Principal preparation programs are criticized for failing to produce school leaders who can successfully face the growing complexity of today’s educational leadership. Inasmuch as the literature highlighted systems thinking as beneficial for complex situations, this study aimed to explore how preservice principals, enrolled in a systems thinking course as part of their principal preparation program, would identify practical opportunities to apply systems thinking principles in school leadership. Findings showed that preservice principals considered the characteristic of leading wholes as helpful for instructional leadership (curriculum and community) and the characteristic of adopting a multidimensional view as useful for interpersonal relationships and decision making. Implications and further research are discussed.
AndersonE.ReynoldsA. L. (2015). A policymaker’s guide: Research-based policy for principal preparation program approval and licensure. Charlottesville, VA: The University Council of Educational Administration.
2.
AndrewT. N.PetkovD. (2003). The need for a systems thinking approach to the planning of rural telecommunications infrastructure. Telecommunications Policy, 27, 75-93.
3.
ArnoldR. D.WadeJ. P. (2015). A definition of systems thinking: A systems approach. Procedia Computer Science, 44, 669-678.
4.
ÅströmK. J.MurrayR. M. (2008). Feedback systems: An introduction for scientists and engineers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5.
BenDavid-HadarI. (2016). School finance policy and social justice. International Journal of Educational Development, 46, 166-174.
6.
BlizzardJ.KlotzL.PradhanA.DukesM. (2012). Introducing whole-systems design to first-year engineering students with case studies. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 13, 177-196.
7.
BrownJ. (2012). Systems thinking strategy: The new way to understand your business and drive performance. Bloomington, IN: iUniverse.
8.
ButlerK. (2008). Principal preparation programs. District Administration, 44(10), 66-70.
9.
CabreraD.CabreraL. (2015). Systems thinking made simple: New hope for solving wicked problems. Ithaca, NY: Odyssean.
10.
Capstones—The Israel Institute for School Leadership. (2008). Perception of the principal’s role in the state of Israel: Report by the professional committee to formulate policy recommendations for the ministry of education. Jerusalem, Israel: Avney Rosha.
11.
ChanceP. L. (2005). Engaging communities through vision development: A systems approach to public relations. Journal of School Public Relations, 26, 139-155.
12.
ChecklandP. (1999). Systems thinking, systems practice: Includes a 30-year retrospective. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
13.
ClarkT. (2007). EPIC change: How to lead change in the global age. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
14.
Darling-HammondL.LaPointeM.MeyersonD.OrrM. T.CohenC. (2007). Preparing school leaders for a changing world: Lessons from exemplary leadership development programs. Stanford, CA: Stanford Educational Leadership Institute.
DavidzH. L.NightingaleD. J. (2008). Enabling systems thinking to accelerate the development of senior systems engineers. Systems Engineering, 11, 1-14.
17.
DavisS. H.Darling-HammondL. (2012). Innovative principal preparation programs: What works and how we know. Planning and Changing, 43(1-2), 25-45.
18.
Drago-SeversonE. (2009). Leading adult learning: Supporting adult development in our schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
19.
Drago-SeversonE. (2012). Helping educators grow: Strategies and practices for leadership development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
20.
Drago-SeversonE.Blum-DeStefanoJ.AsgharA. (2013). Learning for leadership: Developmental strategies for building capacity in our schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
21.
DumayX. (2014). How do teachers coordinate their work? A framing approach. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27, 88-109.
22.
DuncanH.RangeB.ScherzS. (2011). From professional preparation to on-the-job development: What do beginning principals need?International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 6, 1-20.
23.
DyehouseM.BennettD.HarborJ.ChildressA.DarkM. (2009). A comparison of linear and systems thinking approaches for program evaluation illustrated using the Indiana interdisciplinary GK-12. Evaluation and Program Planning, 32, 187-196.
24.
ElmJ. P.GoldensonD. R. (2012). The business case for systems engineering study: Results of the systems engineering effectiveness survey. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
25.
EtheringtonK. (2004). Becoming a reflexive researcher: Using our selves in research. London, England: Jessica Kingsley.
26.
EwyE. W. (2009). Stakeholder-driven strategic planning in education: A practical guide for developing and deploying successful long-range plans. Milwaukee, WI: American Society for Quality.
27.
FleckF. (2008). The balanced principal: Joining theory and practical knowledge. Education Digest, 73(5), 27-31.
28.
FlemingP.AmesburyM. (2012). The art of middle management: A guide to effective subject, year and team leadership. New York, NY: Routledge.
29.
FordA. (2009). Modeling the environment (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Island Press.
30.
FullanM. (2005). Leadership & sustainability: System thinkers in action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
31.
FullanM. (2014). The principal: Three keys to maximizing impact. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
32.
GharajedaghiJ. (2011). Systems thinking: Managing chaos and complexity: A platform for designing business architecture (3rd ed.). Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
GutmoreD. (2015). Principal preparation—Revisited—Time matters. AASA Journal of Scholarship & Practice, 12(3), 4-10.
35.
HallingerP.LuJ. (2013). Learner centered higher education in East Asia: Assessing the effects on student engagement. International Journal of Educational Management, 27, 594-612.
36.
Hammersley-FletcherL.StrainM. (2011). Power, agency and middle leadership in English primary schools. British Educational Research Journal, 37, 871-884.
37.
HannawayJ.HamiltonL. (2009). Performance-based accountability policies: Implications for school and classroom practices. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
38.
HargreavesA.BraunH. (2013). Data-driven improvement and accountability. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center.
39.
HattieJ. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London, England: Routledge.
40.
HengM. A.MarshC. J. (2009). Understanding middle leaders: A closer look at middle leadership in primary schools in Singapore. Educational Studies, 35, 525-536.
41.
HernandezR.RobertsM.MenchacaV. (2012). Redesigning a principal preparation program: A continuous improvement model. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 7, 1-12.
42.
HieronymiA. (2013). Understanding systems science: A visual and integrative approach. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 30, 580-595.
43.
HobanD. F. (2002). Teacher learning for educational change: A systems thinking approach. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
44.
HolmesB. J.FinegoodD. T.RileyB. L.BestA. (2012). Systems thinking in dissemination and implementation research. In BrownsonR. C.ColditzG. A.ProctorE. K. (Eds.), Dissemination and implementation research in health: Translating science to practice (pp. 175-191). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
45.
HungW. (2008). Enhancing systems-thinking skills with modelling. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 1099-1120.
46.
IngersollR. M.CollinsG. J. (2017). Accountability and control in American schools. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49, 75-95.
JollyR. (2015). Systems thinking for business: Capitalize on structures hidden in plain sight. Portland, OR: Systems Solutions Press.
49.
KeatonS. A.BodieG. D. (2011). Explaining social constructivism. Communication Teacher, 25, 192-196.
50.
KenslerL. A. W.ReamesE.MurrayJ.PatrickL. (2011). Systems thinking tools for improving evidence-based practice: A cross-case analysis of two high school leadership teams. High School Journal, 95(2), 32-53.
51.
LeischowS. J.BestA.TrochimW. M.ClarkP. I.GallagherR. S.MarcusS. E.MatthewsE. (2008). Systems thinking to improve the public’s health. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(Suppl. 2), S196-S203.
52.
LemleyJ. B.SchumacherG.VeseyW. (2014). What learning environments best address 21st-century students’ perceived needs at the secondary level of instruction?NASSP Bulletin, 98, 101-125.
53.
LevinT.LevinI. (2013). Evaluating the pedagogical potential of hybrid models. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 32, 303-320.
54.
LindlofT. R.TaylorB. C. (2010). Qualitative communication research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55.
LynchJ. M. (2012). Responsibilities of today’s principal: Implications for principal preparation programs and principal certification policies. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 31(2), 40-47.
56.
MarloweB. A.PageM. L. (2005). Creating and sustaining the constructivist classroom (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
57.
MendelsP.MitgangL. D. (2013). Creating strong principals. Educational Leadership, 70(7), 22-29.
58.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
59.
MilesM. B.HubermanM. A.SaldañaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60.
MitchellR. M.TarterC. J. (2011). A systems approach to effectiveness in Catholic elementary schools: A replication and extension. Journal of School Leadership, 21, 789-818.
61.
NgF. S. D. (2015). Leadership learning for complex organizations. Cogent Education, 2(1), Article 1017312.
OrtlippM. (2008). Keeping and using reflective journals in the qualitative research process. The Qualitative Report, 13, 695-705.
65.
OrtonJ. D.WeickK. E. (1990). Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 15, 203-223.
66.
PannellS.Peltier-GlazeB. M.HaynesI.DavisD.SkeltonC. (2015). Evaluating the effectiveness of traditional and alternative principal preparation programs. Journal of Organizational & Educational Leadership, 1(2), Article 3.
67.
PellegrinoJ. W.HiltonM. L. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
68.
PowellK. C.KalinaC. J. (2009). Cognitive and social constructivism: Developing tools for an effective classroom. Education, 130, 241-250.
69.
PryorF. L. (2008). System as a causal force. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 67, 545-559.
70.
ReedC. J.KenslerL. A. W. (2010). Creating a new system for principal preparation: Reflections on efforts to transcend tradition and create new cultures. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 5, 568-582.
71.
RichardsL.MorseJ. M. (2013). README FIRST for a user’s guide to qualitative methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
72.
RichmondB. (1994). Systems thinking/system dynamics: Let’s just get on with it. System Dynamics Review, 10, 135-157.
73.
SchechterC. (2011). Switching cognitive gears: Problem-based learning and successbased learning as an instructional framework in leadership education. Journal of Educational Administration, 49, 143-165.
74.
SengeP. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art & practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Currency, Doubleday.
75.
SengeP. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art & practice of the learning organization (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Currency, Doubleday.
76.
SengeP. M.Cambron-McCabeN.LucasT.SmithB.DuttonJ.KleinerA. (2012). Schools that learn: A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education. New York, NY: Crown.
77.
ShakedH.SchechterC. (2014). Systems school leadership: Exploring an emerging construct. Journal of Educational Administration, 52, 792-811.
78.
ShakedH.SchechterC. (2016). Sources of systems thinking in school leadership. Journal of School Leadership, 26, 468-494.
79.
ShakedH.SchechterC. (2017). Systems thinking for school leaders: Holistic leadership for excellence in education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
80.
StevensR. (2012). Identifying 21st century capabilities. International Journal of Learning and Change, 6, 123-137.
81.
TaberT. D. (2007). Using metaphors to teach organization theory. Journal of Management Education, 31, 541-554.
82.
TaubmanP. M. (2009). Teaching by numbers: Deconstructing the discourse of standards and accountability in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
83.
TaylorS. L.BogdanR.DeVaultM. L. (2016). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
84.
TejedaJ.FerreiraS. (2014). Applying systems thinking to analyze wind energy sustainability. Procedia Computer Science, 28, 213-220.
85.
ThorpeA.Bennett-PowellG. (2014). The perceptions of secondary school middle leaders regarding their needs following a middle leadership development programme. Management in Education, 28, 52-57.
86.
ThurstonE. K. (2000). Enabling systems thinking in the “mesonic millennium”: The need for systemic methodologies for conceptual learning in undergraduate management education. Journal of Management Education, 24, 10-31.
87.
TracyS. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
WeickK. E. (1982). Management of organizational change among loosely coupled elements. In GoodmanP. S. (Ed.), Change in organizations (pp. 375-408). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
91.
WellsC.KeaneW. G. (2008). Building capacity for professional learning communities through a systems approach: A toolbox for superintendents. AASA Journal of Scholarship & Practice, 4(4), 24-32.
92.
WilliamsS. M. (2015). The future of principal preparation and principal evaluation: Reflections of the current policy context for school leaders. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 10, 222-225.
93.
WilsonB.Van HaperenK. (2015). Soft systems thinking, methodology and the management of change. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
94.
ZmudaA.KuklisR.KlineE. (2004). Transforming schools: Creating a culture of continuous improvement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
95.
ZonnenshainA. (2012, July). Can we train for systems thinking?The 22nd Annual International Symposium of INCOSE—International Council of Systems Thinking, Rome, Italy. Retrieved from http://incose.org/symp2012/download/abstract/panel_5.pdf
96.
ZulaufC. A. (2007). Learning to think systemically: What does it take?Learning Organization, 14, 489-498.
