In this article, we propose envisioning the tarot as an artful inquiry rooted in encounters with chaos and contingency. As a postfoundational approach to qualitative research, the tarot invites more questions than answers. The creation of tarot card art and card-readings together serve as a powerful heuristic of feral aesthetics. This article documents how creation and reading of a specific tarot deck unfolded at a conference and affected those who engaged in the process. Tarot-readings evoke posthuman affective processes that entangle the soul, thought, emotion, and action. The feral aesthetics of the tarot’s artful inquiry is marked by turbulence, uncertainty, and ambiguity. Tarot-as-inquiry articulated here blends archetypes, meanings, and assemblages of self and world into desirable fictions. As artful inquiry, tarot can thus shape perception of the present and future helping readers better navigate present desires and situate themselves in more desirable imagined futures.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the universe half-way: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
2.
BarrosS. R.HadeerR.GajasingheK. (2022). Confabulating research: Performing memory-work as inquiry. International Review of Qualitative Research, 15(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940844720978757
3.
BlenkinsopS.MorseM.JicklingB. (2022). Wild pedagogies: Opportunities and challenges for practice. In PaulsenM.jagodzinskij.HawkeS. M. (Eds.), Pedagogy in the Anthropocene (pp. 33–51). Palgrave-Macmillan.
ConradD. (2022). Centaurea cyanus revival. In ConradD.WiebeS. (Eds.), Educational fabulations. Teaching and learning for a world yet to come (pp. 323–332). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93827-7_25
6.
CrockerR. A. (2003). In the cards: A qualitative and quantitative investigation of divination practice and creativity within the feminist spirituality movement. [Doctoral dissertation, Saybrook University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
7.
DaspitT. (2003). Buffy goes to college, Adam “murders to dissect”: Education and knowledge in a postmodern world. In SouthJ. (Ed.), Buffy the vampire slayer and philosophy: Fear and trembling in Sunnydale (pp. 117–130). Open Court.
8.
DavidsonL. (2001). Foresight and insight: The art of the ancient tarot. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry, 29(3), 491–501. https://doi.org/10.1521/jaap.29.3.491.17297
9.
DerridaJ. (1982). Signature, event, context. In Margins of philosophy (A. Bass, Trans.) (pp. 307–330). University of Chicago Press. (Original work published in 1971).
10.
DollW. (1993). Foundations for a post-modern curriculum. Teachers College Press.
11.
DummettM. (1980). The game of tarot. Duckworth.
12.
FoucaultM. (1973). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. Vintage Books.
jagodzinskij. (2019). An avant-garde “without authority”: The posthuman cosmic artisan in the Anthropocene. In de AssisP.GiudiciP. (Eds.), Aberrant nuptials: Deleuze and artistic research (pp. 233–254). Leuven University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvmd83nt.19
15.
LlewellynD. (2015). Reading, feminism, and spirituality. In LlewellynD. (Ed.), Reading, feminism, and spirituality: Troubling the waves (pp. 9–29). Palgrave Macmillan.
16.
LorimerH. (2005). Cultural geography: The busyness of being ‘more-than-representational’. Progress in Human Geography, 29(1), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132505ph531pr
17.
MacCormackP. (2022). Ahuman occult pedagogy in practice. In BeierJ.jagodinskij. (Ed.), Ahuman pedagogy, multidisciplinary perspectives for education in the Anthropocene (pp. 17–33). Palgrave MacMillan.
MaloneK.TruongS. (2017). Sustainability, education, and anthropocentric precarity. In MaloneK.TruongS.GreyT. (Eds.), Reimagining sustainability in precarious times (pp. 3–16). Springer.
20.
MassumiB. (1995). The autonomy of affect. Cultural Critique, No. 31, The Politics of Systems and Environments, Part II (Autumn, 1995), (pp. 83–109). https://doi.org/10.2307/1354446
21.
MazzeiL. A.JacksonA. Y. (2012). Complicating voice in a refusal to “let participants speak for themselves.”. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(9), 745–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800412453017
McDermottM. (2023). Feral aesthetics in the age of the Anthropocene. [Conference session]. 2023 Annual meeting curriculum theory and classroom practice, OH, United States, 13–14 October, 2023. Dayton.
25.
Merleau-PontyM. (1996). Phenomenology of perception. Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.
26.
MortonT. (2010). The ecological thought. Harvard University Press.
27.
OsmondC. (2023). To feel the meaning:” A manual typewriter intervention toward authentic written language. [Conference session]. 2023 Annual Meeting Curriculum Theory and Classroom Practice, OH, United States. Dayton.
28.
PinarW. (2004). What is curriculum theory?Routledge.
29.
RamirezR.RavitzJ. (2011). Feral futures: Zen aesthetics. Futures, 43(4), 478–487.
30.
SnazaN. (2024). Tendings: Feminist esoterisms and the abolition of man. Duke University Press.
TishmanE. F. (2024). The Zero triumphant: Allegory, emptiness, and the early history of the tarot. In GobbetsP.KuhnL. (Eds.), The origin and significance of Zero: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 295–375). Brill.
35.
TsingH. (2020). Feral atlas and the more-than-human Anthropocene. Stanford University Press. https://www.feralatlas.org
36.
VanniniP. (2015). Non-representational research methodologies: An introduction. In VanniniP. (Ed.), Non-representational methodologies (pp. 1–18). Routledge.
37.
WynterS. (2003). Unsettling the coloniality of being/power/truth/freedom: Towards the human, after man, its overrepresentation – an argument. CR: The New Centennial Review, 3(3), 257–337. https://doi.org/10.1353/ncr.2004.0015
