Media scholars have long recognized the potential for falsely balanced reporting to distort public opinion, but existing empirical evidence is inconclusive. In this study, we examine the effect of falsely balanced reporting and explicit journalistic intervention on perceptions of voter fraud in U.S. elections through original internet survey experiments conducted in the United States shortly before and after the 2020 U.S. presidential election held on November 3, 2020. The results show that exposure to falsely balanced reporting largely has a null effect on perceptions of voter fraud, though we also find evidence of partisan-based heterogeneity in its effect. The results of the study also show that explicit journalistic intervention equally decreases belief in voter fraud among both Democrats and Republicans before the election, but among Republicans the corrective effect of intervention disappears in the post-election period, suggesting that there are sharp contextual limits on the effect of explicit journalistic intervention.
AllcottHuntGentzkowMatthew. 2017. “Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election.” Journal of Economic Perspectives31 (2): 211–236.
2.
BartelsLarry. 2002. “Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions.” Political Behavior24 (2): 117–50.
3.
BenklerYochaiFarisRobertRobertsHal. 2018. Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
4.
BerinskyAdam. 2015. “Rumors and Health Care Reform: Experiments in Political Misinformation.” British Journal of Political Science47 (2): 241–62.
5.
BerlinskiNicolasDoyleMargaretGuessAndrew M.LevyGabrielleLyonsBenjaminMontgomeryJacob M.NyhanBrendanReiflerJason. 2021. “The Effects of Unsubstantiated Claims of Voter Fraud on Confidence in Elections.” Journal of Experimental Political Science, 1–16.
6.
BoczkowskiPablo J.PapacharissiZizi eds. 2018. Trump and the Media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
7.
BodeLeticiaVragaEmily. 2015. “In Related News, That Was Wrong: The Correction of Misinformation Through Related Stories Functionality in Social Media.” Journal of Communication65 (4): 619–38.
8.
BolsenTobyDruckmanJamesCookFay Lomax. 2014. “The Influence of Partisan Motivated Reasoning on Public Opinion.” Political Behavior36 (2): 235–62.
9.
BoykoffMaxwellBoykoffJules M. 2004. “Balance as Bias: Global Warming and the US Prestige Press.” Global Environmental Change14 (2): 125–36.
ClarkeChristopher E.DixonGrahamHoltonAveryMcKeeverBrooke. 2015. “Including Evidentiary Balance in News Media Coverage of Vaccine Risk.” Health Communication30 (5): 461–72.
12.
CookJohnLewandowskyStephanEckerUllrich. 2017. “Neutralizing Misinformation through Inoculation: Exposing Misleading Argumentation Techniques Reduces their Influence.” PLOS ONE12 (5): e0175799.
13.
CoppockAlexanderMcClellanOliver A. 2019. “Validating the Demographic, Political, Psychological, and Experimental Results Obtained from a New Source of Online Survey Respondents.” Research and Politics6 (1): 205316801882217. doi: 10.1177/2053168018822174.
14.
CorbettJulia B.DurfeeJessica L. 2004. “Testing Public Uncertainty of Science: Media Representations of Global Warming.” Science Communication26 (2): 129–51.
15.
DearingJames W. 1995. “Newspaper Coverage of Maverick Science: Creating Controversy through Balancing.” Public Understanding of Science4 (4): 341–361.
16.
DixonGrahamClarkeChristopher E. 2013. “Heightening Uncertainty Around Certain Science Media Coverage, False Balance, and the Autism-Vaccine Controversy.” Science Communication35 (3): 358–82.
17.
DixonGrahamMcKeeverBrookeHoltonAveryClarkeChristopherEoscoGina. 2015. “The Power of a Picture: Overcoming Scientific Misinformation by Communicating Weight-Of-Evidence Information With Visual Exemplars.” Journal of Communication65 (4): 639–59.
EadyGregoryNaglerJonthanGuessAndyZilinskyJanTuckerJoshua. 2019. “How Many People Live in Political Bubbles on Social Media? Evidence from Linked Survey and Twitter Data.” SAGE Open9:1.
20.
EntmanRobert W.1989. Democracy Without Citizens: Media and the Decay of American Politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
21.
FlynnD. J.NyhanBrendanReiflerJason. 2017. “The Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: Understanding False and Unsupported Beliefs About Politics.” Advances in Political Psychology38 (S1): 127–50.
22.
FoxCraigRottenstreichYuval. 2003. “Partition Priming in Judgment under Uncertainty.” Psychological Science14 (3): 195–200.
23.
FritzBenKeeferBryanNyhanBrendan. 2004. All the President's Spin: George W. Bush, the Media, and the Truth. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
24.
GansHerbert. 1979. Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek and Time. New York: Vintage.
25.
GilbertMichael. 2015. “The Problem of Voter Fraud.” Columbia Law Review115 (3): 739–776.
26.
GriffinRobert JDunwoodySharon. 1997. “Community Structure and Science Framing of News About Local Environmental Risks.” Science Communication18 (4): 362–384.
27.
GuessAndrew. 2021. “Almost Everything in Moderation: New Evidence on Americans’ Online Media Diets.” American Journal of Political Science65 (4): 1007–22.
28.
GuessAndrewCoppockAlexander. 2020. “Does Counter-Attitudinal Information Cause Backlash? Results from Three Large Survey Experiments.” British Journal of Political Science50 (4): 1497–515.
29.
HartP. SolNisbetErik. 2012. “Boomerang Effects in Science Communication: How Motivated Reasoning and Identity Cues Amplify Opinion Polarization About Climate Mitigation Policies.” Communication Research396:701–23.
30.
HolmanMiryaLayCeleste. 2019. “They See Dead People Voting: Correcting Misperceptions About Voter Fraud in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election.” Journal of Political Marketing18 (1–2): 31–68.
31.
JamiesonKathleen HallWaldmanPaul. 2004. “The Press Effect: Politicians, Journalists, and the Stories That Shape the Political World.” Political Psychology25 (5): 820–2.
32.
JungherrAndreasSchroederRalph. 2021. “Disinformation and the Structural Transformations of the Public Arena: Addressing the Actual Challenges to Democracy.” Social Media + Society7 (1).
33.
KeithBruce E.MaglebyDavid B.NelsonCandice J.OrrElizabethWestlyeMark C.WolfingerRaymond E. 1986. “The Partisan Affinities of Independent ‘Leaners’.” British Journal of Political Science16 (2): 155–85.
34.
KellnerDouglas. 2018. “Donald Trump and the Politics of Lying.” In Post-Truth, Fake News, ed. PetersMichael A.RiderSharonHyvönenMatsBesleyTina. Singapore: Springer.
35.
KoehlerDerek J. 2016. “Can Journalistic “False Balance” Distort Public Perception of Consensus in Expert Opinion?.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied22 (1): 24–38.
36.
KoehlerJonathanMercerMolly. 2009. “Selection Neglect in Mutual Fund Advertisements.” Management Science55 (7): 1107–1121.
37.
KortenkampKatherineBastenBianca. 2015. “Environmental Science in the Media: Effects of Opposing Viewpoints on Risk and Uncertainty Perceptions.” Science Communication37 (3): 287–313.
38.
KundaZiva. 1990. “The Case for Motivated Reasoning.” Psychological Bulletin108 (3): 480–98.
39.
LevenduskyMatthew. 2010. “Clearer Cues, More Consistent Voters: A Benefit of Elite Polarization.” Political Behavior32 (1): 111–31.
40.
LevittJustin. 2007. “The Truth about Voter Fraud December 13, 2007.” https://ssrn.com/abstract=1647224 or http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1647224.
LewandowskyStephanEckerUllrichSeifertColleen M.SchwarzNorbertCookJ.. 2012. “Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest13 (3): 106–31.
43.
MinniteLorraine. 2010. The Myth of Voter Fraud. NY: Cornell University Press: Ithaca.
44.
NeysDeCromheekeSofieOsmanMagda. 2011. “Biased but in Doubt: Conflict and Decision Confidence.” PLoS ONE6 (1): e15954.
45.
NisbettRichardZukierHenryLemleyRonald. 1981. “The Dilution Effect: Nondiagnostic Information Weakens the Implications of Diagnostic Information.” Cognitive Psychology13 (2): 248–277.
46.
NorrisPippa. 2014. Why Electoral Integrity Matters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
NyhanBrendanReiflerJason. 2010. “When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions.” Political Behavior32 (2): 303–30.
48.
NyhanBrendanReiflerJason. 2012. “Misinformation and Fact-Checking: Research Findings from Social Science.“ New America Foundation Media Policy Initiative Research Paper. Washington, DC.
49.
NyhanBrendanReiflerJason. 2015. “Displacing Misinformation About Events: An Experimental Test of Causal Corrections.” Journal of Experimental Political Science2 (1): 81–93.
50.
PetrocikJohn Richard. 2009. “Measuring Party Support: Leaners Are Not Independents.” Electoral Studies28 (4): 562–72.
PingreeRaymond JamesBrossardDominiqueMcLeodDouglas. 2014. “Effects of Journalistic Adjudication on Factual Beliefs, News Evaluations, Information Seeking, and Epistemic Political Efficacy.” Mass Communication and Society17 (5): 615–38.
54.
RamsayClayKullStevenLewisEvanSubiasStefan. 2010. “Misinformation and the 2010 Election: A study of the U.S. Electorate.” Program on International Policy Attitudes, University of Maryland Dec.10, 2010. April 5, 2021. www.worldpublicopinion.org.
55.
RosenzweigMark RichardUdryChristopher. 2016. “External Validity in a Stochastic World.” NBER Working Paper No. w22449. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2813917.
56.
SkjesethHeidi. 2017. All the president’s lies: Media coverage of lies in the US and France. Reuters Institute
57.
Swire-ThompsonBrionyDeGutisJosephLazerDavid. 2020. “Searching for the Backfire Effect: Measurement and Design Consideration.” Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition9 (3): 286–99.
58.
TaberCharles S.LodgeMilton. 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science50 (3): 755–69.
59.
UscinskiJoeseph E.KlofstadCaseyAtkinsonMatthew D. 2016. “What Drives Conspiratorial Beliefs? The Role of Informational Cues and Predispositions.” Political Research Quarterly69 (1): 57–71.
60.
VosoughiSoroushDebRoySinanAral. 2018. “The Spread of True and False News Online.” Science359 (6380): 1146–1151.
61.
WeeksBrian E.Gil de Zú ˜nigaHomero. 2019. “What’s Next? Six Observations for the Future of Political Misinformation Research.” American Behavioral Scientist65 (2): 277–89.
62.
WilsonDavidBrewerPaul. 2013. “The Foundations of Public Opinion on Voter ID Laws: Political Predispositions, Racial Resentment, and Information Effects.” Public Opinion Quarterly77 (4): 962–84.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
