As part of a larger European Union (EU)-funded project, this paper investigates the coverage of corruption and related topics in three European democracies: France, Italy, and the United Kingdom. Based on Freedom House data, these countries are characterized by different levels of press freedom. A large corpus of newspaper articles (107,248 articles) from the period 2004 to 2013 were analyzed using dedicated software. We demonstrate that freedom of press is not the only dimension that affects the ability to and the way in which news media report on corruption. Because of its political partisanship, the Italian press tends to emphasize and dramatize corruption cases involving domestic public administrators and, in particular, politicians. The British coverage is affected mainly by market factors, and the press pays more attention to cases occurring abroad and in sport. The French coverage shares specific features with both the British and the Italian coverage: Newspapers mainly focus on corruption involving business companies and foreign actors, but they also cover cases involving domestic politicians. Media market segmentation, political parallelism, and media instrumentalization determine different representations preventing the establishment of unanimously shared indignation.
BensonRodney. 2013. Shaping Immigration News. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BesleyTimotyBurgessRobin. 2001. “Political Agency, Government Responsiveness and the Role of the Media.” European Economic Review45 (4): 629–40.
3.
BlumlerJay G.McLeodJack M.RosengrenKarl E.1992. Comparative Speaking: Communication and Culture across Space and Time. Newbury Park: Sage.
4.
BoeriTitoSevergniniBattista. 2008. “The Italian Job: Match Rigging, Career Concerns and Media Concentration in ‘Serie A.’” IZA Discussion Paper No. 3745. http://ftp.iza.org/dp3745.pdf (accessed August 28, 2015).
5.
BrunettiAymoWederBeatrice. 2003. “A Free Press Is Bad News for Corruption.” Journal of Public Economics87 (7–8): 1801–24.
6.
ChowdhuryShyamal K.2004. “The Effect of Democracy and Press Freedom on Corruption: An Empirical Test.” Economics Letters85 (1): 93–101.
7.
CiagliaAntonio. 2013. “Politics in the Media and the Media in Politics: A Comparative Study of the Relationship between the Media and Political Systems in Three European Countries.” European Journal of Communication28 (5): 541–55.
8.
CurranJamesSeatonJean. 1997. Power without Responsibility. London: Routledge.
9.
DavisAeron. 2007. The Mediation of Power. London: Routledge.
10.
DiamondLarryMorlinoLeonardo, eds. 2005. Assessing the Quality of Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
FreilleSebastianHacqueM. EmranulKnellerRichard. 2007. “A Contribution to the Empirics of Press Freedom and Corruption.” European Journal of Political Economy23 (4): 838–62.
13.
GounevPhilipRuggieroVincenzo. 2012. Corruption and Organized Crime in Europe: Illegal Partnerships. London: Routledge.
14.
GrigorescuAlexandru. 2006. “The Corruption Eruption in East-Central Europe: The Increased Salience of Corruption and the Role of Intergovernmental Organizations.” Eastern European Politics and Society20 (3): 516–49.
15.
HallinDaniel C.ManciniPaolo. 2004. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
HallinDaniel C.PapathanassopoulosStylianos. 2002. “Political Clientelism and the Media: Southern Europe and Latin America in Comparative Perspective.” Media, Culture & Society24 (2): 175–95.
17.
HeywoodPaul M.2012. “Integrity Management and the Public Service Ethos in the UK: Patchwork Quilt or Threadbare Blanket?”International Review of Administrative Sciences78 (3): 474–93.
18.
HortonSylvia. 2006. “The Public Service Ethos in the British Civil Service: An Historical Institutional Analysis.” Public Policy and Administration21 (1): 32–48.
19.
KoltsovaOlessia. 2006. News Media and Power in Russia. New York: Routledge.
20.
KuhnRaymond. 1994. The Media in France. New York: Routledge.
21.
KuhnRaymond. 2011. The Media in Contemporary France. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
22.
KuhnRaymond. 2014. “What’s so French about French Political Journalism?” In Political Journalism in Transition: Western Europe in a Comparative Perspective, ed. KuhnRaymondNielsenRasmus K., 26–47. London: I.B. Tauris.
23.
LambsdorffJohann Graf. 2007. The Institutional Economics of Corruption and Reforms: Theory, Evidence and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
LedenevaAlena V.2006. How Russia Really Works: The Informal Practices That Shaped Post Soviet Politics and Business. London: Cornell University Press.
25.
LegnanteGuidoSaniGiacomo. 2008. “Una Breve Campagna Elettorale.” In Il ritorno di Berlusconi: vincitori e vinti nelle elezioni del 2008 [“A Short Election Campaign.” In The Berlusconi’s Comeback: Winners and Losers During the 2008 Elections], ed. Italian National Election Studies, 29–44. Bologna: Il Mulino.
26.
LindstedtCatharinaNaurinDaniel. 2010. “Transparency Is Not Enough: Making Transparency Effective in Reducing Corruption.” International Political Science Review31 (3): 301–22.
27.
ManciniPaolo. 2013. “Media Fragmentation, Party System, and Democracy.” The International Journal of Press/Politics18 (1): 43–60.
28.
MccoyJennifer L.HeckelHeather. 2001. “The Emergence of a Global Anti-corruption Norm.” International Politics38:65–90.
29.
McLachlanShelleyGoldingPeter. 2000. “Tabloidization in the British Press: A Quantitative Investigation into Changes in British Newspapers, 1952–1997.” In Tabloid Tales: Global Debates over Media Standards, ed. SparksColinTullochJohn, 75. Boston: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 75–90.
30.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2008. Corruption: A Glossary of International Standards in Criminal Law. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Glossaries.
31.
PellegattaAlessandroSplendoreSergio. 2014. “Macro, Meso or Micro Level: What Matters the Most on Journalism’s Transparency and Quality of the Press? A Comparative Analysis across 13 Countries.” Presented at the SISP Conference, Perugia, Italy, September 11–13.
32.
PizzornoAlessandro. 1998. Il potere dei giudici: Stato democratico e controllo della virtù [The Power of the Judges: Democratic State and Virtue Control]. Bari, Italy: Laterza.
RothsteinBoTorselloDavide. 2013. “Is Corruption Understood Differently in Different Cultures? Anthropology Meets Political Science.” Working Paper 2013:5. Quality of Government Institute, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
37.
Seymour-UreColin. 1996. The British Press and Broadcasting Since 1945. Oxford: Blackwell.
38.
SheaDaniel M.1999. “All Scandal Politics Is Local: Ethical Lapses, the Media, and Congressional Elections.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics4 (2): 45–62.
StanigPiero. 2015. “Regulation of Speech and Media Coverage of Corruption: An Empirical Analysis of the Mexican Press.” American Journal of Political Science59 (1): 175–93.
41.
StapenhurstRichard. 2000. The Media’s Role in Curbing Corruption. Washington, DC: World Bank Institute.
42.
SzàntòZoltánTóthIstván JánosVargaSzabolcs. 2012. “The Social and Institutional Structure of Corruption: Some Typical Network Configurations of Corruption Transactions in Hungary.” In Networks in Social Policy Problems, ed. VedresBalázsScottiMarco, 156–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
ThompsonJohn B.2000. Political Scandal: Power and Visibility in the Media Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
44.
Transparency International. 2009. The Anti-corruption Plain Language Guide. Berlin: Transparency International.
45.
TreismanDaniel. 2000. “The Causes of Corruption: A Cross-National Study.” Journal of Public Economics76 (3): 399–457.
46.
TsetsuraKaterina. 2005. Bribery for News Coverage: Research in Poland. Gainesville: Institute for Public Relations.
47.
Van KempenHetty. 2007. “Media-Party Parallelism and Its Effects: A Cross-National Comparative Study.” Political Communication24 (3): 303–20.
48.
VannucciAlberto. 2012. Atlante della corruzione [Atlas of Corruption]. Torino, Italy: Edizioni Gruppo Abele.
VoltmerKatrin, ed. 2006. Mass Media and Political Communication in New Democracies. London: Routledge.
51.
VoltmerKatrin. 2013. The Media in Transitional Democracies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
52.
WickbergSofia. 2016. “Framing Corruption in Europe: The (Re)Presentation of a Public Problem through the Lens of the Media.” European Consortium for Political Research. http://ecpr.eu/Events/PaperDetails.aspx?PaperID=28408&EventID=98 (accessed July 24, 2016).
53.
WinnetRobertRaynerGordon. 2009. No Expenses Spared. London: Bantam Press.
54.
WorthyBenMcCleanTom. 2015. “Freedom of Information and Corruption.” In The Routledge Handbook of Political Corruption, ed. HeywoodPaul M., 347–58. New York: Routledge.
55.
YangAimei. 2012. “Assessing Global Inequality of Bribery for News Coverage: A Cross-National Study.” Mass Communication and Society15 (2): 201–24.
56.
ZielonkaJan, ed. 2015. Media and Politics in New Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
