Drawing on gatekeeping theory and platform governance, this study examined Arab journalists’ perspectives on news gatekeeping via social media, the challenges they faced when covering politically sensitive events, and the strategies they employed to address those challenges. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining in-depth interviews with twenty-four Arab multimedia journalists, social media specialists, and managers, along with an online survey of 171 Arab journalists from four Arab countries. The results revealed that the participants perceived algorithms as powerful intermediaries that considerably influenced their professional practices and news values on social media. They reported their experiences of shadow banning and content removal, particularly when reporting on Arab political issues such as the Palestinian issue. Journalists have reported that they must either adapt to the algorithmic dynamics or employ strategies to circumvent the algorithmic restrictions on Arab news coverage. This study underscores the need for greater transparency in algorithmic curation to ensure the fair representation of diverse voices in political news coverage.
AbokhodairNorahSkopYardenRüllerSarahAalKonstantinElmimouniHouda. 2024. “Opaque Algorithms, Transparent Biases: Automated Content Moderation during the Sheikh Jarrah Crisis.” First Monday29, no. 4: 1–25. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v29i4.13620.
2.
AtkinsonRowlandFlintJohn. 2001. “Accessing Hidden and Hard-to-Reach Populations: Snowball Research Strategies.” Social Research Update33, no. 1: 1–4.
3.
BailoFrancescoMeeseJamesHurcombeEdward. 2021. “The Institutional Impacts of Algorithmic Distribution: Facebook and the Australian News Media.” Social Media + Society7, no. 2: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211024963.
4.
BlassnigSinaMitovaElizaStrikovicEdinaUrmanAleksandrade VreeseClaesHannákAnikóEsserFrank. 2024. “User Perceptions of News Recommender Systems and Trust in Media Outlets: A Five-Country Study.” Journalism Studies25, no. 10: 1182–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2024.2364628.
5.
BucherTaina. 2018. “Programming the News: When Algorithms Come to Matter.” In If. . . Then: Algorithmic Power and Politics, ed. A. Chadwick. Oxford Studies in Digital Politics. Oxford Academic.
6.
PresuelRodrigo CetinaSierraJosé M. Martínez. 2019. “Algorithms and the News: Social Media Platforms as News Publishers and Distributors.” Revista de Comunicación18, no. 2: 261–85. https://doi.org/10.26441/RC18.2-2019-A13.
7.
CobbeJennifer. 2021. “Algorithmic Censorship by Social Platforms: Power and Resistance.” Philosophy & Technology34, no. 4: 739–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00429-0.
8.
CorniaAlessioSehlAnnikaLevyDavid ALNielsenRasmus Kleis. 2018. Private Sector News, Social Media Distribution, and Algorithm Change. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
9.
DuffyBrooke ErinMeisnerColten. 2022. “Platform Governance at the Margins: Social Media Creators’ Experiences with Algorithmic (In)visibility.” Media, Culture & Society45, no. 2: 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221111923.
10.
ElswahMona. 2024. Does AI Understand Arabic? Evaluating the Politics Behind the Algorithmic Arab Content Moderation. Carr Center for Human Rights Policy Research Publications, Harvard Kennedy School.
11.
FahmyShahira S.SalamaMohamedAlsabaMona Raafat. 2024. “Shattered Lives, Unbroken Stories: Journalists’ Perspectives from the Frontlines of the Israel–Gaza War.” Online Media & Global Communication3, no. 2: 151–80. https://doi.org/10.1515/omgc-2024-0012.
12.
GillespieTarleton. 2019. “Algorithmically Recognisable: Santorum’s Google Problem, and Google’s Santorum Problem.” In The Social Power of Algorithms, edited by BeerDavid. Routledge.
13.
GorwaRobertBinnsReubenKatzenbachChristian. 2020. “Algorithmic Content Moderation: Technical and Political Challenges in the Automation of Platform Governance.” Big Data & Society7, no. 1: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719897945.
HermannErik. 2022. “Artificial Intelligence and Mass Personalization of Communication Content—An Ethical and Literacy Perspective.” New Media & Society24, no. 5: 1258–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211022702.
16.
HuangShengchunYangTian. 2024. “Auditing Entertainment Traps on YouTube: How Do Recommendation Algorithms Pull Users Away from News?” Political Communication41, no. 6: 903–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2024.2343769.
17.
HuangYunyouLiuWenjingGaoWanlingLuXiangjiangLiangXiaoshuangYangZhengxinLiHongxiaoMaLiTangSuqin. 2023. “Algorithmic Fairness in Social Context.” BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards & Evaluations3, no. 3: 100137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100137.
JhaverShagunBruckmanAmyGilbertEric. 2019. “Does Transparency in Moderation Really Matter? User Behavior After Content Removal Explanations on Reddit.” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction3, no. CSCW: 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359252.
20.
KarlssonMichaelVan CouveringElizabethLindellJohan. 2022. “Publishing, Sharing, and Spreading Online News: A Case Study of Gatekeeping Logics in the Platform Era.” Nordicom Review43, no. 2: 190–213. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2022-0012.
21.
KasyMaximilian. 2024. “Algorithmic Bias and Racial Inequality: A Critical Review.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy40, no. 3: 530–546. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grae031.
22.
KlonickKate. 2017. “The New Governors: The People, Rules, and Processes Governing Online Speech.” Harvard Law Review131: 1598–1669.
23.
KordzadehNimaGhasemaghaeiMaryam. 2021. “Algorithmic Bias: Review, Synthesis, and Future Research Directions.” European Journal of Information Systems31, no. 3: 388–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2021.1927212.
24.
KuznetsovaElizavetaMakhortykhMykola. 2023. “Blame it on the Algorithm? Russian Government-Sponsored Media and Algorithmic Curation of Political Information on Facebook.” International Journal of Communication17: 971–92.
25.
LimChulminKimSeongcheol. 2024. “Examining Factors Influencing the User’s Loyalty on Algorithmic News Recommendation Service.” Humanities & Social Sciences Communications11, no. 1: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02516-x.
26.
MakadyHeidiDavieWilliam R.FischerKenneth A.2022. “Algorithms, Analytics, and Metrics: Is Audience Interaction Reshaping Algorithmic Gatekeeping in the Marketplace of Attention?” In The Emerald Handbook of Computer-Mediated Communication and Social Media, eds. H. L. Jeremy, K. Freberg, and R. Luttrell. Leeds, England: Emerald Publishing the Limited.
27.
MarchalNahemaHoesEmmaKlüserK. JonathanHamborgFelixAlizadehMeysamKubliMaelKatzenbachChristian. 2024. “How Negative Media Coverage Impacts Platform Governance: Evidence from Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube.” Political Communication42, no. 2: 215–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2024.2377992.
28.
MartinKirsten. 2019. “Ethical Implications and Accountability of Algorithms.” Journal of Business Ethics160, no. 4: 835–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3921-3.
29.
MerazSharonPapacharissiZizi. 2013. “Networked Gatekeeping and Networked Framing on #Egypt.” The International Journal of Press/Politics18, no. 2: 138–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161212474472.
30.
MohydinRavale. 2023. Algorithmic Censorship and Israel’s War on Gaza. TRT World Research Centre.
31.
NapoliPhilip M. 2015. “Social Media and the Public Interest: Governance of News Platforms in the Realm of Individual and Algorithmic Gatekeepers.” Telecommunications Policy39, no. 9: 751–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2014.12.003.
32.
NapoliPhilip. 2019. Social Media and the Public Interest: Media Regulation in the Disinformation Age. Columbia University Press.
33.
NeyaziTaberez AhmedNgSheryl Wei TingHobbsMitchellYueAudrey. 2023. “Understanding User Interactions and Perceptions of AI Risk in Singapore.” Big Data & Society10, no. 2: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231213823.
34.
RaderEmileeGrayRebecca. 2015. “Understanding User Beliefs About Algorithmic Curation in the Facebook News Feed.” Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’15), ACM. 18–23, Seoul Republic of Korea April.
35.
ReviglioUrbanoAgostiClaudio. 2020. “Thinking Outside the Black-Box: The Case for ‘Algorithmic Sovereignty’ in Social Media.” Social Media + Society6, no. 2(1): 12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120915613.
36.
RussellFrank M.2019. “The New Gatekeepers: An Institutional-Level View of Silicon Valley and the Disruption of Journalism.” Journalism Studies20, no. 5: 631–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1412806.
37.
SaurweinFlorianBrantnerCorneliaMöckLeonie. 2023. “Responsibility Networks in Media Discourses on Automation: A Comparative Analysis of Social Media Algorithms and Social Companions.” New Media & Society27, no. 3: 1752–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231203310.
38.
SavolainenLaura. 2022. “The Shadow Banning Controversy: Perceived Governance and Algorithmic Folklore.” Media, Culture & Society44, no. 6: 1091–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221077174.
39.
ScheffauerRebeccaGoyanesManuelde ZúñigaHomero Gil. 2024. “Social Media Algorithmic Versus Professional Journalists’ News Selection: Effects of Gate Keeping on Traditional and Social Media News Trust.” Journalism25, no. 4: 755–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849231179804.
40.
ShinDongheeZaidBouzianeBioccaFrankRasulAzmat. 2022a. “In Platforms We Trust? Unlocking the Black-Box of News Algorithms through Interpretable AI.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media66, no. 2: 235–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2022.2057984.
41.
ShinDongheeHameleersMichaelParkYong J.KimJeong N.TrielliDanielDiakopoulosNicholasHelbergerNataliLewisSeth C.WestlundOscarBaumannSabine. 2022b. “Countering Algorithmic Bias and Disinformation and Effectively Harnessing the Power of AI in Media.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly99, no. 4: 887–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990221129245.
42.
ShinDonghee. 2020. “User Perceptions of Algorithmic Decisions in the Personalised AI System: Perceptual Evaluation of Fairness, Accountability, Transparency, and Explainability.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media64, no. 4: 541–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2020.1843357.
SinghLisaPolyzouAgoritsaWangYanchenFarrJasonGresenzCarole Roan. 2020. “Social Media Data-Our Ethical Conundrum.” Bulletin of the IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Database Engineering 43, no. 4: 23–38.
45.
SrivastavaSwati. 2023. “Algorithmic Governance and the International Politics of Big Tech.” Perspectives on Politics21, no. 3: 989–1000. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592721003145.
46.
SuzorNicolas P.WestSarah MyersQuodlingAndrewYorkJillian. 2019. “What Do We Mean When We Talk about Transparency? Toward Meaningful Transparency in Commercial Content Moderation.” International Journal of Communication13: 18.
47.
TandocEdson C.VosTim P.2015. “The Journalist is Marketing the News: Social Media in the Gatekeeping Process.” Journalism Practice10, no. 8: 950–66. doi:10.1080/17512786.2015.1087811.
48.
TreréEmilianoBoniniTiziano. 2024. “Amplification, Evasion, Hijacking: Algorithms as Repertoire for Social Movements and the Struggle for Visibility.” Social Movement Studies23, no. 3: 303–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2022.2143345.
49.
van DalenArjen. 2023. Algorithmic Gatekeeping for Professional Communicators: Power, Trust, and Legitimacy. 1st ed. Routledge.
50.
van DijckJose. 2021. “Seeing the Forest for the Trees: Visualizing Platformization and its Governance.” New Media & Society23, no. 9: 2801–19.
51.
WallaceJulian. 2018. “Modelling Contemporary Gatekeeping: The Rise of Individuals, Algorithms and Platforms in Digital News Dissemination.” Digital Journalism6, no. 3: 274–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1343648.
52.
XuWeiaiFengMiao. 2014. “Talking to the Broadcasters on Twitter: Networked Gatekeeping in Twitter Conversations With Journalists.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media58, no. 3: 420–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2014.935853.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
