This article considers the implications and effectiveness of a performing arts-based pedagogy in the professional development of school leaders. It reports on the findings from a study that exposed educational leaders to methods of dramatic analysis as a means of reflecting on the ethical dilemmas found in personnel management. Through the dynamic enactment of dramatized scripts representing highly charged situations in school leadership, participants came to recognize the limitations of merely discussing cases, the benefits of active learning to developing empathy amid the complexities of schools, and some of the ethical challenges inherent in their roles as school leaders.
AbbsP. (1992). Abbs replies to Bolton. Drama, 1(1), 2-6.
2.
ArgyrisC. (1980). Some limitations of the case method: Experiences in a management development program. Academy of Management Review, 5(2), 291-298.
3.
AshblaughC. R.KastenK. L. (1991). Educational leadership: Case studies for reflective practice. New York, NY: Longman.
4.
BeareD.BelliveauG. (2008). Dialoguing scripted data. In SpringgayS.IrwinR. L.LeggoC.GouzouasisP. (Eds.), Being with a/r/tography (pp. 141-149). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
5.
BegleyP. T. (1999). Values and educational leadership. New York, NY: SUNY.
6.
BegleyP. T. (2004). Understanding valuation processes: Exploring the linkage between motivation and action. International Studies in Educational Administration, 32(2), 4-17.
7.
BegleyP. T. (2005). Ethics matters: New expectations for democratic educational leadership in a global community. University Park, PA: Rock Ethics Institute.
8.
BegleyP. T. (2010). Leading with moral purpose: The place of ethics. In BushT.BellL.MiddlewoodD. (Eds.), The principles of educational leadership and management (2nd ed., pp. 31-54). Washington, DC: SAGE.
9.
BelliveauG.LeaG. W. (2011). Research-based theatre in education. In SchonmannS. (Ed.), Key concepts in theatre/drama education (pp. 333-338). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
10.
BrennanR.AhmadS. J. (2005). Using case studies in management education: The student perspective. International Journal of Management Education, 4(3), 21-30.
11.
BrewerG. D. (1999). The challenges of interdisciplinarity. Policy Sciences, 32, 327-337.
12.
CiullaJ. B. (2007). What is good leadership? In CiullaJ.MartinC.SolomonR. (Eds.), Honest work: A business ethics reader (pp. 533-541). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
13.
ClarkJ.DobsonW.GoodeT.NeelandsJ. (1997). Lessons for the living: Drama and the integrated curriculum. Newmarket, Ontario, Canada: Mayfair Cornerstone.
14.
CrumplerT. P.RogersT.SchneiderJ. J. (2006). Introduction. In JasinskiJ.CrumplerT.RogersT. (Eds.), Process drama and multiple literacies: Addressing social, cultural, and ethical issues (pp. xiii-xx). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
15.
EganK. (1992). Imagination in teaching and learning: The middle school years. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16.
EyalO.BerkovichI.SchwartzT. (2011). Making the right choices: Ethical judgments among educational leaders. Journal of Educational Administration, 49, 396-413.
17.
FrickJ.FrickW. C. (2010). An ethic of connectedness: Enacting moral school leadership through people and programs. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 5, 117-130.
18.
FrickW. C. (2009). Principals’ value-informed decision making, intrapersonal moral discord, and pathways to resolution: The complexities of moral leadership praxis. Journal of Educational Administration, 47, 50-74.
19.
FryH.KetteridgeS.MarshallS. (1999). A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education. Glasgow, UK: Kogan Page.
GrahamA. (2011). Making the case: Writing and using case studies for teaching and knowledge management in public administration. Kingston, Ontario, Canada: Queen’s Policy Studies.
22.
GroszE. (1994). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
23.
GurdB. (2001). The importance and role of management case studies. Management Case Study Journal, 1(1), 1-8.
24.
HallahanD. P.KauffmanJ. M. (2006). Cases for reflection and analysis for exceptional learners: An introduction to special education (10th ed.). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Pearson.
25.
HallingerP.HeckP. H. (2002). What do you call people with visions? The role of vision, mission and goals in school leadership and improvement. In LeithwoodK.HallingerP. (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 9-40). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
26.
Hesse-BiberS. N.LeavyP. (2011). The practice of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
KafatosF. C.EisnerT. (2004). Unification in the century of Biology. Science, 303, 1257. doi:10.1126/science.303.5662.1257
29.
KanaP.AitkenV. (2007). She didn’t ask me about my grandma: Using process drama to explore issues of cultural exclusion and educational leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 45, 697-710.
30.
KatzM.QuillL. (2008). Case study analysis and teaching virtue by storytelling: A comparative assessment. BC Educational Leadership Research e-Journal. Retrieved from http://educ.ubc.ca/BCELRejournal/issue11/
31.
KowalskiT. (2011). Case studies on educational administration (6th ed.). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Pearson.
32.
LeavittH. J. (1991). Socializing our MBAs: Total immersion? Managed cultures? Brainwashing?California Management Review, 33(4), 127-143.
33.
McCammonL. A. (2007). Research on drama and theater for social change. In BreslerL. (Ed.), International handbook of research in arts education (pp. 945-964). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
34.
McMillanJ. H. (2010). Educational research: Fundamentals for the consumer (5th ed.). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Pearson.
35.
McNaughtonM. J. (2004). Educational drama in the teaching of education for sustainability. Environmental Education Research, 10, 139-155.
36.
MeyerM. J. (2004). Theater as representation (TAR) in the teaching of teacher and administrator preparation programs. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 8(6). Retrieved from http://people.ucalgary.ca/~huartson/iejll/volume8/volume8.html
37.
MidlockS. F. (2011). Case studies for educational leadership: Solving administrative dilemmas. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Pearson.
38.
MintzbergH. (2004). Managers not MBAs. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
39.
NicholsonH. (1999). Walking with shadows. In LawrenceC. (Ed.), Canterbury keynotes (pp. 37-44). London, England: National Drama.
40.
NicholsonH. (2005). Applied drama: The gift of theatre. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
41.
O’NeillC. (1995). Drama worlds: A framework for process drama. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
42.
O’TooleJ. (2009). Drama as pedagogy. In O’TooleJ.StinsonM.MooreT. (Eds.), Drama and curriculum: A giant at the door (pp. 97-113). Netherlands: Springer.
43.
Plano ClarkV. L.CreswellJ. W. (2010). Understanding research: A consumer’s guide. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Pearson.
44.
PopperK. R. (1963). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. New York, NY: Routledge.
45.
ReitzugU. C. (2008). Diversity, power and influence: Multiple perspectives on the ethics of school leadership. Journal of School Leadership, 18, 396-420.
46.
RidoutN. (2009). Theatre and ethics. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
47.
RuggieroJ. A. (2002). Ah Ha . . . Learning: Using cases and case studies to teach sociological insights and skills. Sociological Practice: A Journal of Clinical and Applied Sociology, 4, 113-128.
48.
SaldanaJ. (2010). Ethnodramas about health and illness: Staging human vulnerability, fragility and resiliency. In McLeanC.KellyR. (Eds.), Creative arts in interdisciplinary practice: Inquiries for hope and change (pp. 167-184). Calgary, Alberta, Canada: Detselig Temeron.
49.
SawyerA. J.TomlinsonS. R.MapleA. J. (2000). Developing essential skills through case study scenarios. Journal of Accounting Education, 18, 257-282.
50.
ShapiroJ. P.StefkovichJ. A. (2005). Ethical leadership and decision making in education (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51.
ShapiroJ. P.StefkovichJ. A. (2011). Ethical leadership and decision making in education: Applying theoretical perspectives to complex dilemmas (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
52.
SinhaP. N. (2010). The dramatistic genre in leadership studies: Implications for research and practice. Leadership, 6, 185-205. doi:10.1177/1742715010363209
53.
SmithG. (1987). The use and effectiveness of the case study method in management education: A critical review. Management Learning, 18, 51-61. Retrieved from http://mlq.sagepub.com/content/18/1/51
54.
SpolinV. (1963). Improvisation for the theater: A handbook of teaching and directing techniques. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
55.
StarrattR. J. (2004). Ethical leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
56.
StarrattR. J. (2008). Centering educational administration: Cultivating meaning, community, responsibility. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
57.
StrikeK. A.HallerE. J.SoltisJ. F. (2005). The ethics of school administration (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
58.
TakacsD. (2003, Summer). How does your personality bias your epistemology?The NEA Higher Education Journal: Thought & Action, 19(1), 27-38.Retrieved from http://www.nea.org/home/33232.htm#
59.
TuanaN. (2007). Conceptualizing moral literacy. Journal of Education Administration, 45, 364-378.
60.
van MentsM. (1999). The effective use of role play: A handbook for teachers and trainers. London, England: Kogan Page.
