Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic unleashed a torrent of conspiracy theories across different social media platforms. Parallel to this conspiracy wave was a heightened sense of nationalism, which manifested through both in-group solidarity and perceived out-group threats. In this study, we examine how individuals’ use of government social media to gather political information correlated with nation-related conspiracy beliefs during the pandemic. Data were collected from 745 subjects in China and analyzed through path analyses, which allowed us to examine the direct association with political information consumption from government social media and the indirect association with nationalism on conspiracy beliefs. The results indicated that the use of government social media to gather political information was associated with greater beliefs in nation-variant COVID-19 conspiracies, both directly and through different mediations of nationalism. Our findings highlight the importance of examining government social media use and how nationalism can have differentiated mediation effects on beliefs in conspiracy theories.

Keywords

conspiracy beliefs pandemic nationalism government social media China political information

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allington

Duffy

Wessely

Dhavan

Rubin

. 2021. “Health-protective Behaviour, Social Media Usage and Conspiracy Belief During the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency.” Psychological Medicine 51(10):1763–1769. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329172000224X.

Anderson

1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.

Baden

Sharon

. 2021. “Blinded by the Lies? Toward an Integrated Definition of Conspiracy Theories.” Communication Theory 31(1):82–106. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaa023.

BBC. 2020, May 24. Coronavirus: China accuses US of spreading ‘conspiracies’. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-52790634.

Berinsky

A. J.

Margolis

M. F.

Sances

M. W.

. 2014. “Separating the Shirkers from the Workers? Making Sure Respondents Pay Attention on Self–Administered Surveys.” American Journal of Political Science 58(3):739–753. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12081.

Bieber

2020. Global Nationalism in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Nationalities Paper: 1–13.

Bieber

2022. Global Nationalism in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Nationalities Papers 50(1):13–25.

Brewer

M. B.

1999. “The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love or Outgroup Hate?” Journal of Social Issues 55:429–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00126.

Broomfield

E. V.

2003. “Perceptions of Danger: The China Threat Theory.” Journal of Contemporary China 12(35):265–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/1067056022000054605.

10.

Chatfield

Scholl

H. J.

Brajawidagda

. 2013. “Tsunami Early Warnings via Twitter in Government: Net-Savvy Citizens’ Co-production of Time-Critical Public Information Services.” Government Information Quarterly 30(4):377–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.021.

11.

Chen

2001. “Urban Chinese Perceptions of Threats from the United States and Japan.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 65(2):254–266. https://doi.org/0033-362X/2001/6502-0005.

12.

Chen

Zhang

Meng

Shen

. 2020a. “Conspiracy and Debunking Narratives About COVID-19 Origins on Chinese Social media: How it Started and who is to Blame.” Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review 1(8):1–30. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-50.

13.

Chen

Zhang

Meng

Shen

. 2022a.When National Identity Meets Conspiracies: The Contagion of National Identity Language in Public Engagement and Discourse About COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories.” Journal of Communication-Mediated Communication 28(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmac034.

14.

Chen

Min

Zhang

Wang

Evans

. 2020b. “Unpacking the Black box: How to Promote Citizen Engagement Through Government Social media During the COVID-19 Crisis.” Computers in Human Behavior 110:106380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106380.

15.

Chen

Valdovinos Kaye

D. B.

Zeng

. 2021. “#PositiveEnergy Douyin: Constructing “Playful Patriotism” in a Chinese Short-Video Application.” Chinese Journal of Communication 14(1):97–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2020.1761848.

16.

Chen

Zhang

Ramdass

. 2022b. “The Burden of Being Certain: National Identity Certainty Predicts Support for COVID-Related Restrictive Measures and Outgroup Conspiracy Beliefs.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 00:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12868.

17.

Cichocka

Marchlewska

De Zavala

A. G.

. 2016b. “Does Self-Love or Self-Hate Predict Conspiracy Beliefs? Narcissism, Self-Esteem, and the Endorsement of Conspiracy Theories.” Social Psychological and Personality Science 7(2):157–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615616170.

18.

Cichocka

Marchlewska

Zavala

Olechowski

. 2016a. ““They Will not Control us”: Ingroup Positivity and Belief in Intergroup Conspiracies.” British Journal of Psychology 107(3):556–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12158.

19.

Crocker

Luhtanen

Broadnax

Blaine

B. E.

. 1999. “Belief in US Government Conspiracies Against Blacks among Black and White College Students: Powerlessness or System Blame?” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25(8):941–953. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672992511003.

20.

Davidov

2009. “Measurement Equivalence of Nationalism and Constructive Patriotism in the ISSP: 34 Countries in a Comparative Perspective.” Political Analysis 17(1):64–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpn014.

21.

De Coninck

Frissen

Matthijs

, et al. 2021. “Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories and Misinformation About COVID-19: Comparative Perspectives on the Role of Anxiety, Depression and Exposure to and Trust in Information Sources.” Frontiers in Psychology 12:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.646394.

22.

Deibert

2015. “Authoritarianism Goes Global: Cyberspace Under Siege.” Journal of Democracy 26(3):64–78. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2015.0051.

23.

Diamond

2015. “Liberation Technology 1.” In In Search of Democracy, ed. Diamond

, 132–146. Oxfordshire: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

24.

Douglas

K. M.

Sutton

R. M.

Cichocka

. 2017. “The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 26(6):538–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417718261.

25.

Douglas

K. M.

Uscinski

J. E.

Sutton

R. M.

Cichocka

Nefes

Ang

C. S.

Deravi

. 2019. “ Understanding conspiracy theories .” Political Psychology 40:3–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12568.

26.

Dredze

Broniatowski

D. A.

Hilyard

K. M.

. 2016. “Zika Vaccine Misconceptions: A Social media Analysis.” Vaccine 34(30):3441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.05.008.

27.

Druckman

1994. “Nationalism, Patriotism, and Group Loyalty: A Social Psychological Perspective.” Mershon International Studies Review 38(1):43. https://doi.org/10.2307/222610.

28.

Duggan

Smith

. 2016. The Political Environment on Social Media. Pew Research Centre.

29.

Enikolopov

Makarin

Petrova

. 2020. “Social media and Protest Participation: Evidence from Russia.” Econometrica 88(4):1479–1514. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA14281.

30.

Esses

V. M.

Haddock

Zanna

M. P.

. 1993. “Values, Stereotypes, and Emotions as Determinants of Intergroup Attitudes.” In Affect, Cognition and Stereotyping, ed. Mackie

D. M.

Hamilton

D. L.

, 137–166. Massachusetts: Academic Press.

31.

Fearon

J. D.

Laitin

D. D.

. 2003. “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War.” American Political Science Review 97(1):75–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000534.

32.

Freiling

Krause

N. M.

Scheufele

D. A.

Brossard

. 2021. “Believing and Sharing Misinformation, Fact-checks, and Accurate Information on Social Media: The Role of Anxiety During COVID-19.” New Media & Society 25(1):141–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211011451.

33.

Frischlich

Humprecht

. 2021. Trust, democratic resilience, and the infodemic. Accessed at: https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/202660/1/Frischlich-Humprecht-Trust-Democratic-Resilience-and-the-Infodemic.pdf.

34.

Gellner

1983. Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

35.

Gibson

J. L.

2006. “Do Strong Group Identities Fuel Intolerance? Evidence from the South African Case.” Political Psychology 27(5):665–705. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00528.x.

36.

Goode

J. P.

Stroup

D. R.

Gaufman

. 2020. Everyday nationalism in unsettled times: In search of normality during pandemic. Nationalities Papers, First View: 1–25.

37.

Grimmelikhuijsen

S. G.

Meijer

A. J.

. 2015. “Does Twitter Increase Perceived Police Legitimacy?.” Public Administration Review 75(4):598–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12378.

38.

Haenschen

2020. “Self-reported Versus Digitally Recorded: Measuring Political Activity on Facebook.” Social Science Computer Review 38(5):567–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318813586.

39.

Hirwani, P. 2020, October 21. India's media is losing its freedom and crackdowns on the press could get even worse. Business Insider. Retrieved October 20, 2022, from https://www.businessinsider.com/indian-media-press-losing-freedom-under-authoritarian-government-2020-10.

40.

Bentler

P. M.

. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6(1):1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.

41.

Jardina

2020. In-Group Love and Out-Group Hate: White Racial Attitudes in Contemporary U.S. Elections. Political Behavior Mar:1–25.

42.

Jia

Luo

. 2021. “I Wear a Mask for my Country: Conspiracy Theories, Nationalism, and Intention to Adopt Covid-19 Prevention Behaviors at the Later Stage of Pandemic Control in China.” Health Communication, online first: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1958982.

43.

Jiang

Tang

. 2022. “Effects of Local Government Social Media Use on Citizen Compliance During a Crisis: Evidence from the COVID–19 Crisis in China.” Public Administration, online first: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12845.

44.

Jolley

Meleady

Douglas

K. M.

. 2020. “Exposure to Intergroup Conspiracy Theories Promotes Prejudice Which Spreads Across Groups.” British Journal of Psychology 111(1):17–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12385.

45.

Keeley

B. L.

1999. “Of Conspiracy Theories.” The Journal of Philosophy 96(3):109–126. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1084585.

46.

Kiik

2020. “Inter-national Conspiracy? Speculating on the Myitsone Dam Controversy in China, Burma, Kachin, and a Displaced Village.” Geopolitics, online first: 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2020.1808886.

47.

Kim

Chen

Liang

. 2021. “Engineering Care in Pandemic Technogovernance: The Politics of Care in China and South Korea’s COVID-19 Tracking Apps.” New Media & Society, online first: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211020752.

48.

King

Pan

Roberts

M. E.

. 2013. “How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression.” American Political Science Review 107(2):326–343. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055413000014.

49.

King

Pan

Roberts

M. E.

. 2017. “How the Chinese Government Fabricates Social Media Posts for Strategic Distraction, Not Engaged Argument.” American Political Science Review 111(3):484–501. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000144.

50.

Kosterman

Feshbach

. 1989. “Toward a Measure of Patriotic and Nationalistic Attitudes.” Political Psychology 10(2):257–274. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791647.

51.

Levin

Sidanius

. 1999. “Social Dominance and Social Identity in the United States and Israel: Ingroup Favoritism or Outgroup Derogation?” Political Psychology 20(1):99–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00138.

52.

Pan

. 2021. “Capturing Clicks: How the Chinese Government Uses Clickbait to Compete for Visibility.” Political Communication 38(1–2):23–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1765914.

53.

Pan

. 2022. “The Pervasive Presence of Chinese Government Content on Douyin Trending Videos.” Computational Communication Research 4(1):68–98. https://doi.org/10.5117/CCr2022.2.002.LU .

54.

Luo

Jia

. 2021. “When Scientific Literacy Meets Nationalism: Exploring the Underlying Factors in the Chinese Public’s Belief in COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories.” Chinese Journal of Communication 15(2):227–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2021.1954963.

55.

Mancosu

Vassallo

Vezzoni

. 2017. “Believing in Conspiracy Theories: Evidence from an Exploratory Analysis of Italian Survey Data.” South European Society and Politics 22(3):327–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2017.1359894.

56.

Marmura

S. M.

2014. “Likely and Unlikely Stories: Conspiracy Theories in an Age of Propaganda.” International Journal of Communication 8:2377–2395. https://doi.org/1932–8036/20140005.

57.

Marx

A. W.

2005. Faith in Nation: Exclusionary Origins of Nationalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

58.

Mölder

Sazonov

. 2019. “The Impact of Russian Anti-Western Conspiracy Theories on the status-Related Conflict in Ukraine: The Case of Flight MH17.” TalTech Journal of European Studies 9(3):96–115. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2019-0024.

59.

2020. The Prevalence and Antecedents of Nationalism Conspiracy Theories During Covid-19 in China. In 2020 4th International Seminar on Education, Management and Social Sciences (ISEMSS 2020).

60.

Nyhan

Zeitzoff

. 2018. “Conspiracy and Misperception Belief in the Middle East and North Africa.” The Journal of Politics 80(4):1400–1404. https://doi.org/10.1086/698663.

61.

Oleksy

Wnuk

Maison

Łyś

. 2021. “Content Matters. Different Predictors and Social Consequences of General and Government-related Conspiracy Theories on COVID-19.” Personality and Individual DIfferences, online first: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110289.

62.

Pan

Shao

. 2022. “How Government-controlled Media Shifts Policy Attitudes through Framing.” Political Science Research and Methods 10(2):317–332.

63.

Pan

. 2018. “China’s Ideological Spectrum.” The Journal of Politics 80(1):254–273. https://doi.org/0022-3816/2018/8001-0018.

64.

Parry

D. A.

Davidson

B. I.

Sewall

C. J.

Fisher

J. T.

Mieczkowski

Quintana

D. S.

. 2021. “A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Discrepancies Between Logged and Self-Reported Digital Media Use.” Nature Human Behaviour 5(11):1535–1547. https://doi.org/s41562-021-01117-5.

65.

Perry

E. J.

2017. Cultural governance in contemporary China:“Re-orienting” party propaganda. To govern China: Evolving practices of power, 29–55.

66.

Pummerer

Böhm

Lilleholt

Winter

Zettler

Sassenberg

. 2022. “Conspiracy Theories and Their Societal Effects During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Social Psychological and Personality Science 13(1):49–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211000217.

67.

Schlæger

Jiang

. 2014. “Official Microblogging and Social Management by Local Governments in China.” China Information 28(2):189–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203X14533901.

68.

Shin

2020. “How Do Partisans Consume News on Social Media? A Comparison of Self-Reports With Digital Trace Measures Among Twitter Users.” Social Media + Society 6(4):1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120981039.

69.

Ståhl

Van Prooijen

J. W.

. 2018. “Epistemic Rationality: Skepticism Toward Unfounded Beliefs Requires Sufficient Cognitive Ability and Motivation to be Rational.” Personality and Individual Differences 122:155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.026.

70.

Stephan

W. S.

Stephan

C. W.

. 2013. “An Integrated Threat Theory of Prejudice.” In Reducing Prejudice and Discrimination, 33–56. London: Psychology Press.

71.

Stephan

W. G.

Ybarra

Martnez

C. M.

Schwarzwald

Tur-Kaspa

. 1998. “Prejudice Toward Immigrants to Spain and Israel: An Integrated Threat Theory Analysis.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 29(4):559–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022198294004.

72.

Stephan

W. G.

Ybarra

Rios

. 2016. Intergroup threat theory. Retrieved at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Oscar-Ybarra/publication/285515618_Intergroup_threat_theory/links/5a66a4a9aca2720ba6af5779/Intergroup-threat-theory.pdf.

73.

Sternisko

Cichocka

Cislak

Van Bavel

J. J.

. 2021. “National Narcissism Predicts the Belief in and the Dissemination of Conspiracy Theories During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence From 56 Countries.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 49(1):48–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211054947.

74.

Stockmann

Esarey

Zhang

. 2018. “Who is Afraid of the Chinese State? Evidence Calling into Question Political Fear as an Explanation for Overreporting of Political Trust.” Political Psychology 39(5):1105–1121. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12471.

75.

Sutton

R. M.

Douglas

K. M.

. 2020. “Conspiracy Theories and the Conspiracy Mindset: Implications for Political Ideology.” Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 34:118–122. https://doi.org/j.cobeha.2020.02.015.

76.

Tandoc

E. C.

Jr Lee

J. C. B.

. 2020. “When Viruses and Misinformation Spread: How Young Singaporeans Navigated Uncertainty in the Early Stages of the COVID-19 Outbreak.” New Media & Society 24(3):778–796. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820968212.

77.

Theocharis, Y., A. Cardenal, S. Jin, T. Aalberg, D. N. Hopmann, J. Strömbäck, L. Castro, F. Esser, P. Van Aelst, C. de Vreese, N. Corbu, K. Koc-Michalska, J. Matthes, C. Schemer, T. Sheafer, S. Splendore, J. Stanyer, A. Stępińska, and V. Štětka 2021. “Does the Platform Matter? Social Media and COVID-19 Conspiracy Theory Beliefs in 17 Countries.” New Media and Society, online first: 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211045666.

78.

Uscinski

J. E.

2017. “The Study of Conspiracy Theories.” Argumenta 3(2):1–13. https://doi.org/10.23811/53.arg2017.usc.

79.

van Prooijen

J. W.

Song

. 2021. “The Cultural Dimension of Intergroup Conspiracy Theories.” British Journal of Psychology 112(2):455–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12471.

80.

van Prooijen

J. W.

Van Lange

P. A.

. 2014. Power, Politics, and Paranoia: Why People are Suspicious of their Leaders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

81.

Wang

2021. “From Crisis to Nationalism? The Conditioned Effects of the COVID-19 Crisis on Neo-Nationalism in Europe.” Chinese Political Science Review 6(1):20–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-020-00169-8.

82.

Wei

Yao

Zhang

. 2021. “Authoritarian Responsiveness and Political Attitudes During COVID-19: Evidence from Weibo and a Survey Experiment.” Chinese Sociological Review, online first: 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/21620555.2021.1967737.

83.

Weiss

J. C.

2019. “How Hawkish is the Chinese Public? Another Look at “Rising Nationalism” and Chinese Foreign Policy.” Journal of Contemporary China 28(119):679–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2019.1580427.

84.

Woolley

S. C.

Howard

P. N.

. 2016. “Political Communication, Computational Propaganda, and Autonomous Agents: Introduction.” International Journal of Communication 10(2016):4882–4890. https://doi.org/1932–8036/20160005.

85.

Xiao

Borah

. 2021. “The Dangers of Blind Trust: Examining the Interplay among Social media News use, Misinformation Identification, and News Trust on Conspiracy Beliefs.” Public Understanding of Science 30(8):977–992. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662521998025.

86.

Zhao

2020. “How China’s State Actors Create a “Us vs US” World During Covid-19 Pandemic on Social media.” Media and Communication 8(2):452–457. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.3187.

87.

Zheng

2020. Face masks and coronavirus: how culture affects your decision to wear one. South China Morning Post.

88.

Zou

2019. “When Nationalism Meets hip-hop: Aestheticized Politics of Ideotainment in China.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 16(3):178–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2019.1637008.

89.

Zou

2021. “Mistranslation as Disinformation: COVID-19, Global Imaginaries, and Self-Serving Cosmopolitanism.” Cultural Studies 35(2–3):523–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2021.1898037.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.38 MB

Pandemic Nationalism: Use of Government Social Media for Political Information and Belief in COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories in China

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material