Purpose,Preparation,and Perseverance: A Phenomenological Case Study for a Principal Efficacy Framework in High-Performing,High-Poverty Elementary Schools

Abstract

The purpose of this phenomenological case study was to explore the characteristics of the principal of a successful, high-performing, high-poverty elementary school. Researcher observations and interview data indicated that the principal of one high-poverty, high-performing elementary school in a large suburban school district engaged in moral and adaptive leadership. Findings further indicated that teachers and staff had observed the principal practicing engagement and presence in the school and in the school’s community to achieve an orderly environment characterized by effective instruction. Implications of the findings are presented to offer guidance to principals who serve in high-poverty schools.

Keywords

case study approach coaching distributed leadership instructional leadership leadership for school improvement leadership identity leadership preparation standards principal preparation leadership and learning leadership theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baker

B. D.

(2014). America’s most financially disadvantaged school districts and how they got that way: How state and local governance causes school funding disparities. Center for American Progress.

Brooks-Gunn

Duncan

G. J.

(1997). The effects of poverty on children. The Future of Children, 7(2) 55–71.

Charner-Laird

Johnson

S. M.

Kraft

M. A.

Papay

J. P.

Reinhorn

S. K.

(2016). Gauging goodness of fit: Teachers’ assessments of their instructional teams in high-poverty schools. Retrieved from: https://projectngt.gse.harvard.edu/files/gse-projectngt/files/gauging_goodness_of_fit_0622916.pdf

Coley

R. J.

Baker

(2013). Poverty and education: Finding the way forward. Educational Testing Service Center for Research on Human Capital and Education.

Deal

T. E.

Peterson

K. D.

(1990). The principal’s role in shaping school culture. US Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

Dyson

M. R.

(2014). Promise zones, poverty, and the future of public schools: Confronting the challenges of socioeconomic integration & school culture in high-poverty schools. Michigan State Law Review, 711–736.

Finch

M. A.

(2017). Tennessee to the top: One state’s pursuit to win race to the top. Educational Policy, 31(4), 481–517.

Fram

S. M.

(2013). The constant comparative analysis method outside of grounded theory. The Qualitative Report, 18(1), 1–25.

Fullan

(Ed.). (2003). The moral imperative of school leadership. SAGE/Corwin Press.

10.

Fullan

(2014). The principal: Three keys to maximizing impact. Jossey-Bass.

11.

Heifetz

R. A.

(1994). Leadership without easy answers (Vol. 465). Harvard University Press.

12.

Hirn

R. G.

Hollo

Scott

T. M.

(2018). Exploring instructional differences and school performance in high-poverty elementary schools. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 62(1), 37–48.

13.

Jacobson

S. L.

(2008). Leadership for success in high poverty elementary schools. Journal of Educational Leadership, Policy and Practice, 23(1), 3–17.

14.

Kannapel

P. J.

Clements

S. K.

Taylor

Hibpshman

(2005). Inside the black box of high-performing high-poverty schools. Report, Prichard Committee for Academic Excellence.

15.

Kena

Hussar

McFarland

de Brey

Musu-Gillette

Wang

Zhang

Rathbun

WilkinsonFlicker

Diliberti

Barmer

Bullock Mann

Dunlop Velez

(2016). The Condition of Education 2016 (NCES 2016-144). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch

16.

Krasnoff

Leong

Siebersma

(2015). Leadership qualities of effective principals. Education Northwest, 1–10.

17.

Lin

(2017). Towards a World Free from Child Poverty. China Today, p. 12.

18.

McGuinn

(2012). Stimulating reform: Race to the top, competitive grants and the Obama education agenda. Educational Policy, 26(1), 136–159.

19.

Mehta

(2013). Occupational stress and leadership behavior of principals in relation to their emotional intelligence. International Journal of Exclusive Management Research, 3(7), 1–8.

20.

Mendels

Mitgang

L. D.

(2013). Creating strong principals. Educational Leadership, 70(7), 22–29.

21.

Milner

H. R.

IV (2017). Confronting poverty and race in schools and classrooms. Harvard University Press.

22.

Ratcliffe

(2015). Child poverty and adult success. Urban Institute.

23.

Simon

N. S.

Johnson

S. M.

(2015). Teacher turnover in high-poverty schools: What we know and can do. Teachers College Record, 117(3), 1–36.

24.

Ullucci

Howard

(2015). Pathologizing the poor: Implications for preparing teachers to work in high-poverty schools. Urban Education, 50(2), 170–193.

25.

Urick

Bowers

A. J.

(2014). What are the different types of principals across the United States? A latent class analysis of principal perception of leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50 (1), 96–134.

26.

Whitehurst

G. J.

Reeves

R. V.

Rodrigue

(2016). Segregation, race, and charter schools: What do we know? Center on Children and Families at Brookings.