According to Daresh, collaboration between veteran and new or aspiring leaders can promote an environment that is conducive to high levels of student achievement. This study sought to understand the mentoring relationship between veteran school leaders and aspiring leaders within a district that is in Year 2 of a School Leadership Program grant. Results focused on two main themes: (a) accountability time pressures and (b) development and sustainability of the mentor/mentee relationship. Implications for school district leadership and university leadership preparation programs are discussed.
BlumenfeldP.FishmanB.KrajcikJ.MarxR. W.SolowayE. (2000). Creating useable innovations in systemic reform: Scaling-up technology-embedded project-based science in urban schools. Educational Psychologist, 35, 149-164.
2.
Browne-FerrignoT.MuthR. (2004). Leadership mentoring in clinical practice: Role socialization, professional development, and capacity building. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40, 468-494.
3.
CrosbyF. J. (1999). The developing literature on developmental relationships. In MurrellA. J.CrosbyF. J.ElyR. J. (Eds.), Mentoring dilemmas: Developmental relationships within multicultural organizations (pp. 3-20). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
CrowG. M. (2006). Complexity and the beginning principal in the United States: Perspectives on socialization. Journal of Educational Administration, 44, 310-325.
DareshJ. C. (1992, December). Mentoring programs to support beginning school leaders. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Colorado Association of School Boards, Colorado Springs, CO.
7.
DareshJ. C. (1995). Research base on mentoring for educational leaders: What do we know?Journal of Educational Administration, 33(5), 7-16.
DareshJ. C. (2004). Mentoring school leaders: Professional promise or predictable problems?Educational Administration Quarterly, 40, 495-517.
10.
EarlL.FullanM. (2003). Using data in leadership for learning. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33, 383-394.
11.
EhrichL. C. (1995). Professional mentorship for women educators in government schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 33, 69-83.
12.
EhrichL. C.HansfordB.TennentL. (2004). Formal mentoring programs in education and other professions: A review of the literature. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40, 518-540.
13.
FlemingK. A. (1991). Mentoring: Is it the key to opening doors for women in educational administration?Education Canada, 31(3), 27-33.
14.
FullanM. G.HargreavesA. (1991). What’s worth fighting for? Working together for your school. The Regional Laboratory for Educational Improvement of the Northeast & Islands. Andover, MA.
15.
FusarelliL.SmithL. (1999). Improving urban schools via leadership: Preparing administrators for the new millennium. Journal of School Leadership, 9, 534-551.
16.
GardnerM.EnomotoE.GroganM. (2000). Coloring outside the lines. Albany: State University of New York Press.
17.
GroganM.BredesonP. V.ShermanW. H.PreisS.BeatyD. A. (2009). The design and delivery of leadership preparation. In YoungM.CrowG.MurphyJ.OgawaR. (Eds.), The handbook of research on the education of school leaders (pp. 395-416). New York, NY: Routledge.
18.
HackmannD. G.WanatC. L. (2007). Licensing principals: Iowa’s preparation reform initiative. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 2, 1-36.
19.
KanterR. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York, NY: Basic Books.
20.
LaMagdeleineD.MaxcyB. D.PounderD. G.ReedC. J. (2009). The context of university- based educational leadership preparation. In YoungM. D.CrowG. M.MurphyJ.OgawaR. T. (Eds.), Handbook of research on education of school leaders (pp. 129-156). New York, NY: Routledge.
21.
LevineA. (2005). Educating school leaders. Washington, DC: The Education Schools Project.
22.
McMillanJ. H.MyranS.WorkmanD. (1999). The impact of mandated statewide testing on teachers’ classroom assessment and instructional practices. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (April, 1999), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
23.
Mendez-MorseS. (2004). Constructing mentors: Latina educational leaders’ role models and mentors. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40, 561-590.
24.
MertzN. T. (2004). What’s a mentor anyway?Educational Administration Quarterly, 40, 541-560.
25.
MillsK. A. (2008). Will large-scale assessments raise literacy standards in Australian schools?Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 31, 211-255.
26.
MintropH.TrujilloT. (2005). Corrective action in low-performing schools: Lessons for NCLB implementation from state and district strategies in first-generation accountability systems (CSE Report No. 657). Center for the Study of Evaluation (CSE)/National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
27.
MurphyJ. (2005). Unpacking the foundations of ISLLC standards and addressing concerns in the academic community. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41, 154-191.
28.
MuthR. (2002). Scholar-practitioner goals, practices, and outcomes: What students and faculty need to know and be able to do. Scholar-Practitioner Quarterly, 1, 67-87.
29.
New York City Leadership Academy. (2008). Leadership performance planning worksheet. [Used in grant effort with permission of creators, not available for publication].
30.
NormoreA. (2004). Leadership success in schools: Planning, recruitment, and socialization. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 8(10).
31.
OrtizF. I. (1982). Career patterns in education: Women, men and minorities in public school administration. New York, NY: Praeger.
32.
OrtizF. I. (2000). Who controls succession in the superintendency? A minority perspective. Urban Education, 35, 557-566.
33.
PlaykoM. (1995). Mentoring for educational leaders: A practitioner’s perspective. Journal of Educational Administration, 33, 84-92.
PreisS.GroganM.ShermanW.BeatyD. (2007). What the research says about the delivery of educational leadership preparation programs in the United States. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 2(2), 1-36.
36.
ReskinB. F. (2003). Including mechanisms in our models of ascriptive inequality. American Sociological Review, 68, 1-21.
37.
RyderM. (1994, May/June). Women in educational administration: Breaking the statistical norm. Thrust for Educational Leadership, 23, 28-34.
38.
SamierE. (2000). Public administration mentorship: Conceptual and pragmatic considerations. Journal of Educational Administration, 38, 83-101.
39.
ShermanW. H. (2001, November). Formal leadership/mentoring programs for aspiring administrators and their impact on women. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of Women Education Leaders in Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
40.
ShermanW. H. (2005). Preserving the status quo or renegotiating leadership: Women’s experiences with a district-based aspiring leaders program. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41, 707-740.
41.
ShermanW. H.CrumK. (2008). Navigating the waters of school administration: Women leaders in conversation about mentoring and support. In BeatyD.ShermanW. H.MunozA.PankakeA. (Eds.), Women as school executives: Celebrating diversity. Texas Council of Women School Executive, Tarleton State University Press.
42.
SkinnerT. (2010). Exploration of barriers and solutions for women in the pathway to the high school principalship (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA.
43.
ValverdeL. A. (1980, April). Promotion socialization: The informal process in large urban school districts and its adverse effects on non-Whites and women. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.
44.
WatersT.MarzanoR. J.McNultyB. (2003). Balanced leadership: What 30 years of research tells us about the effect of leadership on student achievement (Working Paper). Mid-continent Regional Educational Laboratory.
45.
WinnA. (1993). Critical factors in preparation and progression in the principalship: A descriptive study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Central Florida, Orlando.
46.
YoungM. D.PetersenG. J.ShortP. M. (2002). The complexity of substantive reform: A call for interdependence among key stakeholders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 137-175.
