Horizontal hop testing is a reliable measure included in test batteries after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). Hop test results are typically expressed as limb symmetry indexes (LSIs) comparing the involved limb with the uninvolved limb. Using the uninvolved limb as a comparative measure has been questioned due to concerns that performance may be reduced in this limb also and may not be a stable comparison across time, leading to a falsely inflated LSI. Here, we report changes in uninvolved limb hop scores over 5 timepoints after ACLR.
Hypothesis:
Uninvolved limb hop scores would be similar between preoperative rehabilitation and 2 years after ACLR.
Study Design:
Cohort study.
Level of Evidence:
Level III.
Methods:
Level I and II athletes were enrolled after isolated ACL injury. Participants completed a preoperative hop testing battery after impairment resolution, preoperative rehabilitation, and 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after ACLR. Linear mixed-effects models were performed separately for each hop and each limb to characterize change in scores over time. Pairwise comparisons for fixed effects of timepoint and estimated marginal means are reported.
Results:
A total of 182 athletes (25.0 ± 8.8 years, 44% female) were enrolled a mean of 54 days from ACL injury. For each hop, the uninvolved limb hop distance was statistically different from the impairment resolution timepoint only to various follow-up timepoints (P ≤ 0.009). If athletes underwent preoperative rehabilitation, uninvolved limb hop distance was stable throughout the duration of rehabilitation until 2 years, apart from timed hop from 6 months to 2 years (P = 0.04).
Conclusion:
The uninvolved limb is a stable comparison for calculating hop test LSIs as part of return-to-sport decisions.
Clinical Relevance:
These results increase confidence in using symmetry as an outcome and are important for clinicians lacking preinjury hop testing data.
AbramsGDHarrisJDGuptaAK, et al. Functional performance testing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Orthop J Sports Med. 2014;2(1):2325967113518305.
2.
AdamsDLogerstedtDSHunter-GiordanoAAxeMJSnyder-MacklerL.Current concepts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a criterion-based rehabilitation progression. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42(7):601-614.
3.
AizawaJHirohataKOhjiS, et al. Correlations between isokinetic knee torques and single-leg hop distances in three directions in patients after ACL reconstruction. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2021;13(1):38.
4.
BarfodKWFellerJAHartwigTDevittBMWebsterKE.Knee extensor strength and hop test performance following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee. 2019;26(1):149-154.
BrinleeAWDickensonSBHunter-GiordanoASnyder-MacklerL.ACL Reconstruction rehabilitation: clinical data, biologic healing, and criterion-based milestones to inform a return-to-sport guideline. Sports Health. 2022;14(5):770-779.
7.
BroskyJAJrNitzAJMaloneTRCabornDNRayensMK.Intrarater reliability of selected clinical outcome measures following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1999;29(1):39-48.
8.
CapinJJSnyder-MacklerLRisbergMAGrindemH.Keep calm and carry on testing: a substantive reanalysis and critique of € what is the evidence for and validity of return-to-sport testing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis’. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53(23):1444-1446.
9.
DanielDMStoneMLDobsonBEFithianDCRossmanDJKaufmanKR.Fate of the ACL-injured patient. A prospective outcome study. Am J Sports Med. 1993;22(5):632-644.
10.
DaviesWTMyerGDReadPJ.Is it time we better understood the tests we are using for return to sport decision making following ACL reconstruction? A critical review of the hop tests. Sports Med. 2020;50(3):485-495.
11.
EbertJREdwardsPPreezLDu, FurzerBJossB.Knee extensor strength, hop performance, patient-reported outcome and inter-test correlation in patients 9-12 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee. 2021;30:176-184.
12.
EitzenIMoksnesHSnyder-MacklerLRisbergMA.A progressive 5-week exercise therapy program leads to significant improvement in knee function early after anterior cruciate ligament injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40(11):705-721.
13.
EitzenIMoksnesHSnyder-MacklerLRisbergMA.A progressive 5-week exercise therapy program leads to significant improvement in knee function early after anterior cruciate ligament injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40(11):705-721.
14.
FaillaMJLogerstedtDSGrindemH, et al. Does extended preoperative rehabilitation influence outcomes 2 years after ACL reconstruction? A comparative effectiveness study between the MOON and Delaware-Oslo ACL cohorts. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(10):2608-2614.
15.
GiescheFNiedererDBanzerWVogtL.Evidence for the effects of prehabilitation before ACL-reconstruction on return to sport-related and self-reported knee function: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0240192.
16.
GokelerAWellingWBenjaminseALemminkKSeilRZaffagniniS.A critical analysis of limb symmetry indices of hop tests in athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a case control study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103(6):947-951.
17.
GrindemHEitzenIMoksnesHSnyder-MacklerLRisbergMA.A Pair-matched comparison of return to pivoting sports at 1 year in anterior cruciate ligament-injured patients after a nonoperative versus an operative treatment course. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(11):2509-2516.
18.
GrindemHGrananLPRisbergMAEngebretsenLSnyder-MacklerLEitzenI.How does a combined preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation programme influence the outcome of ACL reconstruction 2 years after surgery? A comparison between patients in the Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort and the Norwegian National Knee Ligament Registry. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(6):385-389.
19.
GrindemHSnyder-MacklerLMoksnesHEngebretsenLRisbergMA.Simple decision rules can reduce reinjury risk by 84% after ACL reconstruction: the Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(13):804-808.
20.
HartshorneMTTurnerJACameronKLPaduaDA.Strength of the uninvolved limb following return to activity after ACL injury: implications for symmetry as a marker of sufficient strength. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2024;19(6):657-669.
21.
HiemstraLAWebberSMacDonaldPBKriellaarsDJ.Contralateral limb strength deficits after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a hamstring tendon graft. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2007;22(5):543-550.
22.
JoreitzRLynchARabuckSLynchBDavinSIrrgangJ.Patient-specific and surgery-specific factors that affect return to sport after ACL reconstruction. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2016;11(2):264-278.
23.
KotsifakiAVan RossomSWhiteleyR, et al. Symmetry in triple hop distance hides asymmetries in knee function after ACL reconstruction in athletes at return to sports. Am J Sports Med. 2022;50(2):441-450.
24.
KotsifakiAWhiteleyRVan RossomS, et al. Single leg hop for distance symmetry masks lower limb biomechanics: time to discuss hop distance as decision criterion for return to sport after ACL reconstruction?Br J Sports Med. 2022;56(5):249-256.
25.
KyritsisPBahrRLandreauPMiladiRWitvrouwE.Likelihood of ACL graft rupture: not meeting six clinical discharge criteria before return to sport is associated with a four times greater risk of rupture. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(15):946-951.
26.
MunroAGHerringtonLC.Between-session reliability of four hop tests and the agility T-test. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(5):1470-1477.
27.
NoyesFRBarberSDMangineRE.Abnormal lower limb symmetry determined by functional hop tests after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19(5):513-518.
28.
PedersenMGrindemHJohnsonJL, et al. Clinical, functional, and physical activity outcomes 5 years following the treatment algorithm of the Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg. 2021;103(16):1473-1481.
29.
R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed October 12, 2024.
30.
ReidABirminghamT.Hop testing provides a reliable valid outcome measure during rehab after ACLR. Phys Ther. 2007;87(3):337-349.
31.
SturgillLPSnyder-MacklerLManalTJAxeMJ.Interrater reliability of a clinical scale to assess knee joint effusion. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39(12):845-849.
32.
van MelickNvan CingelREHBrooijmansF, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice update: practice guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation based on a systematic review and multidisciplinary consensus. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(24):1506-1515.
33.
WellsandtEFaillaMJSnyder-MacklerL.Limb symmetry indexes can overestimate knee function after anterior cruciate ligament injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017;47(5):334-338.
34.
WrenTALMueskeNMBrophyCH, et al. Hop distance symmetry does not indicate normal landing biomechanics in adolescent athletes with recent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018;48(8):622-629.
