Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

National newspapers regularly report on public opinion as part of their political coverage. In addition to covering aggregate survey trends, journalists occasionally conduct follow-up interviews with respondents from those surveys to present the views of real people in news stories. The practice of reporting these “qualitative quotes” has existed for decades, yet, there has been little scrutiny of the voices that appear in news stories or their effect on public opinion. We examine this phenomenon in the context of the United States with a historical examination of New York Times stories and other major U.S. outlets that contain polling information and follow-up interviews. Consistent with past work on exemplars, there is considerable evidence for the nonrandom nature of the people invited to comment for news stories. In particular, the use of qualitative quotes reinforces some of the biases that exist in news sourcing more generally. Finally, we demonstrate in an experiment that qualitative quotes influence policy attitudes as least as much as aggregate polling figures.

Keywords

polling survey opinion polls media coverage

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aalberg

Toril

van Aelst

Peter

Curran

James

. 2010. “Media Systems and the Political Information Environment: A Cross-National Comparison.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 15 (3): 255–71.

Althaus

Scott L.

2003. Collective Preferences in Democratic Politics: Opinion Surveys and the Will of the People. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Anderson

Christopher W.

2018. Apostles of Certainty: Data Journalism and the Politics of Doubt. New York: Oxford University Press.

Armstrong

Cory L.

2004. “The Influence of Reporter Gender on Source Selection in Newspaper Stories.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 81 (1): 139–54.

Arpan

Laura M.

2009. “The Effects of Exemplification on Perceptions of News Credibility.” Mass Communication and Society 12:249–70.

Beckers

Kathleen

. 2017. “How Ordinary Is the Ordinary (Wo)man on the Street? An Analysis of Vox Pop Characteristics in Television News.” Journalism Practice 11 (8): 1026–41.

Beckers

Kathleen

Walgrave

Stefaan

Van den Bulk

Hilde

. 2018. “Opinion Balance in Vox Pop Television News.” Journalism Studies 19 (2): 284–96.

Bennett

Lance W.

2012. News: The Politics of Illusion. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Berinsky

Adam

. 2004. Silent Voices: Public Opinion and Political Participation in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

10.

Bhatti

Yosef

Pedersen

Rasmus Tue

. 2016. “News Reporting of Opinion Polls: Journalism and Statistical Noise.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 28 (1): 129–41.

11.

Brookes

Rod

Lewis

Justin

Wahl-Jorgensen

Karin

. 2004. “The Media Representation of Public Opinion: British Television News Coverage of the 2001 General Election.” Media, Culture & Society 26 (1): 63–80.

12.

Brosius

Hans-Bernd

Bathelt

Anke

. 1994. “The Utility of Exemplars in Persuasive Communications.” Communication Research 21 (1): 48–78.

13.

Brown

Jane D.

Bybee

Carl R.

Wearden

Stanley T.

Straughan

Dulci Murdock

. 1987. “Invisible Power: Newspaper News Sources and the Limits of Diversity.” Journalism Quarterly 64 (1): 45–54.

14.

Converse

Philip E.

1996. “The Advent of Polling and Political Representation.” PS: Political Science & Politics 29 (4): 649–57.

15.

Crespi

Irving

. 1980. “Polls as Journalism.” Public Opinion Quarterly 44 (4): 462–76.

16.

Daschmann

Gregor

. 2000. “Vox Pop and Polls: The Impact of Poll Results and Voter Statements in the Media on the Perception of a Climate Opinion.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 12 (2): 160–81.

17.

Druckman

James N.

Jacobs

Lawrence R.

2006. “Lumpers and Splitters: The Public Opinion Information that Politicians Collect and Use.” Public Opinion Quarterly 70 (4): 453–76.

18.

Frankovic

Kathleen A.

1998. “Public Opinion and Polling.” In The Politics of News: The News of Politics, eds. Graber

Doris

McQuail

Denis

Norris

Pippa

, 2nd Edition, 150–71). Washington D.C.: CQ Press.

19.

Geer

John G.

1996. From Tea Leaves to Opinion Polls. New York: Columbia University Press.

20.

Gibson

Rhonda

Zillmann

Dolf

. 1998. “Effects of Citation in Exemplifying Testimony on Issue Perception.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 75 (1): 167–76.

21.

Grabe

Maria E.

Zhou

Shuhua

Barnett

Brooke

. 1999. “Sourcing and Reporting in News Magazine Programs: 60 Minutes versus Hard Copy.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 76 (2): 293–311.

22.

Hamill

Ruth

Wilson

Timothy D.

Nisbett

Richard E.

1980. “Insensitivity to Sample Bias: Generalizing from Atypical Cases.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39(4): 578–589.

23.

Herbst

Susan

. 1993. Numbered Voices: How Opinion Polling Has Shaped American Politics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

24.

Herbst

Susan

. 1994. Politics at the Margin: Historical Studies of Public Expression Outside the Mainstream. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

25.

Hubbard

Lincoln Thomas.

2011. “A Content Analysis of Exemplars in Weekly U.S. News Magazines.” Ph.D. diss., Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.

26.

Key

Valdimer Orlando

. 1961. Public Opinion and American Democracy. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

27.

King

Gary James

Honaker

Anne Joseph

Scheve

Kenneth

. 2001. Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation. American Political Science Review 95 (1): 49–69.

28.

Lefevere

Jonas

De Swert

Knut

Walgrave

Stefaan

. 2012. “Effects of Popular Exemplars in Television News.” Communication Research 39 (1): 103–19.

29.

McLeod

Douglas M.

Hertog

James K.

1992. “The Manufacture of ‘Public Opinion’ by Reporters: Informal Cues for Public Perceptions of Protest Groups.” Discourse & Society 3 (3): 259–75.

30.

Moy

Patricia

Scheufele

Dietram A.

2000. “Media Effects on Political and Social Trust.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 77 (4): 744–59.

31.

Mutz

Diana C.

1998. Impersonal Influence: How Perceptions of Mass Collectives Affect Political Attitudes. New York: Cambridge University Press.

32.

Nadeau

Richard

Cloutier

Edouard

Guay

J. H.

1993. “New Evidence about the Existence of a Bandwagon Effect in the Opinion Formation Process.” International Political Science Review 14 (2): 203–13.

33.

Searles

Kathleen

Ginn

Martha Humphries

Nickens

Jonathan

. 2016. “For Whom the Poll Airs: Comparing Poll Results to Television Poll Coverage.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80 (4): 943–63.

34.

Shoemaker

Pamela J.

Reese

Stephen D.

1996. Mediating the Message: Theories of Influences on Mass Media Content. 2nd Edition. White Plains, NY: Longman.

35.

Sigal

Leon V.

1973. Reporters and Officials: The Organization and Politics of Newsmaking. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.

36.

Toff

Benjamin.

2017. “The ‘Nate Silver Effect’ on Political Journalism: Gatecrashers, Gatekeepers, and Changing Newsroom Practices around Coverage of Public Opinion Polls.” Journalism. Published electronically September 15. doi:10.1177/1464884917731655.

37.

Verba

Sidney

. 1996. “The Citizen as Respondent: Sample Surveys and American Democracy.” American Political Science Review 90 (1): 1–7.

38.

Zillmann

Dolf

Gibson

Rhonda

Sundar

S. Shyam

Perkins

Joseph W.

1996. “Effects of Exemplification in News Reports on the Perception of Social Issues.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 73 (2): 427–44.

39.

Zillmann

Dolf

Perkins

Joseph W.

Jr. Sundar

S. Shyam

. 1992. “Impression-Formation Effects of Printed News Varying in Descriptive Precision and Exemplifications.” Medienpsycho-logie: Zeitschrift fur Individual- und Massenkommunikation 4 (September): 168–85, 239–40.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.17 MB

Qualitative Quotes: The Prevalence and Effects of Survey Respondent Exemplars in Political News Coverage

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material