This article analyzes specific uses of digital video production in the field of educational leadership preparation, advancing a three-part framework that includes the use of video in (a) teaching and learning, (b) research methods, and (c) program evaluation and service to the profession. The first category within the framework examines videos produced by students and/or faculty to advance student-centered and reflective learning practices. The second category describes methods for research in leadership education through production of videos or documentary films. The third category explores videos created to evaluate programs or to share innovations within the field. This article includes web links to 23 video examples with guidelines for readers to practice video production within each category.
Angay-CrowderT.ChoiJ.YiY. (2013). Putting multiliteracies into practice: Digital storytelling for multilingual adolescents in a summer program. TESL Canada Journal, 30(2), 36-45.
2.
ArmstrongV.CuranS. (2006). Developing a collaborative model of research using digital video. Computers & Education, 46, 336-347.
3.
Blackwell-FlanaganR. (2013). Comparing U.S. and England educational leadership. Tampa: University of South Florida.
4.
BradenS. (1999). Using video for research and representation: Basic human needs and critical pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology, 24, 117-129.
5.
Brooks-YoungS. (2009). Making technology standards work for you: A guide for school administrators. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
6.
CousinsB.ChouinardJ. (Eds.). (2012). Participatory evaluation up close: An integration of research-based knowledge. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
7.
CousinsB.EarlL. (1992). The case for participatory evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14, 397-418.
8.
CubanL. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
CunsoloW.HarperS.EdgeV. (2013). Storytelling in a digital age: Digital storytelling as an emerging narrative method for preserving and promoting indigenous oral wisdom. Qualitative Research, 13, 127-147.
10.
Darling-HammondL.MeyersonD.LaPointeM.OrrM. (2010). Preparing principals for a changing world: Lessons from effective school leadership programs. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
11.
DreonO.KerperR.LandisJ. (2011). Digital storytelling: A tool for teaching and learning in the YouTube generation. Middle School Journal, 42(5), 4-9.
12.
EarlL.CousinsB. (1995). Participatory evaluation in education: Studies of evaluation use and organizational learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
ErstadO.SilsethK. (2008). Agency in digital storytelling: Challenging the educational context. In LundbyK. (Ed.), Digital storytelling, mediatized stories: Self-representations in new media (pp. 213-232). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
14.
ErstadO.WertschJ. (2008). Digital storytelling, mediatized stories: Self-representations in new media. In LundbyK. (Ed.), Digital Storytelling, mediatized stories: Self-representations in new media (Vol. 52, pp. 213-232). New York. Peter Lang.
15.
FormanJ. (2007). Leaders as storytellers: Finding Waldo. Business Communication Quarterly, 70, 369-374.
16.
FriedmanT. (2007). The world is flat 3.0: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
17.
FriendJ. (2013). UCEA 2012 Convention Film Festival dialogue: Three big ideas for utilizing video in educational leadership preparation programs. UCEA Review, 54(1), 43-44.
18.
FriendJ.AdamsA.CurryG. (2011). Breaking news: Utilizing video simulations to improve educational leaders’ public speaking skills. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 6, 234-249. doi:10.1177/194277511100600509
19.
FriendJ.ButnerB. (Producers). (2012). The life & legacy of Dr. Eugene E. Eubanks: 1938-2011 [Video]. United States: University of Missouri–Kansas City.
20.
FriendJ.CaruthersL. (2006). What kids love and hate about school [Video]. United States: Big Atom Productions.
21.
FriendJ.CaruthersL. (2009). Cognitive and affective reform in urban elementary schools: Listening to the voices of children. Urban Learning, Teaching, and Research, 29, 30-64.
22.
FriendJ.RichardJ. (Producers). (2013). eLearning in superintendent preparation [Video]. United States: University of Missouri-Kansas City.
23.
FriendJ.RiggsJ. (2011). What teens love and hate about school [Video]. Kansas City: University of Missouri–Kansas City.
24.
GadanidisG.BorbaM. (2013). New media and research dissemination: The case of performing mathematics education research. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 22, 25-38.
25.
GauntlettD. (2008). Creative brainwork: Building metaphors of identity for social science research. In LundbyK. (Ed.), Digital storytelling, mediatized stories: Self-representations in new media (pp. 253-269). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
26.
GeeJ. P.GreenJ. L. (1998). Discourse analysis, learning, and social practice: A methodological study. Review of Research in Education, 23, 119-169.
27.
GleickJ. (2000). Faster. New York, NY: Vintage.
28.
GoldmanR. (2007). Video representations and the perspectivity framework: Epistemology, ethnography, evaluation, and ethics. In GoldmanR.PeaR.BarronB.DerryS. J. (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 3-37). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
HadfieldM.HawK. (2012). Modalities and methodologies. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 35, 311-324.
30.
HallR. (2000). Video recording as theory. In LeshD.KelleyA. (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 647-664). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31.
HawK.HadfieldM. (2011). Video in social science research. New York, NY: Routledge.
32.
HennessyS.DeaneyR. (2009). “Intermediate theory” building: Integrating multiple teacher and researcher perspectives through in-depth video analysis of pedagogic strategies. Teachers College Record, 111, 1753-1795.
33.
HjarvardS. (2004). From bricks to bytes: The mediatization of a global toy industry. In BondebjergI.GoldingP. (Eds.), European culture and the media (pp. 43-63). Bristol, UK: Intellect.
34.
HobbsR.DonnellyK.FriesemJ.MoenM. (2013). Learning to engage: How positive attitudes about the news, media literacy, and video production contribute to adolescent civic engagement. Educational Media International, 50, 231-246.
35.
HollingsworthS. (1994). Teacher research & urban literacy education: Lessons & conversations in a feminist key. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
36.
HuberJ.CaineV.HuberM.SteevesP. (2013). Narrative inquiry as pedagogy in education: The extraordinary potential of living, telling, retelling, and reliving stories of experience. Review of Research in Education, 37, 1-31.
JansonC.ParikhS.YoungJ.FudgeL. (2011). Constructing collective understanding in school: Principal and student use of iterative digital reflection. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 6, 162-180. doi:10.1177/194277511100600505
39.
JosephG.BrennanC. (2013). Framing quality: Annotated video-based portfolios of classroom practice by pre-service teachers. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41, 423-430.
40.
JuzwikM. M.SerryM. B.CaughlanS.HeintzA.Borsheim-BlackC. (2012). Supporting dialogically organized instruction in an English teacher preparation program: A video-based, Web 2.0-mediated response and revision pedagogy. Teachers College Record, 114(3), 1-42.
41.
KielerL. (2010). A reflection: Trials in using digital storytelling effectively with the gifted. Gifted Child Today, 33(3), 48-52.
42.
KistW. (2013). New literacies and the Common Core. Educational Leadership, 70(6), 38-43.
43.
LambertJ. (2006). Digital storytelling: Capturing lives, creating community (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: Digital Diner Press.
44.
LampertM.BallD. (1998). Teaching, multimedia, and mathematics. New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
45.
LundbyK. (2008). Introduction: Digital storytelling, mediatized stories. In LundbyK. (Ed.), Digital storytelling, mediatized stories: Self-representations in new media (pp. 1-17). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
46.
MannD.ReardonR. M.BeckerJ. D.ShakeshaftC.BaconN. (2011). Immersive, interactive, web-enabled computer simulation as a trigger for learning: The next generation of problem-based learning in educational leadership. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 6, 272-287.
47.
Maslin-OstrowskiP.AckermanR. H. (2002). The wounded leader: How real leadership emerges in times of crisis. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
48.
MilitelloM.FriendJ. (Eds.). (2013). Principal 2.0: Technology and educational leadership. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
49.
MilitelloM.GuajardoF. (2013). Virtually speaking: How digital storytelling can facilitate organizational learning. Journal of Community Positive Practices, XIII(2), 80-91.
50.
MilitelloM.JansonC.GuajardoE.MilitelloD. (2013). Community Learning Exchange: Annual report. Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership.
51.
MilitelloM.JansonC.MilitelloD. (2014, April). InQuiry: A participant inclusive process for leadership and community development. Paper presented at New Zealand Educational Administration and Leadership Society Annual Conference, Wellington, New Zealand.
52.
MollL.AmantiC.NeffD.GonzálezN. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31, 132-141.
53.
OlsenJ.MilitelloM.FusarelliB. (2013, November). The Northeast Leadership Academy. Video presentation at the Annual Convention of the University Council for Educational Administration, Denver, CO.
54.
OrrM.OrphanosS. (2011). How graduate-level preparation influences the effectiveness of school leaders: A comparison of the outcomes of innovative and conventional leadership preparation programs on principals. Education Administration Quarterly, 40, 18-70.
55.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
PeaR.HayK. (2003). Report to the National Science Foundation: CILT workshop on digital video inquiry in learning and education. Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Innovations in Learning.
58.
PeaR.MillsM.RosenJ.DauberK.EffelsbergW.HoffertE. (2004). The DIVER project: Interactive digital video repurposing. IEEE Multimedia, 11(1), 54-61.
59.
PounderD. (2012). School leadership preparation and practice survey instruments and their uses. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 7, 254-274.
60.
RichP. J.HannafinM. (2009). Video annotation tools: Technologies to scaffold, structure, and transform teacher reflection. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 52-67.
61.
SantagataR.AngeliciG. (2010). Studying the impact of the lesson analysis framework on preservice teachers’ abilities to reflect on videos of classroom teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 339-349.
62.
SchuckS.KearneyM. (2006). Using digital video as a research tool: Ethical issues for researchers. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 15, 447-463.
63.
SchwartzB. (2003). The paradox of choice: Why less is more. New York, NY: Ecco.
64.
ShumanA. (2005). Other people’s stories: Entitlement claims and critiques of empathy. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
65.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
66.
TorresA. R.PonceE. P.PastorM. D. G. (2012). Digital storytelling as a pedagogical tool within a didactic sequence in foreign language teaching. Digital Education Review, 22, 1-18.
YouensB.SmethemL.SullivanS. (2014). Promoting collaborative practice and reciprocity in initial teacher education: Realising a “dialogic space” through video capture analysis. Journal of Education for Teaching, 40, 101-113.
