From US President Donald Trump’s Tweet labeling news media “the enemy of the people” to Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s establishment of a politically appointed Media Authority, media freedom is under threat in democracies and nondemocracies alike. According to Freedom House, in 2016 media freedom declined globally to its lowest level since 2003, with Europe experiencing the largest regional decrease. We investigate the relationship between government and media in Hungary and Poland and develop a theory that the rise of nationalist sentiment and leaders who leverage this sentiment to encourage censorship from the bottom-up has led to increased media restrictions from the top-down. We posit that bottom-up censorship will erode media credibility and make people more accepting of top-down media restrictions, which could, in turn, lead to nationalism unchecked by the fourth estate. Using a multilevel analysis of World Values Survey, we analyze the relationship between nationalism and media distrust. Using a cross-national time series, we analyze the relationship between nationalist sentiment and media restrictions. We find that increased nationalism is indeed associated with media distrust and media restrictions.
AchenC. H.2000. “Why Lagged Dependent Variables Can Suppress the Explanatory Power of Other Independent Variables.” Annual Meeting of the Political Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association. UCLA, Los Angeles. https://www.princeton.edu/csdp/events/Achen121201/achen.pdf
3.
AndersonB.1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
4.
AppiahK. A.2006. Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers. London: Penguin.
5.
BjørnskovC.VoigtS.2021. “Is Constitutionalized Media Freedom Only Window Dressing? Evidence from Terrorist Attacks.” Public Choice187:321–48. doi:10.1007/s11127-020-00783-9
6.
BrubakerR.1992. Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
CasagliaA.ColettiR.2021. “Territorializing Threats in Nationalist Populist Narratives: An Italian Perspective on the Migration and Covid-19 Crises.” Space and Polity. Published online October 20. doi:10.1080/13562576.2021.1991783.
8.
DavidovE.2009. “Measurement Equivalence of Nationalism and Constructive Patriotism in the ISSP: 34 Countries in a Comparative Perspective.” Political Analysis17(1): 64–82. doi:10.1093/pan/mpn014
9.
De CleenB. 2017. “Populism and Nationalism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Populism, eds. KaltwasserC. R.TaggartP.EspejoP. O.OstiguyP.Oxford: Oxford University Press
10.
DownieL.2020. “The Trump Administration and the Media: Attacks on the Press Endanger US Democracy and Global Press Freedom.” A Special Report of the Committee to Protect Journalists. Retrieved December 17, 2022. https://cpj.org/reports/2020/04/trump-media-attacks-credibility-leaks/
Freedom House. 2017. Freedom of the Press Index 2017. Washington, D.C.: Freedom House.
13.
GellnerE.1981. “Nationalism.” Theory and Society10(6):723–56.
14.
GleditschK. S.Ward.M. D.1997. “Double Take: A Reexamination of Democracy and Autocracy in Modern Polities.” Journal of Conflict Resolution41(3):361–83.
15.
GriffenS.2020. “Hungary: A Lesson in Media Control.” British Journalism Review31(1):57–62.
16.
HameleersM.BosL.FawziN.ReinemannC.AndreadisI.CorbuN.SchemerC.SchulzA.ShaeferT.AalbergT.AxelssonS.BerganzaR.CremonesiC.DahlbergS.De VreeseC. H.HessA.KartsounidouE.KasprowiczD.MatthesJ.Negrea-BusuiocE.RingdalS.SalgadoS.SandersK.SchmuckD.StrombackJ.SuiterJ.BoomgaardenH.Tenenboim-WeinblattK.Weiss-YanivN.2018. “Start Spreading the News: A Comparative Experiment on the Effects of Populist Communication on Political Engagement in Sixteen European Countries.” The International Journal of Press/Politics23(4):517–38.
KaltwasserC. R.TaggartP.Ochoa EspejoP.OstiguyP., eds. 2017. The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
KellamM.SteinE. A.2016. “Silencing Critics: Why and How Presidents Restrictmedia Freedom in Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies49(1):36–77.
21.
KimH.FordingR. C.1998. “Voter Ideology in Western Democracies, 1946-1989.” European Journal of Political Research33:73–97.
22.
KohnH. (1944). The Idea of Nationalism: A Study in its Origins and Background. New York: Macmillan Co.
23.
Lendvai-BaintonN.Szelewa.D.2021. “Governing New Authoritarianism: Populism, Nationalism and Radical Welfare Reforms in Hungary and Poland.” Social Policy & Administration55(4): 559–72.
24.
LessigL.1999. Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.
MartinL. W.Stevenson.R. T.2010. “The Conditional Impact of Incumbency on Government Formation.” American Political Science Review104(3):503–18.
28.
McCormickJ. M.MitchellN. J.1997. “Human Rights Violations, Umbrella Concepts and Empirical Analysis.” World Politics49(4):510–25.
29.
MußotterM.2022. “We Do Not Measure What We Aim to Measure: Testing Three Measurement Models for Nationalism and Patriotism.” Quality and Quantity56:2177–97. doi:10.1007/s11135-021-01212-9.
30.
MuddeC.2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
MuddeC.2016. “Europe’s Populist Surge: A Long Time in the Making.” Foreign Affairs95(6):25–30.
32.
MužíkM.Šerek.J.2021. “What Reduces Support for Civil Liberties: Authoritarianism, National Identity, and Perceived Threat.” Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy21(1):734–60.
33.
NordenstrengK.2011. Free flow doctrine in global media policy. The Handbook of Hlobal Media and Communication Policy, 79–94.
PerroneA.2019. “Targetting the Messenger: Journalists Ensnared by National Security Legislation, 2014-2018.” Special Report, Index on Censorship, London.
37.
PoeS. C.TateC. N.Keith.L. C.1999. “Repression of the Human Right to Personal Integrity Revisited: A Global Cross-National Study Covering the Years 1976-1993.” International Studies Quarterly43(2):291–313.
38.
PoeS. C.TateN. C.1994. “Repression of Human Rights to Personal Integrity in the 1980s: A Global Analysis.” American Political Science Review88(4):853–72.
39.
Polynczuk-AleniusK.2021. “At the Intersection of Racism and Nationalism: Theorising and Contextualising the ‘Anti-Immigration’ Discourse in Poland.” Nations and Nationalism27(3):766–81.
40.
Press Freedom Act. Hungary Article172010.
41.
ReeskensT.WrightM.2013. “Nationalism and the Cohesive Society: A Multilevel Analysis of the Interplay Among Diversity, National Identity, and Social Capital Across 27 European Societies.” Comparative Political Studies46(2):153–81.
TrumpD. J.2018. (realDonaldTrump). “There is Great Anger in our Country Caused in Part by Inaccurate, and Even Fraudulent, Reporting of the News. The Fake News Media, the True Enemy of the People, Must Stop the Open & Obvious Hostility & Report the News Accurately & Fairly. That Will do Much to Put out the Flame...” October29. Tweet.
50.
United Nations Development Programme. 2016. “Human Development Index (HDI).” Human Development Reports. Retrieved January 10, 2018. http://hdr.undp.org/en/data
51.
Van HauwaertS. M.Van Kessel.S.2018. “Beyond Protest and Discontent: A Cross-National Analysis of the Effect of Populist Attitudes and Issue Positions on Populist Party Support.” European Journal of Political Research57(1):68–92.
52.
VolkensA.LehmannP.MatthießT.MerzN.RegelS.WeßelsB.2017. The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2017a. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB). doi:10.25522/manifesto.mpds.2017a.
53.
VoltmerK.WassermanH.2014. Journalistic norms between universality and domestication: Journalists’ interpretations of press freedom in six new democracies. Global Media and Communication, 10(2), 177–192.
54.
WhittenG.Williams.L.2001. “Buttery Guns and Welfare Hawks: The Politics of Defense Spending in Advanced Industrial Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science55(1):117–34.
55.
Whitten-WoodringJ.Van BelleD.A.2014. Historical guide to world media freedom: A country-by-country analysis. CQ Press.
56.
Whitten-WoodringJ.Van Belle.D.2017. “The Correlates of Media Freedom: An Introduction of the Global Media Freedom Dataset.” Political Science Research and Methods, 5(1):179–88.
57.
WodakR.Boukala.S.2016. “Talking About Solidarity and Security in the Age of Crisis: The Revival of Nationalism and Protectionism in the European Union–A Discourse-Historical Approach.” In Carta C. and Jean-Frédéric Morin (eds), EU Foreign Policy through the Lens of Discourse Analysis: Making sense of diversity. (pp. 187–206). New York, NY:Routledge.
58.
YaziciE.2019. “Nationalism and Human Rights.” Political Research Quarterly72(1):147–61.
59.
ZelizerB.Allan.S.2011. Journalism After September 11. 2nd Edition.London and New York: Routledge.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
