The political agenda-setting literature has extensively demonstrated that issues receiving more media attention rank higher on the political agenda as well. Scholars now try to get grip on the mechanisms underlying these findings. This paper focuses on the media’s informational function as a driver of political agenda-setting processes. It studies the extent to which politicians, when reacting to media information, really learn about the information from the media—as opposed to instances where the media function as an amplifier rather than as the true source of policy-relevant information. The matter is investigated by means of a survey with Members of Parliament (MPs) in Belgium, Canada, and Israel (N = 376). We confronted the MPs with news stories that had recently been in the media, asking them whether they undertook political action on the news story and whether they knew about the news story before it appeared in the media. We show that politicians mostly knew about the information before it appeared in the media—but that there is variation between politicians and types of action in this respect.
ArceneauxKevinJohnsonMartinLindstädtRenéVander WielenRyan J.2016. “The Influence of News Media on Political Elites: Investigating Strategic Responsiveness in Congress.” American Journal of Political Science60 (1): 5–29.
2.
BaumgartnerFrank R.JonesBryan D.1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
BaumgartnerFrank R.JonesBryan D.2015. The Politics of Information: Problem Definition and the Course of Public Policy in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
BonafontLaura ChaquésBaumgartnerFrank R.2013. “Newspaper Attention and Policy Activities in Spain.” Journal of Public Policy33 (1): 65–88.
5.
BrownRobin. 2010. “The Media and the Policy Process.” In Public Policy and Mass Media: The Interplay of Mass Communication and Political Decision Making, ed. Koch-BaumgartenSigridVoltmerKatrin, 127–42. New York: Routledge.
CohenJonathanTsfatiYarivSheaferTamir. 2008. “The Influence of Presumed Media Influence in Politics: Do Politicians’ Perceptions of Media Power Matter?” Public Opinion Quarterly72 (2): 331–44.
8.
DavisAeron. 2009. “Journalist–Source Relations, Mediated Reflexivity and the Politics of Politics.” Journalism Studies10 (2): 204–19.
9.
DelshadAshlie B.2012. “Revisiting ‘Who Influences Whom?’ Agenda Setting on Biofuels.” Congress & the Presidency39 (2): 177–98.
10.
EdwardsGeorge C.Dan WoodB.1999. “Who Influences Whom? The President, Congress, and the Media.” The American Political Science Review93 (2): 327–44.
11.
EisslerRebeccaRussellAnneliseJonesBryan D.2014. “New Avenues for the Study of Agenda Setting.” Policy Studies Journal42: S71–86.
12.
Elmelund-PræstekærChristianWienCharlotte. 2008. “What’s the Fuss about? The Interplay of Media Hypes and Politics.” The International Journal of Press/Politics13 (3): 247–66.
13.
GaltungJohanRugeMari Holmboe. 1965. “The Structure of Foreign News.” Journal of Peace Research2 (1): 64–91.
14.
Green-PedersenChristofferStubagerRune. 2010. “The Political Conditionality of Mass Media Influence: When Do Parties Follow Mass Media Attention?” British Journal of Political Science40 (3): 663–77.
15.
HelferLuzia. 2016. “Media Effects on Politicians: An Individual-Level Political Agenda-Setting Experiment.” The International Journal of Press/Politics21 (2): 233–52.
16.
HerbstSusan. 1998. Reading Public Opinion: How Political Actors View the Democratic Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
KingdonJohn W.1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.
18.
KuneliusRistoReunanenEsa. 2012. “Media in Political Power: A Parsonian View on the Differentiated Mediatization of Finnish Decision Makers.” The International Journal of Press/Politics17 (1): 56–75.
19.
LiuXinshengLindquistEricVedlitzArnold. 2011. “Explaining Media and Congressional Attention to Global Climate Change, 1969-2005: An Empirical Test of Agenda-Setting Theory.” Political Research Quarterly64 (2): 405–19.
20.
MelenhorstLotte. 2015. “The Media’s Role in Lawmaking: A Case Study Analysis.” The International Journal of Press/Politics20 (3): 297–316.
21.
ProtessDavid L.CookFay LomaxCurtinThomas R.GordonMargaret T.LeffDonna R.McCombsMaxwell E.MillerPeter. 1987. “The Impact of Investigative Reporting on Public Opinion and Policymaking Targeting Toxic Waste.” Public Opinion Quarterly51 (2): 166–85.
22.
SellersPatrick. 2009. Cycles of Spin: Strategic Communication in the U.S. Congress. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
SemetkoH. A.ValkenburgP. M.2000. “Framing European Politics: A Content Analysis of Press and Television News.” Journal of Communication50 (2): 93–109.
24.
SevenansJulieWalgraveStefaanVosDebby. 2015. “Political Elites’ Media Responsiveness and Their Individual Political Goals: A Study of National Politicians in Belgium.” Research & Politics2 (3). http://rap.sagepub.com/content/2/3/2053168015593307 (accessed April 4, 2016).
25.
SorokaStuart N.2002. “Issue Attributes and Agenda-Setting by Media, the Public, and Policymakers in Canada.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research14 (3): 264–85.
26.
SorokaStuart N.PennerErinBlidookKelly. 2009. “Constituency Influence in Parliament.” Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique42 (3): 563–91.
27.
ThesenGunnar. 2013. “When Good News Is Scarce and Bad News Is Good: Government Responsibilities and Opposition Possibilities in Political Agenda-Setting.” European Journal of Political Research52 (3): 364–89.
28.
Van AelstPeter. 2014. “Media, Political Agendas and Public Policy.” In Political Communication: Handbook of Communication Science, ed. ReinemannCarsten, 231–48. Berlin: De Gruyter-Mouton.
van der PasDaphne. 2014. “Making Hay While the Sun Shines: Do Parties Only Respond to Media Attention When the Framing Is Right?” The International Journal of Press/Politics19 (1): 42–65.
31.
van SantenRosaHelferLuziavan AelstPeter. 2013. “When Politics Becomes News: An Analysis of Parliamentary Questions and Press Coverage in Three West European Countries.” Acta Politica50 (1): 45–63.
32.
VesaJuhoBlombergHelenaKrollChristian. 2015. “Minimal and Massive! Politicians’ Views on the Media’s Political Agenda-Setting Power Revisited.” The International Journal of Press/Politics20 (3): 279–96.
33.
VliegenthartRensWalgraveStefaan. 2011. “When the Media Matter for Politics: Partisan Moderators of the Mass Media’s Agenda-Setting Influence on Parliament in Belgium.” Party Politics17 (3): 321–42.
34.
VliegenthartRensWalgraveStefaanBaumgartnerFrank R.BevanShaunBreunigChristianBrouardSylvainBonafontLaura ChaquésGrossmanEmilianoJenningsWillMortensenPeter B.PalauAnna M.SciariniPascalTreschAnke. 2016. “Do the Media Set the Parliamentary Agenda? A Comparative Study in Seven Countries.” European Journal of Political Research55 (2): 283–301.
35.
VoltmerKatrinKoch-BaumgartenSigrid. 2010. “Introduction: Mass Media and Public Policy—Is There a Link?” In Public Policy and Mass Media: The Interplay of Mass Communication and Political Decision Making, ed. Koch-BaumgartenSigridVoltmerKatrin, 1–14. New York: Routledge.
36.
WalgraveStefaanDejaeghereYves. 2016. “Surviving Information Overload: How Elite Politicians Select Information.” Governance. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/gove.12209.
37.
WalgraveStefaanVan AelstPeter. 2006. “The Contingency of the Mass Media’s Political Agenda Setting Power: Toward a Preliminary Theory.” Journal of Communication56 (1): 88–109.
38.
WolfsfeldGadi. 2013. The Politics-Media-Politics Principle: Towards a More Comprehensive Approach to Political Communication. SSRN Scholarly Paper. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.
39.
WolfsfeldGadiSheaferTamir. 2006. “Competing Actors and the Construction of Political News: The Contest over Waves in Israel.” Political Communication23 (3): 333–54.
40.
WoodB. DanPeakeJeffrey S.1998. “The Dynamics of Foreign Policy Agenda Setting.” The American Political Science Review92 (1): 173–84.
41.
YanovitzkyItzhak. 2002. “Effects of News Coverage on Policy Attention and Actions a Closer Look into the Media-Policy Connection.” Communication Research29 (4): 422–51.
