The Uncharted Nature of Licensure Requirements for Charter School Principals: Implications and Possibilities for Policy Action

Abstract

The authors drew upon state policy documents and other public sources to review licensure requirements for charter school principals. The results indicate that few states have adopted licensure requirements for charter school principals compared with traditional public school principals, and many exempt charter school principals from licensure altogether. They found that training and support for charter school principals is available, but is concentrated in the states with the highest number of charter schools. These findings have significant implications for policy makers, charter school advocates, and authorizers. These implications are discussed and related to the existing literature regarding principal preparation and licensure.

Keywords

charter schools charter school policy principal licensure principal preparation school leadership standards

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

J. E.

Copland

M. A.

(2005). When learning counts: Rethinking licenses for school leaders. Seattle, WA: Center for Reinventing Public Education. Retrieved from http://www.crpe.org/publications/when-learning-counts-rethinking-licenses-school-leaders

Allen

Gawlik

(2009). Preparing district and charter school leaders: A systems perspective. NCPEA Educational Leadership Review, 10(2), 21-30.

Anderson

Reynolds

(2015). The state of state policies for principal program approval and candidate licensure. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 10, 193-221.

Baker

Punswick

Belt

(2010). School leadership stability, principal moves, and departures: Evidence from Missouri. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46, 523-555.

Barnett

B. G.

(2005). Transferring learning from the classroom to the workplace: Challenges and implications for educational leadership preparation. Educational Considerations, 32, 6-16.

Battle

Gruber

(2010). Principal attrition and mobility: Results from the 2008-09 principal follow-up survey (NCES 2010-337). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Bickmore

D. L.

Dowell

M. M. S.

(2011). Concerns, use of time, and the intersections of leadership: Case study of two charter school principals. Research in the Schools, 18(1), 44-61.

Bickmore

D. L.

Dowell

M. M. S.

(2015). A case study of middle grades leadership in a conversion charter school. NASSP Bulletin, 99, 43-69.

Branch

G. F.

Hanushek

E. A.

Rivkin

S. G.

(2013). School leaders matter. Education Next, 13, 63-69.

10.

Briggs

Cheney

G. R.

Davis

Moll

K. A.

(2013). Operating in the dark: What outdated state policies and data gaps mean for effective school leadership. Dallas, TX: George W. Bush Institute. Retrieved from http://www.bushcenter.org/publications/resources-reports/reports/operating-in-the-dark-what-outdated-state-policies-and-data-gaps-mean-for-effective-school-leadership.html

11.

Campbell

(2010). You’re leaving? Sustainability and succession in charter schools. Center on Reinventing Public Education. Retrieved from https://www.crpe.org/sites/default/files/pub_ICS_Succession_Nov10_web_0.pdf

12.

Campbell

Gross

(2008). Working without a safety net: How charter school leaders can best survive on the high wire. Seattle, WA: National Charter School Research Project, Center for Reinventing Public Education. Retrieved from http://www.crpe.org/publications/working-without-safety-net-how-charter-school-leaders-can-best-survive-high-wire

13.

Campbell

Grubb

B. J.

(2008). Closing the skill gap: New options for charter school leadership development. Seattle, WA: National Charter School Research Project, Center for Reinventing Public Education. Retrieved from http://www.crpe.org/publications/closing-skill-gap-new-options-charter-school-leadership-development

14.

Carpenter

D. M.

Peak

(2013). Leading charters: How charter school administrators define their roles and their ability to lead. Management in Education, 27, 150-158. doi:10.1177/0892020613487919

15.

Center for Educational Reform. (2015). The state of charter schools: What we know—and what we do not—about performance and accountability. Retrieved from https://www.edreform.com/2011/12/charter-school-closure-report/

16.

Center for Research on Educational Outcomes. (2013). National charter school study. Stanford, CA: Center for Research on Educational Outcomes, Stanford University.

17.

Cetinkaya

(2016). A phenomenological narrative study: Elementary charter school principals’ managerial roles. Education Leadership Review, 17, 89-99.

18.

Cordeiro

Cunningham

(2013). Educational leadership: A bridge to improved practice. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

19.

Darling-Hammond

LaPointe

Meyerson

Orr

M. T.

Cohen

(2007). Preparing leaders for a changing world: Lessons from exemplary leadership development programs. Stanford, CA: Stanford Educational Leadership Institute.

20.

Davis

Darling-Hammond

LaPointe

Meyerson

(2005). Review of research. School leadership study. Developing successful principals. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Educational Leadership Institute.

21.

Dobbie

Fryer

R. G.

Jr. (2011). Are high-quality schools enough to increase achievement among the poor? Evidence from the Harlem Children’s Zone. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3(3), 158-187.

22.

Donmoyer

Donmoyer-Yennie

Galloway

(2012). The search for connections across principal preparation, principal performance, and student achievement in an exemplary principal preparation program. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 7, 5-43. doi:10.1177/1942775112440631

23.

Dressler

(2001). Charter school leadership. Education and Urban Society, 33, 170-185.

24.

Furgeson

Gill

Haimson

Killewald

McCullough

Nichols-Barrer

. . . Hill

(2012). Charter-school management organizations: Diverse strategies and diverse student impacts. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.

25.

Gawlik

(2016). The U.S. charter school landscape: Extant literature, gaps in research, and implications for the U.S. educational system. Global Education Review, 3(2), 50-83.

26.

Goldstein

(2015). The teacher wars. New York, NY: Anchor Books.

27.

Gross

Pochop

K. M.

(2007). Leadership to date, leadership tomorrow: A review of data on charter school directors. Seattle: Center on Reinventing Public Education, Daniel J. Evans School of Public Affairs, University of Washington.

28.

Hajer

(2003). Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences, 36, 175-195.

29.

Hallinger

Heck

R. H.

(1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9, 157-191.

30.

Hess

F. M.

Kelly

A. P.

(2007). Learning to lead: What gets taught in principal-preparation programs. Teachers College Record, 109, 244-274.

31.

Horng

Loeb

(2010). New thinking about instructional leadership. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(3), 66-69.

32.

Hoxby

C. M.

Murarka

Kang

(2009). How New York City’s charter schools affect achievement. Cambridge, MA: New York City Charter Schools Evaluation Project.

33.

Kahlenberg

R. D.

(2007). Tough liberal: Albert Shanker and the battles over schools, unions, race, and democracy. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

34.

King-Rice

(2010, April). Principal effectiveness and leadership in an era of accountability: What research says (Calder Brief 8). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/research/publication/principal-effectiveness-and-leadership-era-accountability-what-research-says

35.

Leithwood

K. A.

Louis

K. S.

(2012). Linking leadership to student learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

36.

Leithwood

K. A.

Seashore

L. K.

Anderson

Wahlstrom

(2004). How leadership influences student learning. New York, NY: The Wallace Foundation.

37.

Levinson

Sutton

(2001). Introduction: Policy as/in practice—Sociocultural approach to the study of educational policy. In Sutton

Levinson

(Eds.), Policy as practice: A sociocultural approach to the study of educational policy (pp. 1-21). Westport, CT: Ablex Press.

38.

Louis

K. S.

Leithwood

Wahlstrom

Anderson

(2010). Investigating the links to improve student learning: Final report of research findings. New York, NY: The Wallace Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/Documents/Investigating-the-Links-to-Improved-Student-Learning.pdf

39.

Lynch

J. M.

(2012). Responsibilities of today’s principal: Implications for principal preparation programs and principal certification policies. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 31(2), 40-47.

40.

Marzano

Waters

McNulty

(2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

41.

National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. (2015). Estimated number of public charter schools & students, 2014-2015. Retrieved from http://www.charterschoolcenter.org/sites/default/files/Estimated%20Number%20of%20Public%20Charter.pdf

42.

National Policy Board for Educational Administration. (2015). Professional standards for educational leaders 2015. Reston, VA: Author.

43.

National Policy Board for Educational Administration. (2016). Professional Standards for Educational Leaders (PSEL), National Policy Board for Educational Administration standards. Retrieved from http://npbea.org/psel/

44.

Sun

Rorrer

(2014). Principal turnover: Upheaval and uncertainty in charter schools? Educational Administration Quarterly, 51, 409-437.

45.

Orr

M. T.

(2011). Pipeline to preparation to advancement: Graduates’ experiences in, through, and beyond leadership preparation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 114-172.

46.

Orr

M. T.

Silverberg

LeTendre

(2006, April). Comparing leadership development from pipeline to preparation to advancement: A study of multiple institutions’ leadership preparation programs. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

47.

Roach

Smith

L. W.

Boutin

(2011). School leadership policy trends and developments: Policy expediency or policy excellence? Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 71-113.

48.

Spencer Foundation & Public Agenda. (2015). Charter schools in perspective: A guide to research. Retrieved from http://www.in-perspective.org/pages/a-guide-to-research

49.

Sun

(2015). Work environments and labor markets: Explaining principal turnover gap between charter schools and traditional public schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52, 144-183.

50.

Wallace Foundation. (2009). Assessing the effectiveness of school leaders: New directions and new processes. Retrieved from http://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/Documents/Assessing-the-Effectiveness-of-School-Leaders.pdf

51.

Wallace Foundation. (2012). Perspective—The making of the principal: Five lessons in leadership training. Retrieved from http://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/Documents/The-Making-of-the-Principal-Five-Lessons-in-Leadership-Training.pdf

52.

Waters

J. T.

Marzano

R. J.

McNulty

B. A.

(2003). Balanced leadership: What 30 years of research tells us about the effect of leadership on student achievement. Aurora, CO: Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning.

53.

Weimer

(2009). Making education research more policy analytic. In Sykes

Schneider

Plank

(Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 93-100). New York, NY: Routledge.

54.

Welch

M. L.

(2002). A comparative study of the role of the principal in conventional public schools and in charter schools (Doctoral dissertation). Rossier School of Education, University of Southern California. Retrieved from http://cdm15799.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p15799coll16/id/546325

55.

Young

M. D.

Mawhinney

(Eds.). (2012). The research base supporting the ELCC standards. Charlottesville, VA: University Council for Educational Administration.