The personalization of politics has received much attention in both the political science and political communication literature, but the focus has almost entirely been on party leaders and prime ministers. This study investigates the personalization of ministerial communication in Norway, a type of decentralized personalization. It combines a survey of communication workers; in-depth interviews with politicians, communication workers, political reporters, and top-level civil servants; and ethnographic observation inside a ministry. The article goes beyond media-centered perspectives and identifies several potential drivers and barriers to personalization processes. Based on our mixed methods approach, we find that ministerial communication in Norway is strongly centered on the minister in both reactive media management and the proactive promotion of the minister and new policies. This decentralized personalization is driven by both demands from the media and the strategic adaptation by political and administrative actors within ministries. Based on the rich empirically grounded insights, the article discusses how the interplay between the logic of the contemporary commercial news media, political ambitions, internal administrative ambitions, and changes in executive government shapes the personalization of ministerial communication, and illuminates how these multiple drivers of personalization are mutually reinforcing.
AdamSilkeMeierMichaela. 2010. “Personalization of Politics: A Critical Review and Agenda for Future Research.” In Communication Yearbook, ed. SalmonCharles, (Vol. 34., pp. 213–57). London: Routledge.
2.
AltheideDavid L.2004. “Media Logic and Political Communication.” Political Communication21 (3): 293–96.
3.
AskimJosteinKarlsenRuneKolltveitKristoffer. 2017. “Political Appointees in Executive Government: Exploring and Explaining Roles Using a Large-N Survey in Norway.” Public Administration95:342–58. doi:10.1111/padm.12272.
4.
BalmasMeitalRahatGideonSheaferTamirShenhavShaul R.2014. “Two Routes to Personalized Politics: Centralized and Decentralized Personalization.” Party Politics20 (1): 37–51.
5.
BeckettCharlieDeuzeMark. 2016. “On the Role of Emotion in the Future of Journalism.” Social Media & Society2 (3): 1–6. doi:10.1177/2056305116662395.
6.
BjerlingJohannes.2012. “The Personalization of Swedish Politics.” Ph.D. diss., University of Gothenburg.
7.
BrüggemannMichaelEngesserSvenBüchelFlorinHumprechtEddaCastroLaia. 2014. “Hallin and Mancini Revisited: Four Empirical Types of Western Media Systems.” Journal of Communication64:1037–1065.
8.
CampusDonatella. 2010. “Mediatization and Personalization of Politics in Italy and France: The Cases of Berlusconi and Sarkozy.” International Journal of Press/Politics15 (2): 219–35.
9.
CanelMaria J.SandersKaren. 2012. “Government Communication: An Emerging Field in Political Communication Research.” In The Sage Handbook of Political Communication Research, ed. SemetkoH.ScammelM. (pp. 85–96). London: Sage.
10.
CarpenterDaniel P.2001. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, Reputations and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
11.
CarpenterDaniel P.KrauseGeorge A.2012. “Reputation and Public Administration.” Public Administration Review72 (1): 26–32.
12.
ChadwickAndrew. 2013. The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
ChristensenTom. 2005. “The Norwegian State Transformed.” West European Politics29 (1): 1–20.
14.
ChristensenTom. 2011. “The Development and Current Features of the Norwegian Civil Service System.” In Civil Systems in Western Europe, ed. Van Der MeerFrits M. (pp. 67–98). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
15.
ChristensenTomLægreidPer. 2001. “New Public Management: The Effects of Contractualism and Devolution on Political Control.” Public Management Review3 (1): 73–94.
16.
ChristensenTomLægreidPer. 2007. “Regulatory Agencies: The Challenges of Balancing Agency Autonomy and Political Control.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions20 (3): 499–520.
17.
ChristensenTomLægreidPerRonessPaul G.2002. “Increasing Parliamentary Control of the Executive? New Instruments and Emerging Effects.” Journal of Legislative Studies8 (1): 37–62.
18.
DaltonRussellWattenbergMartin P.2000. Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
DavisAeron. 2002. Public Relations Democracy: Public Relations, Democracy and the Mass Media in Britain. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
20.
DongesPatrickJarrenOtfried. 2014. “Mediatization of Political Organizations: Changing Parties and Interest Groups?” In Mediatization of Politics, ed. EsserFrankStömbäckJesper (pp. 181–99). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
21.
DruckmanJames N.WarwickPaul V.2005. “The Missing Piece: Measuring Portfolio Salience in Western European Parliamentary Democracies.” European Journal of Political Research44 (1): 17–42.
22.
FigenschouTine U.ThorbjørnsrudKjersti. 2015. “Backstage Media-Government Negotiations: The Failures and Success of a Government Pitch.” International Journal of Communication9:1947–65.
23.
FoleyMichael. 2000. The British Presidency. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
24.
GarlandRuthTambiniDamianCouldryNick. 2017. “Has Government Been Mediatized? A UK Perspective.” Media, Culture & Society. Published electronically June13. doi:10.1177/0163443717713261.
25.
HallinDaniel C.ManciniPaolo. 2004. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
HeadBrian. 2007. “The Public Service and Government Communications.” In Government Communication in Australia, ed. YoungSally (pp. 36–50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
HeffernanRichard. 2006. “The Prime Minister and the News Media: Political Communication as a Leadership Resource.” Parliamentary Affairs59 (4): 582–98.
28.
HjarvardStig. 2008. “The Mediatization of Society: A Theory of the Media as Agents of Social and Cultural Change.” Nordicom Review29 (2): 105–34.
29.
Holtz-BachaChristinaLangerAna I.MerkleSusanne. 2014. “The Personalization of Politics in Comparative Perspective: Campaign Coverage in Germany and the United Kingdom.” European Journal of Communication29 (2): 153–70.
30.
HorsleySuzanneLiuBrooke F.LevenshusAbbey B.2010. “Comparisons of U.S. Government Communication Practices: Expanding the Government Communication Decision Wheel.” Communication Theory20 (3): 269–95.
31.
JacobsSandraAnkeWonneberger (2017). Did we make it to the news? Effects of actual and perceived media coverage on media orientations of communication professionals. Public Relations Review43 (3): 547–59.
JørgensenTorben B.RutgersMark R.2014. “Public Values: Core or Confusion? Introduction to the Centrality and Puzzlement of Public Values Research.” The American Review of Public Administration45 (1): 3–12.
34.
KarlsenRuneSkogerbøEli. 2015. “Candidate Campaigning in Parliamentary Systems: Individualized vs. Localized Campaigning.” Party Politics21:428–39.
35.
KarpfDavidKreissDanielNielsenRasmus K.PowersMatthew. 2015. “The Role of Qualitative Methods in Political Communication Research: Past, Present, and Future, International.” Journal of Communication9:1888–1906.
36.
KarvonenLauri. 2010. The Personalisation of Politics: A Study of Parliamentary Democracies. Colchester: European Consortium for Political Research Press.
37.
KolltveitKristoffer. 2016. “Spenninger i det Politisk-administrative Systemet: Erfaringer fra Norge” [Tensions in the political-administrative system: Experiences from Norway]. Politica48 (4): 481–96.
38.
KriesiHanspeter. 2012. “Personalization of National Election Campaigns.” Party Politics18 (6): 825–44.
39.
LægreidPerVerhoestKoen, eds. 2010. Governance of Public Sector Organizations: Proliferation, Autonomy and Performance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
40.
LaursenBoValetiniChiara. 2014. “Mediatization and Government Communication: Press Work in the European Parliament.” The International Journal of Press/Politics20 (1): 26–44.
41.
MazzoleniGianpietro. 2000. “A Return to Civic and Political Engagement Prompted by Personalized Political Leadership?” Political Communication17 (4): 325–28.
42.
MazzoleniGianpietroSchulzWinfried. 2010. “Mediatization of politics: A challenge for democracy?” Political Communication16 (3): 247–61.
43.
McAllisterIan. 2007. “The Personalization of Politics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, ed. DaltonRussell J.Hans-DieterKlingemann (pp. 571–88). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44.
MeierKenneth J.HillGregory C.2005. “Bureaucracy in the Twenty-First Century.” In The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, ed. EwanFerlieLynnLaurence E.ChristopherPollitt (pp. 51–71). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45.
MeyrowitzJoshua. 1985. No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behaviour. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
46.
Ministry of Labour and Government Administration. 2009. Central Government Communication Policy. Oslo: Ministry of Labour and Government Administration.
47.
Ministry of Modernization. 2011. Ethical Guidelines for the Public Service. Oslo: Ministry of Modernization.
48.
MulganRichard. 2007. “Truth in Government and the Politicization of Public Service Advice.” Public Administration85 (3): 569–86.
49.
NordLars. 2008. “Comparing Nordic Media Systems: North between West and East.” Central European Journal of Communication1:95–110.
50.
OhlssonJason. 2015. The Nordic Media Market. Gothenburg: Nordic Information Centre for Media and Communication Research (NORDICOM).
51.
OlsenJohan P.2008. “The Ups and Downs of Bureaucratic Organization.” Annual Review of Political Science11:13–37.
52.
O’MalleyEoin. 2007. “The Power of Prime Ministers: Results of an Expert Survey.” International Political Science Review28 (1): 7–27.
53.
PoguntkeThomasWebbPaul, eds. 2005. The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54.
RahatGideonSheaferTamir. 2007. “The Personalization(s) of Politics: Israel, 1949–2003.” Political Communication24 (1): 65–80.
55.
ReunanenEsaKuneliusRistoNoppariElina. 2010. “Mediatization in Context: Consensus Culture, Media and Decision Making in the 21st Century, the Case of Finland.” Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research35:287–307.
56.
RhodesRod A. W.Paul ‘tHartMirkoNoordegraaf. 2007. “Being There.” In Observing Government Elites: Up Close and Personal, ed. RhodesRod A. W.Paul ‘tHartMirkoNoordegraaf (pp. 1–17). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
57.
SandersKaren. 2011. “Political Public Relations and Government Communication.” In Political Public Relations, Principles and Applications, ed. StrömbäckJesperKiousisSpiro. (pp. 254–73). New York, NY: Routledge.
58.
SandersKarenCanelMaria J., eds. 2013. Government Communication: Cases and Challenges. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
59.
SchillemansThomas. 2012. Mediatization of Public Services: How Organizations Adapt to News Media. Frankfurt: Lang.
60.
Statskonsult. 2007. Ja vel, statsråd?. Report nr. 27 [Yes, Minister?]. Oslo: Statskonsult.
61.
StrömbäckJesper. 2008. “Four Phases of Mediatization: An Analysis of the Mediatization of Politics.” The International Journal of Press/Politics13 (3): 228–46.
62.
StrömbäckJesperSpiroKiousis. 2011. Political public relations: Principles and applications. Abington: Routledge.
63.
SwansonDavid L.PaoloMancini eds. 1996. Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy: An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and Their Consequences. Westport, CT: Praeger.
64.
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2002. Regulatory Policies in OECD Countries: From Interventionism to Regulatory Governance. Paris: The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
65.
ThompsonJohn B.1995. The Media and Modernity: A Social Theory of the Media. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
66.
ThorbjørnsrudKjersti. 2013. “The Autonomy of Scandinavian Public Service Broadcasters during Election Campaign Periods: Principles and Practices.” Nordicom Review34 (1): 63–76.
67.
ThorbjørnsrudKjersti. 2015. “Mediatization of Public Bureaucracies: Administrative versus Political Loyalty.” Scandinavian Political Studies38:179–97.
68.
ThorbjørnsrudKjerstiFigenschouTine U.IhlenØyvind. 2014. “Mediatization in Public Bureaucracies: A Typology.” The European Journal of Communication Research39:3–22.
69.
Van AelstPeterSheaferTamir S.HubéNicolasPapathanassopoulosStylianos. 2016. “Personalization.” In Where’s the Good News? Comparing Political Journalism in 16 Countries, ed. De VreeseClaes H.EsserFrankHopmannDavid. (pp. 112–30). London: Routledge.
70.
Van AelstPeterSheaferTamir S.StanyerJames. 2012. “The Personalization of Mediated Political Communication: A Review of Concepts, Operationalizations and Key Findings.” Journalism13 (2): 203–20.
71.
VerhoestKoenVerschuereBramPetersB. GuyBouckaertGeert. 2004. “Controlling Autonomous Public Agencies as an Indicator of New Public Management.” Management International9 (1): 25–35.
72.
WattenbergMartin P.1991. The Rise of Candidate-Centered Politics: Presidential Elections of the 1980s. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
