Intravenous thrombolysis improves outcomes in acute ischemic stroke in a time-dependent fashion. As in teaching hospitals, clinical outcomes may worsen due to the arrival of new inexperienced house staff early in the academic year (July effect, JE), we evaluated the impact of the “JE” on the door-to-needle time for intravenous thrombolysis and other stroke outcomes. In this retrospective cohort study, we assessed all acute ischemic strokes treated with intravenous thrombolysis between July 2003 and June 2016. Among 101 patients, there was no detrimental July effect on the door-to-needle time, rate of thrombolysis within 60 minutes of arrival, thrombolysis of stroke mimics, post-thrombolysis intracranial hemorrhages, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and modified Rankin Scale outcomes.
EmbersonJLeesKRLydenP; Stroke Thrombolysis Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet. 2014;384(9958):1929–1935. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60584-5.
2.
WesterPRådbergJLundgrenBPeltonenM. Factors associated with delayed admission to hospital and in-hospital delays in acute stroke and TIA: a prospective, multicenter study. Seek-Medical-Attention-in-Time Study Group. Stroke. 1999;30(1):40–48. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9880386. Accessed April 4, 2016.
3.
JauchECSaverJLAdamsHP; American Heart Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease; Council on Clinical Cardiology. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44(3):870–947. doi:10.1161/STR.0b013e318284056a.
4.
YoungJQRanjiSRWachterRMLeeCMNiehausBAuerbachAD. “July effect”: impact of the academic year-end changeover on patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(5):309–315. doi:10.1016/j.yped.2011.11.022.
5.
InabaKRecinosGTeixeiraPGR. Complications and death at the start of the new academic year: is there a July phenomenon?J Trauma. 2010;68(1):19–22. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3181b88dfe.
6.
EnglesbeMJPelletierSJMageeJC. Seasonal variation in surgical outcomes as measured by the American College of Surgeons–National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP). Ann Surg. 2007;246(3):456–462. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31814855f2.
7.
PhillipsDPBarkerGEC. A July spike in fatal medication errors: a possible effect of new medical residents. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(8):774–779. doi:10.1007/s11606-010-1356-3.
8.
CharlsonMEKarnikJWongMMcCullochCEHollenbergJP. Does experience matter? A comparison of the practice of attendings and residents. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(6):497–503. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0085.x.
9.
BarryWARosenthalGE. Is there a July phenomenon? The effect of July admission on intensive care mortality and length of stay in teaching hospitals. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(8):639–645. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12911646. Accessed April 4, 2016.
10.
BuchwaldDKomaroffALCookEFEpsteinAM. Indirect costs for medical education. Is there a July phenomenon?Arch Intern Med. 1989;149(4):765–768. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2495778. Accessed April 4, 2016.
11.
RichECGiffordGLuxenbergMDowdB. The relationship of house staff experience to the cost and quality of inpatient care. JAMA. 1990;263(7):953–957. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2299762. Accessed April 4, 2016.
12.
WeaverKJNealDHohDJMoccoJBarkerFGHohBL. The “July phenomenon” for neurosurgical mortality and complications in teaching hospitals: an analysis of more than 850,000 neurosurgical patients in the nationwide inpatient sample database, 1998 to 2008. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(3):562–571; discussion 571. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31825ea51b.
FordAABatemanBTSimpsonLLRatanRB. Nationwide data confirms absence of “July phenomenon” in obstetrics: it’s safe to deliver in July. J Perinatol. 2007;27(2):73–76. doi:10.1038/sj.jp.7211635.
15.
McDonaldRJCloftHJKallmesDF. Impact of admission month and hospital teaching status on outcomes in subarachnoid hemorrhage: evidence against the July effect. J Neurosurg. 2012;116(1):157–163. doi:10.3171/2011.8.JNS11324.
16.
ParkTHRedelmeierDALiSPongmoragotJSaposnikG; Investigators of the Registry of the Canadian Stroke network (RCSN) for the Stroke Outcomes Research (SORCan) Working Group. Academic year-end changeover and stroke outcomes. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24(2):500–506. doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.09.030.
17.
HackeWKasteMBluhmkiE; ECASS Investigators. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(13):1317–1329. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0804656.
18.
FonarowGCSmithEESaverJL. Improving door-to-needle times in acute ischemic stroke: the design and rationale for the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association’s target: Stroke initiative. Stroke. 2011;42(10):2983–2989. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.621342.
19.
FonarowGCSmithEESaverJL. Timeliness of tissue-type plasminogen activator therapy in acute ischemic stroke: patient characteristics, hospital factors, and outcomes associated with door-to-needle times within 60 minutes. Circulation. 2011;123(7):750–758. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.974675.
20.
FordALConnorLTTanDKWilliamsJALeeJMNassiefAM. Resident-based acute stroke protocol is expeditious and safe. Stroke. 2009;40(4):1512–1514. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.527770.
