Aspiring leaders in preparation programs need up-to-date research applied in real-life situations. University faculty need to change their understandings of what it means to effectively promote leadership development through university programs. This article presents understandings on how exploratory, field-based coursework offered through a university–school district partnership supported learning for leadership. Qualitative and quantitative data from end-of-class session questionnaires and end-of-course evaluation forms were analyzed. Students emphasized that this pilot project provided opportunities to connect theory and practice, offered collaborative course activities, and gave them “spaces for thought and spaces for action.”
AustinJ. E. (2002). Principles for partnership. In HesselbeinF.JohnstonR. (Eds.), On high performance organizations: A leader to leader guide. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
2.
BarnettB. G.BasomM. R.YerkesD. M.NorrisC. J. (2000). Cohorts in educational leadership programs: Benefits, difficulties, and the potential for developing school leaders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36, 255-282.
3.
BarthR. S. (2001). Learning by heart. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4.
BatesM. (2008). The responsive case study: Action research and action learning in short courses. Educational Action Research, 16, 97-108.
5.
BinghamC. S.GottfriedS. (2003). Leading change in principal development: Notes for the field. Greensboro, NC: South Eastern Regional Vision for Education. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/Home.portal
6.
BradburyH.MirvisP.NeilsenE.PasmoreW. (2008). Action research at work: Creating the future following the path from Lewin. In ReasonP.BradburyH. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (2nd ed., pp. 77-92). London, England: SAGE.
7.
BridgesW. (2000). The way of transition: Embracing life’s most difficult moments. Boston, MA: Da Capo Press.
8.
Browne-FerrignoT. (2007). Developing school leaders: Practitioner growth during an advanced development program for principals and administrator-trained teachers. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 2, 1-30.
9.
BrykA. S.SchneiderB. L. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
10.
ChristieP.LingardR. (2001, April). Capturing complexity in educational leadership. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference, Seattle, WA.
11.
CooperriderD. L.SrivastvaS. (1987). Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. Research in organizational change and development, 1, 129-169.
12.
DanzigA.WrightB.BormanK.JonesB. (Eds.). (2006). Professional development for learner-centered leadership: Policy, research, and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
Darling-HammondL.LaPointeM.MeyersonD.OrrM. (2007). Preparing school leaders for a changing world: Executive summary. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Stanford Educational Leadership Institute.
14.
DeMossK. K.WoodC. J.HowellR. (2006). Eliminating isolation to foster learner centered leadership: Lessons from rural schools and research universities. In DanzigA.WrightB.BormanK.JonesB. (Eds.), Professional development for learner-centered leadership: Policy, research, and practice (pp.149-170). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
DuFourR.DuFourR.EakerR.ManyT. (2010). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional communities at work. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
16.
DuFourR.EakerR.DuFourR. (2005). Closing the knowing-doing gap. In DuFourR.EakerR.DuFourR. (Eds.), On common ground: The power of professional learning communities (pp. 225-254). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
17.
DukeD. (2004). The turnaround principal: High stakes leadership. Principal Magazine, 84, 12-23.
18.
Educational Research Service. (2000). The principal, keystone of a high-achieving school: Attracting and keeping the leaders we need. Washington, DC: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
19.
Educational Resources Information Center. (2002). Engaging the community to support student achievement. Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management. (ERIC Digest No. ED464395 2002-04-00)
20.
ElmoreR. F. (2004). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
21.
EpsteinJ. (2001). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools. Boulder, CO: Westview.
22.
EvansP.MohrN. (1999). Professional development for principals: Seven core beliefs. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 530-532.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson.
25.
FullanM. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
26.
HiebertJ.StiglerJ. W. (2000). A proposal for improving classroom teaching: Lessons from the TIMSS video study. Elementary School Journal, 101, 3-20.
27.
JacksonB. L.KelleyC. (2002). Exceptional and innovative programs in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 192-212.
28.
KolbA. Y.KolbD. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4, 193-212.
29.
KretzmanJ. P.McKnightJ. L. (1993). Building communities from the inside out: A path toward finding and mobilizing a community’s assets. Chicago, IL: ACTA.
30.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2001). Crossing over to Canaan: The journey of new teachers in diverse classrooms. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
31.
LeithwoodK.LouisK. S.AndersonS.WahlstromK. (2004). Review of research: How leadership influences student learning. New York, NY: Wallace Foundation.
32.
LevinH. (2006). Why is educational entrepreneurship so difficult? In HessF. (Ed.), Educational entrepreneurship (pp.165-182). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
33.
LevineA. (2005). Educating school leaders. Washington, DC: Education Schools Project.
34.
MarshallC.OlivaM. (2006). Leadership for social justice: Making revolutions in education. New York. NY: Pearson.
35.
MarzanoR. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
NewmannF. M.SmithB.AllensworthE. (2001). Instructional program coherence: What it is and why it should guide school improvement policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 297-321.
41.
NietoS. M. (1999). The light in their eyes: Creating multicultural learning communities. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
42.
O’ConnellB. (1999). Civil society: The underpinnings of American democracy. Lebanon, NH: Tufts University and University Press of New England.
43.
OlivaM.AndersonG. L. (2006). Dilemmas and lessons: The continuing leadership challenge for social justice. In MarshallC.OlivaM. (Eds.), Leadership for social justice: Making revolutions in education (pp. 279-307). New York, NY: Pearson.
44.
OrrM. T. (2006). Mapping innovation in leadership preparation in our nation’s schools of education. Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 492-499.
45.
OrrM. T. (2011). Pipeline to preparation to advancement: Graduates’ experiences in, through, and beyond leadership preparation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 114-172.
PerezL. G.UlineC. L.JohnsonJ. F.Jr.James-WardC.BasomM. R. (2011). Foregrounding fieldwork in leadership preparation: The transformative capacity of authentic inquiry. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 217-257.
49.
PicucciA. C.BrownsonA.KahlertR.SobelA. (2002). Driven to succeed: High-performing, high-poverty, turnaround middle schools. Volume i: Cross-case analysis of high-performing, high-poverty, turnaround middle schools. Austin: Texas University, Charles A. Dana Center. (Access ERIC: Fulltext 143 Reports–Research)
50.
PorterK.SoperS. (2003). Closing the achievement gap, urban schools: Comprehensive school reform connection. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Comprehensive School Reform. (No. ED 480542)
51.
PutnamR.FeldsteinL. (2003). Better together: Restoring the American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
52.
ReamesE. (2010). Shifting paradigms: Redesigning a principal preparation program’s curriculum. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 5, 436-459.
53.
ReevesD. B. (2006). The learning leader: How to focus school improvement for better results. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
54.
RothsteinR. (2004). Class and schools: Using social, economic, and educational reform to close the Black-White achievement gap. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
55.
SandovalJ.PriorK. R.BookmyerJ. (2003). A closer look at California’s high performing, high poverty and/or high minority schools and learning supports. UC Davis Center for Community School Partnerships, CRESS, School of Education. Davis, CA: UC Davis School of Education.
56.
ScheurichJ.SkrlaL. (2003). Leadership for equity and excellence: Creating high-achievement classrooms, schools, and districts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
57.
ShirleyD. (2002). Valley Interfaith and school reform: Organizing for power in South Texas. Austin: University of Texas Press.
58.
ShulmanL. (1987). Knowledge and teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Innovation and Improvement. (2004). Innovations in education: Innovative pathways to school leadership. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
65.
VillaR. A.ThousandJ. S. (2000). Restructuring for caring and effective education: Piecing the puzzle together (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: P. H. Brooks.
66.
WarrenM. R. (2001). Dry bones rattling: Community building to revitalize American democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
67.
YoungM. D.CrowG.OrrM. T.OgawaR.CreightonT. (2005). An educative look at “educating school leaders.” Retrieved from http://www.ucea.org/
68.
ZandeeD. P.CooperriderD. L. (2008). Appreciable worlds, inspired inquiry. In ReasonP.BradburyH. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (2nd ed., pp. 190-198). London, England: SAGE.
