Though news representations of protest have been studied extensively, little is known about how media audiences critique such representations. Focusing on TikTok as a space for media criticism, this article examines how users employ the app to respond to representations of protest in mainstream news media. Content collected in the spring of 2021 illuminated two very distinct foci of discussion about news representations of protest: the Black Lives Matter movement and the Capitol riot. Our qualitative content analysis of TikTok videos and their related comments demonstrates how users employed TikTok’s creative affordances to dissect specific news representations, critique the media apparatus, and expand news narratives. These findings shed light on the complex role of TikTok as a platform for media criticism—one that can be used for both democratic and non-democratic ends.
BenklerY.RobertsH.FarisR.Solow-NiedermanA.EtlingB.. 2013. Social mobilization and the networked public sphere: Mapping the SOPA-PIPA debate. Berkman Center Research Publication No. 2013–16.https://ssrn.com/abstract = 2295953.
3.
BoffoneT.2022. TikTok Cultures in the United States. New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
BrownD. K.WilnerT.MasulloG. M.. 2021. “‘It’s Just Not the Whole Story’: Black Perspectives of Protest Portrayals.” Howard Journal of Communications, 1–14. 10.1080/10646175.2021.2012852.
5.
CareyJ. W.1974. “Journalism and Criticism: The Case of an Undeveloped Profession.” The Review of Politics36(2):227–49. 10.1017/S0034670500022579
CotterK.ThorsonK.. 2022. “Judging Value in a Time of Information Cacophony: Young Adults, Social media, and the Messiness of Do-It-Yourself Expertise.” The International Journal of Press/Politics27(3):629–47. 10.1177/19401612221082074
8.
DeLucaK. M.LawsonS.SunY.. 2012. “Occupy Wall Street on the Public Screens of Social media: The Many Framings of the Birth of a Protest Movement.” Communication, Culture & Critique5(4):483–509. 10.1111/j.1753-9137.2012.01141.x
9.
EdgerlyL.ToftA.VedenM. L.. 2011. “Social Movements, Political Goals, and the May 1 Marches: Communicating Protest in Polysemous Media Environments.” The International Journal of Press/Politics16(3):314–34. 10.1177/1940161211398480
10.
EvansS. K.PearceK. E.VitakJ.TreemJ. W.. 2017. “Explicating Affordances: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Affordances in Communication Research.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication22(1):35–52. 10.1111/jcc4.12180
11.
FigenschouT. U.IhlebækK. A.. 2019. “Challenging Journalistic Authority: Media Criticism in Far-Right Alternative Media.” Journalism Studies20(9):1221–37. 10.1080/1461670X.2018.1500868
12.
GamsonW. A.WolfsfeldG.. 1993. “Movements and Media as Interacting Systems.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science528:114–25.10.1177/0002716293528001009
13.
GibbsM.MeeseJ.ArnoldM.NansenB.CarterM.. 2015. “#Funeral and Instagram: Death, Social Media, and Platform Vernacular.” Information, Communication & Society18(3):255–68. 10.1080/1369118X.2014.987152
14.
GitlinT.1980. The Whole World is Watching: Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of the New Left. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
15.
HackA.2020, September 27. “Witness Me: How TikTok Users Broke With the Sociopathic American Gaze in the Wake of George Floyd’s Murder.” Flow Journal27(1), Retrieved from https://www.flowjournal.org/2020/09/witness-me.
16.
HarlowS.JohnsonT. J.. 2011. “Overthrowing the Protest Paradigm? How The New York Times, Global Voices and Twitter Covered the Egyptian Revolution.” International Journal of Communication5:1359–74.
17.
HauteaS.ParksP.TakahashiB.ZengJ.. 2021. “Showing They Care (or Don’t): Affective Publics and Ambivalent Climate Activism on TikTok.” Social Media & Society7(2):205630512110123. 10.1177/20563051211012344.
JacksonS. J.BaileyM.Foucault WellesB.. 2020. #HashtagActivism: Networks of Race and Gender Justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
JenkinsH.ShresthovaS.Gamber-ThompsonL.Kligler-VilenchikN.ZimmermanA. M.SoepE.. 2016. By Any Media Necessary: The New Youth Activism. New York, NY: NYU Press.
21.
KayeD. B. V.ChenX.ZengJ.. 2021. “The Co-Evolution of Two Chinese Mobile Short Video Apps: Parallel Platformization of Douyin and TikTok.” Mobile Media and Communication9(2):229–53. 10.1177/2050157920952120
22.
KilgoD. K.HarlowS.. 2019. “Protests, Media Coverage, and a Hierarchy of Social Struggle.” The International Journal of Press/Politics24(4):508–30. 10.1177/1940161219853517
23.
KilgoD. K.HarlowS.García-PerdomoV.SalaverríaR.. 2018. “From #Ferguson to #Ayotzinapa: Analyzing Differences in Domestic and Foreign Protest News Shared on Social Media.” Mass Communication and Society21(5):606–30. 10.1080/15205436.2018.1469773
24.
KristensenN. N.FromU.. 2015. “From Ivory Tower to Cross-Media Personas: The Heterogeneous Cultural Critic in the Media.” Journalism Practice9(6):853–71. 10.1080/17512786.2015.1051370
25.
LewisR.2020. “‘This is What the News Won’t Show You’: YouTube Creators and the Reactionary Politics of Micro-Celebrity.” Television & New Media21(2):201–17. 10.1177/1527476419879919
26.
LiteratI.Kligler-VilenchikN.. 2019. “Youth Collective Political Expression on Social Media: The Role of Affordances and Memetic Dimensions for Voicing Political Views.” New Media and Society21(9):1988–2009. 10.1177/1461444819837571
27.
LiteratI.Kligler-VilenchikN.. 2021. “How Popular Culture Prompts Youth Collective Political Expression and Cross-Cutting Political Talk on Social media: A Cross-Platform Analysis.” Social Media + Society7(2):205630512110088. 10.1177/20563051211008821
28.
McCluskeyM.July 22, 2020. These TikTok creators say they’re still being suppressed for posting Black Lives Matter content. TIME. Retrieved from https://time.com/5863350/tiktok-black-creators/.
29.
McLeodD. M.HertogJ. K.. 1999. “Social Control, Social Change and the Mass Media’s Role in the Regulation of Protest Groups.” In Mass media, Social Control, and Social Change, ed. DemersD.ViswanathK., 305–30. Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
30.
Medina SerranoJ. C.PapakyriakopoulosO.HegelichS.. 2020, July. “Dancing to the Partisan Beat: A First Analysis of Political Communication on TikTok.” 12th ACM Conference on Web Science, 257–66. 10.1145/3394231.3397916.
31.
ReichertzJ.2019. “Abduction: The Logic of Discovery of Grounded Theory – an Updated Review.” In The SAGE Handbook of Current Developments in Grounded Theory, ed. BryantA.CharmazK., 259–81. London, UK: Sage.
32.
RojasH.2010. ““Corrective” Actions in the Public Sphere: How Perceptions of Media and Media Effects Shape Political Behaviors.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research22(3):343–63. 10.1093/ijpor/edq018
33.
SchellewaldA.2021. “Communicative Forms on TikTok: Perspectives From Digital Ethnography.” International Journal of Communication15:1437–57.
34.
ShifmanL.2013. “Memes in a Digital World: Reconciling With a Conceptual Troublemaker.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication18(3):362–77. 10.1111/jcc4.12013
35.
Vázquez-HerreroJ.Negreira-ReyM. C.López-GarcíaX.. 2020. “Let’s Dance the News! How the News Media are Adapting to the Logic of TikTok.” Journalism, 146488492096909. 10.1177/1464884920969092.
36.
VijayD.GekkerA.. 2021. “Playing Politics: How Sabarimala Played Out on TikTok.” American Behavioral Scientist65(5):712–34. 10.1177/0002764221989769
37.
VosT. P.CraftS.AshleyS.. 2012. “New Media, Old Criticism: Bloggers’ Press Criticism and the Journalistic Field.” Journalism13(7):850–68. 10.1177/1464884911421705
ZengJ.AbidinC.SchäferM. S.. 2021. “Research Perspectives on TikTok and its Legacy Apps: Introduction.” International Journal of Communication15:3161–72.
41.
ZengJ.KayeD. B. V.. 2022. “From Content Moderation to Visibility Moderation: A Case Study of Platform Governance on TikTok.” Policy & Internet14(1):79–95. 10.1002/poi3.287
