This article describes the incorporation of a pitch presentation early in a Doctor of Education (EdD) program to help pre-candidacy students develop a dissertation in practice topic that has the support of their workplace supervisor in the K-12 or higher education setting. Twenty participating EdD students conducted presentations to “pitch” their study idea to their workplace supervisors, who provided feedback and suggested adjustments to the research plan. Students reflected on the experience of preparing for, conducting, and receiving feedback on their pitch. Qualitative data analysis indicated students gained increased clarity and organization around their topic, as well as higher motivation.
ArchbaldD. (2008). Research versus problem solving for the education leadership doctoral thesis: Implications for form and function. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 704–739.
2.
AudetJ.CouteretP. (2012). Coaching the entrepreneur: Features and success factors. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 19(3), 515–531.
3.
BelzerA.RyanS. (2013). Defining the problem of practice dissertation: Where’s the practice, what’s the problem?Planning and Changing, 44, 195–207.
4.
BlauP. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.
5.
BoyceB. A. (2012). Redefining the EdD: Seeking a separate identity. Quest, 64(1), 24–33.
6.
BussR.ZamboR.ZamboD.WilliamsT. (2014). Developing researching professionals in an EdD program. Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning, 4(2), 137–160.
EricksonD. E.Travick-JacksonC. (2006). Creating community through mentoring. Journal of Urban Learning, Teaching, and Research, 2, 262–270.
13.
Fernández-VázquezJ. S.Álvarez-DelgadoR. C. (2019). The interaction between rational arguments and emotional appeals in the entrepreneurial pitch. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 26(3), 503–520.
14.
GeesaR. L.BrownR. D.McConnellK. R. (2020). Mentoring pathways program for first-year education doctor of education students: Perspectives of a program redesigned for sustainability. Mentoring & Tutoring Partnership in Learning, 28(2), 156–175.
15.
HerrK.AndersonG. L. (2005). The action research dissertation: A guide to faculty and students. SAGE.
16.
HochbeinC.PerryJ. A. (2013). The role of research in the professional doctorate. Planning and Changing, 44(3/4), 181–195.
17.
HoffmanR.PerryJ. (2016). The CPED framework – Tools for change. In PerryJ. (Ed.), The EdD and the scholarly practitioner (pp. 13–27). Information Age Publishing, Inc.
18.
HolleyK. A.CaldwellM. L. (2012). The challenges of designing and implementing a doctoral student mentoring program. Innovative Higher Education, 37(3), 243–253.
19.
HolmesB.TrimbleM.Morrison-DannerD. (2014). Advancing scholarship, team building, and collaboration in a hybrid doctoral program in educational leadership. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC), 11(4), 175–180.
20.
HomansG. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 597–606.
21.
KolbD. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
22.
KumarS.JohnsonM.HardemonT. (2013). Dissertations at a distance: Students’ perceptions of online mentoring in a doctoral program. Journal of Distance Education, 27(1), 1–32.
23.
LevineA. (2005). Educating school leaders. The Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation.
24.
LochmillerC. R.LesterJ. N. (2017). Conceptualizing practitioner-scholarship for educational leadership research and practice. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 12(1), 3–25.
25.
LunsfordL. (2012). Doctoral advising or mentoring? Effects on student outcomes. Mentoring & Tutoring Partnership in Learning, 20(2), 251–270.
26.
MalfroyJ. (2005). Doctoral supervision, workplace research and changing pedagogic practices. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(2), 165–178.
27.
MansfieldK. C.StacyJ. (2017). Preparing practitioners to conduct educational research and evaluation: What the research says and what our experiences taught us. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 12(3), 302–334.
28.
MartinsuoM.TurkulainenV. (2011). Personal commitment, support and progress in doctoral studies. Studies in Higher Education, 36(1), 103–120.
29.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and interpretation. Jossey-Bass.
30.
MertlerC. A. (2017). Action research: Improving schools and empowering educators (5th ed.). SAGE.
31.
MertlerC. A. (2019). Introduction to educational research (2nd ed.). SAGE.
32.
MolmL. D.TakahashiN.PetersonG. (2000). Risk and trust in social exchange: An experimental test of a classical proposition. American Journal of Sociology, 105(5), 1396–1427.
33.
Mou-DanhaS.YakubovaM.Vosen CallensM. (2019). Answering the “who am I” question: Raising students’ sense of self-competence with the 30-second elevator pitch. Communication Teacher, 33(4), 271–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2019.1575434
34.
PerryJ. A.ZamboD.CrowR. (2020). The improvement science dissertation in practice: A guide for faculty, committee members, and their students. Myers Education Press.
35.
SagorR. D.WilliamsC. D. V. (2016). The action research guidebook: A process for pursuing equity and excellence in education (3rd ed.). SAGE.
36.
ShulmanL. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52–59.
37.
ShulmanL. S.GoldeC. M.BueschelA. C.GarabedianK. J. (2006). Reclaiming education’s doctorates: A critique and a proposal. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 25–32.
38.
SpauldingD. T.Hinnant-CrawfordB. N. (2019). Tools for today’s educational leaders: The basic tool box. In CrowR.Hinnant-CrawfordB. N.SpauldingD. T. (Eds.), The educational leader’s guide to improvement science (pp. 13–41). Myers Education Press.
