in Place. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

18.

Corbridge

Harriss

Jeffrey

(2013) India Today. Cambridge: Polity Press.

19.

Datta

(2007) Catch-22 in West Bengal. Rediff India Abroad, 24 March. Available at: http://www.rediff.com/money/2007/mar/24sez.htm (accessed 5 April 2020).

20.

De Rosa

(2018) A political geography of “waste wars” in Campinia (Italy). Political Geography 67: 46–55.

21.

Dhara

(2008) Nandigram revisited. Infochange, April. Available at: http://www.infochangeindia.org/agenda-issues/battles-over-land/7050-nandigram-revisited-the-scars-of-battle.html (accessed 5 April 2020).

22.

Dutta

(2015) Right and the ‘Left.’. Kolkata: Setu Prakashani.

23.

Elden

(2010) Land, terrain, territory. Progress in Human Geography 34(6): 799–817.doi:10.1177/0309132510362603

24.

Escobar

(2008) Territories of Difference. Durham: Duke University Press.

25.

Fernandes

(2004) The politics of forgetting. Urban Studies 41(12): 2415–2430.

26.

Gangopadhyay

(2008) A tradition of resistance. In: Ray

(ed.), Nandigram and Beyond. Kolkata: Gangchil , 55–68.

27.

Ghosh

(2007) Rasta Khora, Bridge Bhanga, Manush Krodhey Phutchey, Dhuktei Parlaam Na Nandigramer Bhitore. Dainik Statesman, 6 January.

28.

Goswamy

(2007) Nandigram gets Singur jitters. The Statesman, 15 November.

29.

Goswamy

Thakur

(2007) CPM shadow on 6 Nandigram deaths. The Statesman, 7 January.

30.

Government of India (2011) Census of India. Available at: http://censusindia.gov.in/2011-Common/CensusData2011.html (accessed 5 April 2020).

31.

Government of West

Bengal

(1978) Industrial policy for West Bengal. Social Scientist 6(6/7): 103–108.doi:10.2307/3516546

32.

Guha

(1989) The Unquiet Woods. Delhi: Oxford University Press.

33.

Government of West Bengal (2003) The West Bengal special economic zone act.

34.

Government of West Bengal (n.d.). West Bengal Industrial Policy. Available at: http://www.smallindustry-india.com/policies/state/westbengal/ipwb.htm (accessed 6 June 2020).

35.

Guha

(2007) Land, Law and the Left. New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company.

36.

Guruswamy

Sharma

Mohanty

(2005) Economic growth and development in West Bengal. Economic and Political Weekly 40(21): 2151–2157.

37.

Halvorsen

Fernandes

BM.

Torres

(2019) Mobilizing territory. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 109(5): 1454–1470.

38.

Hanstad

Brown

(2001) Land Reform Law and Implementation in West Bengal. Rural Development Institute Reports on Foreign Aid and Development 112. Seattle: Rural Development Institute.

39.

Haq

(2008) Gana Abbhyuthaner Aloke Nandigram [Illuminating Popular Rebellion in Nandigram]. Kolkata: Ashwamedha.

40.

Hindustan Times (2007) Battlefield nandigram. Hindustan Times, 4 January.

41.

Independent Citizen’s Report (2008) Territorial warfare to reign of terror. 8 March. Available at: http://development-dialogues.blogspot.com/2008/03/final-report-of-independent-citizens.html (accessed 5 April 2020).

42.

Indo-Asian News Service (2007a) Jamiat hits back at Buddhadeb, calls him ignorant. IANS, 8 January.

43.

Indo-Asian News Service (2007b) Trinamool-maoist nexus behind Nandigram. IANS, 18 March.

44.

Indo-Asian News Service (2007c) Villager protesting land acquisition shot dead in West Bengal. IANS, 7 January.

45.

Jana

(2007a) Again, 20 years on. The Telegraph, 4 January.

46.

Jana

(2007b) Mobilization and mayhem hitback men and motive. The Telegraph, 7 January.

47.

Jenkins

(2011) The politics of India’s special economic zones. In:

Ruparelia

Reddy

Harriss

et al. (eds) Understanding India’s New Political Economy. New York: Routledge , 49–65.

48.

Jones

(2009) Negotiating development. Dissertation, University of Florida.

49.

Joronen

Griffiths

(2019) The affective politics of precarity. Environment and Planning D 37(3): 1–16.

50.

Kamboj

(2007a) Battle to save land of plenty. The Telegraph, 6 January.

51.

Kamboj

(2007b) Farmers turn ‘border’ guards. The Telegraph, 9 January.

52.

Kamboj

(2007c) Land precious than sons. The Telegraph, 8 January.

53.

Kennedy

(2013) The Politics of Economic Restructuring in India. New Delhi: Routledge.

54.

Kohli

(1989) The State and Poverty in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

55.

Kohli

(ed.) (2001) The Success of India’s Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

56.

Krishnan

Naga

(2017) ‘Ecological warriors’ versus indigenous performers. Journal of South Asian Studies 40(4): 878–894.

57.

Lahiri

DP.

Ghosh

(2006) Our land, their development. In: IMSE (ed.), Battle of Singur. Kolkata: IMSE and PCFS, 9–30.

58.

Levien

(2011) Special economic zones and accumulation by dispossession in India. Journal of Agrarian Change 11(4): 454–483.doi:10.1111/j.1471-0366.2011.00329.x

59.

Levien

(2012) The land question. Journal of Peasant Studies 39(3/4): 933–969.

60.

Levien

(2013a) The politics of dispossession. Politics & Society 41(3): 351–394.doi:10.1177/0032329213493751

61.

Levien

(2013b) Regimes of dispossession. Development and Change 44(2): 381–407.

62.

(2014) What is land? Transactions in the Institute of British Geographers 39(4): 589–602.

63.

Lieten

(2003) Power, Politics and Rural Development. New Delhi: Manohar.

64.

Madhavan

(2011) Why is land acquisition so controversial? rediff.com, 12 May. Available at: https://www.rediff.com/news/special/special-why-is-land-acquisition-so-controversial/20110512.htm (accessed 6 June 2020).

65.

Manthan Samayiki (2007) Long live people’s resistance in Nandigram. 5 April. Available at: https://www.revolutionarydemocracy.org/nandigram/nandresist.htm (accessed 5 April 2020).

66.

Martin

(2003) “Place-framing” as place-making. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93(3): 730–750.

67.

Massey

(2005) For Space. London: Sage.

68.

Mazumdar

(2005) Does China have problems with funds from capitalist countries? Outlook Magazine, 12 September. Available at: https://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/does-china-have-problems-with-funds-from-capitalist-countries/228547 (accessed 5 April 2020).

69.

McConnochie

(2012) The blessed land. Thesis in History, Victoria University of Wellington.

70.

Miller

BA.

Martin

(2000) Missing geography. In: Miller

BA.

(ed.), Geography and Social Movements. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press , 1–38.

71.

Mitra

(2007) Satkhanda-kochuberia ferry-r launch theke guli chaliyechey CPM. Dainik Statesman, 31 January.

72.

Murphy

(2012) Entente territorial. Environment and Planning D 30(1): 159–172.

73.

Nayar

(2007) Nationalist planning for autarchy and state hegemony. In: Nayar

BR.

(ed.), Globalization and Politics in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press , 161–195.

74.

Nielsen

(2009) Four narratives of a social movement in West Bengal. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 32(3): 448–468.doi:10.1080/00856400903374335

75.

Nielsen

(2010) Contesting India’s development? Forum for Development Studies 37(2): 145–170.

76.

Nielsen

(2015) Law and larai. Journal of Contemporary Asia 45(4): 618–639.

77.

Nielsen

(2018) Land Dispossession and Everyday Politics in Rural Eastern India. London: Anthem Press.

78.

Nielsen

KB.

Bedi

(2017) The regional identity politics of India’s new land wars. Environment and Planning A 49(10): 2324–2341.

79.

Pashchimbanga Khet Majoor Samity (PBKMS) (2007) People’s uprising against forced land acquisition. Available at: http://khetmajoorsamity.blogspot.com/2011/05/all-disquiet-on-nandigram-front.html (accessed 5 April 2020).

80.

Pedersen

(2001) India’s industrial dilemmas in West Bengal. Asian Survey 41(4): 646–668.doi:10.1525/as.2001.41.4.646

81.

Peluso

NL.

Lund

(2011) New frontiers of land control. The Journal of Peasant Studies 38(4): 667–681.

82.

Polanyi

(1944) The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.

83.

Raffestin

Butler

(2012) Space, Territory, and territoriality. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 30(1): 121–141.doi:10.1068/d21311

84.

Ray

(2008) Foreword. In: Ray

(ed.), Nandigram and Beyond. Kolkata: Gangchil , 5–16.

85.

Ray

(2010) The political geography of special economic zones in India. Sanhati, 27 October. Available at: http://sanhati.com/excerpted/2896/ (accessed 5 April 2020).

86.

Rediff India Abroad (2007) What Buddhadeb says on nandigram violence. Rediff India Abroad, Updated 15 March, 23.35 IST. Available at: http://www.rediff.com/news/2007/mar/15nandi.htm (accessed 5 April 2020).

87.

Report of the People’s Tribunal on Nandigram (RPTN) (2007) Nandigram. Delhi: Daanish Books.

88.

Routledge

(1993) Terrains of Resistance. London: Praeger.

89.

Routledge

(2017) Space Invaders. London: Pluto Press.

90.

Roy

(2008) Nandigram. In: Ray

(ed.), Nandigram and Beyond. Kolkata: Gangchil , 69–86.

91.

Roy

Banerjee

(2017) Documentary on singur–nandigram land movement. 26 May. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9B-W4POmav4&t=15s (accessed 5 April 2020).

92.

Sarkar

(2008) A place called nandigram. In: Ray

(ed.), Nandigram and Beyond. Kolkata: Gangchil , 19–53 , .

93.

Sarkar

Chowdhury

(2009) The meaning of Nandigram. Focaal 2009(54): 73–88.doi:10.3167/fcl.2009.540106

94.

Sengupta

(2009) Communists’ land plan could backfire in India. The New York Times, 2 May. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/03/world/asia/03communists.html (accessed 5 April 2020).

95.

Sinha

(2004) Ideas, interests, and institutions in policy change. In: Jenkins

(ed.), Regional Reflections. Oxford: Oxford University Press , 66–108.

96.

Sinha

(2005) The Regional Roots of Developmental Politics in India. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

97.

Statesman News Service (SNS) (2007a) Nandigram. Statesman News Service, 5 January.

98.

Statesman News Service (SNS) (2007b) Nandigram forms anti-landgrab front. Statesman News Service, 6 January.

99.

Statesman News Service (SNS)/Press Trust of India (PTI) (2007) Another Singur. Statesman News Service/Press Trust of India, 3 January.

100.

Sud

(2014) Governing India’s land. World Development 60(C): 43–56.doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.015

101.

Sundar

(2011) The rule of law and the rule of property. In: Gupta

Sivaramakrishnan

(eds) The State in India After Liberalization. London: Routledge , 175–193.

102.

The Telegraph (2007a) Build-up to bloodbath. The Telegraph, 7 January.

103.

The Telegraph (2007b) Jamait shove to Mamata. The Telegraph, 3 February.

104.

The Telegraph (2007c) Party flies from hawks. The Telegraph, 7 January.

105.

The Telegraph (2007d) Rebels admit resistance role. The Telegraph, 16 November.

106.

WBHDR (2004) West Bengal Human Development Report. Kolkata: Development and Planning Department, Government of West Bengal. Available at: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/india_west_bengal_2004_en.pdf (accessed 6 June 2020).

107.

Zibechi

(2010) Dispersing Power. Oakland: A. K. Press.

108.

Zibechi

(2012) Territories in Resistance. Oakland: A. K. Press.