Rationalities endemic to modernity entail an implicit spatial imaginary of networks. Additionally, modernity envisages nature as an external domain that is discoverable by science and domesticable through technology in order to drive economic productivity. This article examines Grapevine Reservoir as an artifact of modernity. Through an examination of Dallas-based representations of Denton Creek space, we seek to demonstrate that the area was discursively produced as a distal node of the Dallas network: as nothing more than a point-source for urban water. And as water flowed into Dallas, the city flowed outward to Grapevine along the same conduit. We draw on archival data from a major local newspaper during the proposal and construction phases of the reservoir (1921–1954), as well as key government documents prepared by the US Congress and US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) in the 1940s. Texts were subjected to discourse analysis, to examine how urban interests rationalized Denton Creek space.
AhmedWaquar2011. Neoliberal utopia and urban realities in Delhi.ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies10(2).
2.
AhmedWaquar2008. Indigenous communities and their marginalized space in India. In Studies in Indian Economy., ed. GuptaK.R., 188–218. New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers and Distributors.
3.
AngeloH., and WachsmuthD. (2015), Urbanizing Urban Political Ecology: A Critique of Methodological Cityism.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39: 16–27.
4.
BakkerKaren J.2010. Privatizing Water: Governance failure and the world's urban water crisis.New York: Cornell University Press.
5.
CallicottJ.Baird1994. Earth's Insights: A multicultural survey of ecological ethics from the Mediterranean basin to the Australian Outback.Oakland: University of California Press.
6.
CastellsManuel2005. Space of flows, space of places: Materials for a theory of urbanism in the information age.Comparative Planning Cultures:45–63.
7.
CastreeNoel2003. Commodifying what nature?Progress in Human Geography27(3): (Jun 2003): 273–97.
8.
CelioMattia, ScottChristopher A., and GiordanoMark2010. Urban-agricultural water appropriation: The Hyderabad, India case.The Geographical Journal176(Mar 2010): 39–57.
9.
ChangHasok2012. Is water H2O?Evidence, Realism and Pluralism.New York: Springer.
10.
DescartesRené.1996. Meditations on first philosophy: With selections from the objections and replies.New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
GandyM. (2015), From urban ecology to ecological urbanism: an ambiguous trajectory.Area, 47: 150–154
12.
GandyM.2003. Concrete and clay: reworking nature in New York City.Massachusetts: MIT Press.
13.
GandyM.1999. The Paris sewers and the rationalization of urban space.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 24(1), pp. 23–44.
14.
GasteyerStephen, IsaacJad, HillalJane, and WalshSean2012. Water grabbing in colonial perspective: Land and water in Israel/Palestine.Water Alternatives5 (2).
15.
GrahamStephen, and MarvinSimon2001. Splintering urbanism: Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition.New York: Routledge
16.
HardinGarrett1968. The tragedy of the commons.Science.162: 1243–8.
17.
HarveyDavid2003. The new imperialism.New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
HarveyDavid1996. Justice, Nature & the Geography of Distance.Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
19.
HarveyDavid1974. Population, Resources, and the Ideology of Science.New York: Springer.
20.
KaikaMaria2005. City of Flows: Modernity, Nature, and the City.New York: Routledge.
21.
LatourBruno1993. We have never been modern.Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
LefebvreHenri2003. The Urban Revolution.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
24.
LefebvreHenri1991. The Production of Space.Massachusetts: Blackwell
25.
LivermanDiana2004. Who governs, at what scale and at what price? Geography, environmental governance, and the commodification of nature.Annals of the Association of American Geographers94(4): (Dec.): 734–8, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3694091.
PeetRichard, and HartwickElaine1999. Theories of Development: Contentions, Arguments, Alternatives.New York: Guilford.
28.
PritchardSara B.2012. From hydroimperialism to hydrocapitalism: ‘French’ hydraulics in France, North Africa, and beyond.Social Studies of Science42(4): 591–615.
29.
ReisnerMarc1993. Cadillac Desert: The American west and its disappearing water.New York: Penguin.
30.
RortyRichard2009. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature.New Jersey: Princeton University Press
31.
SheppardEric2002. The spaces and times of globalization: Place, scale, networks, and positionality.Economic Geography78(3): 307–30.
32.
SmithAdam2008. Wealth of Nations.Oxford: Oxford University Press
33.
SmithNeil2008. Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production of Space.Athens: University of Georgia Press.
34.
SmithNeil2007. Nature as accumulation strategy.Socialist Register43: 17–36.
35.
SteinbergPhilip E., and GeorgeE. Clark“Troubled water? Acquiescence, conflict, and the politics of place in watershed management.” Political Geography18, no. 4 (1999): 477–508.
36.
SwyngedouwErik2004. Social Power and the Urbanization of Water: Flows of Power.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
SwyngedouwErik1999. Modernity and hybridity: Nature, regeneracionismo, and the production of the spanish waterscape, 1890–1930.Annals of the Association of American Geographers89(3): 443–65.
38.
The Grapevine Historical Society, with Joe Ann Standlee and Margaret Rains Harper.2010. Grapevine: Images of America.Charleston SC: Arcadia Publishing.
