Based on a cross-longitudinal content analysis of 3,624 political news stories published by Chilean national newspapers between 1990 and 2010, this study analyzes the changes and patterns in the reporting styles of the political press by examining the value of objective and analytical reporting used by professional journalists. The study presents empirical evidence on how journalists justify truth claims in political news and how journalistic performance has evolved in a post-dictatorial regime setting. The results show that objective reporting is more common than analytical reporting for both the popular and the elite press. However, although the Chilean traditional press assume objectivity as a criterion of good journalism, they reinterpret its meaning in practice. Specifically, the findings show that the use of analytical reporting has significantly increased in political coverage. The absence of formal separation between facts and opinions in the Chilean case confirms the global tendency toward more partisan journalism, especially in journalistic contexts closer to the “polarized pluralist” model. The differences in the use of objective and analytical reporting between the popular and the elite press do not show a clear pattern.
BensonRandy. 2006. “News Media as a ‘Journalistic Field’: What Bourdieu Adds to New Institutionalism, and Vice Versa.” Political Communication23 (2): 187–202.
2.
BrantsKees. 1998. “Who’s Afraid of Infotainment?”European Journal of Communication13 (3): 315–35.
3.
BresnahanRosalind. 2003. “The Media and the Neoliberal Transition in Chile: Democratic Promise Unfulfilled.” Latin American Perspectives, 30 (6): 39–68.
4.
BucyEricGrabeMaría Elizabeth. 2007. “Taking Television Seriously: A Sound and Image Bite Analysis of Presidential Campaign Coverage, 1992–2004.” Journal of Communication57 (4): 652–75.
5.
De AlburquerqueAlfonso. 2012. “On Models and Margins: Comparative Media Models Viewed from a Brazilian Perspective.” In Comparing Media Systems beyond the Western World, ed. HallinDanielManciniPaolo, 72–95. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
DeuzeMark. 2005. “Popular Journalism and Professional Ideology: Tabloid Reporters and Editors Speak Out.” Media, Culture and Society27(6): 861–82.
7.
DonsbachWolfgangKlettBettina. 1993. “Subjective Objectivity. How Journalists in Four Countries Define a Key Term of Their Profession.” International Communication Gazette51 (1): 53–83.
8.
DonsbachWolfgangPattersonThomas. 2004. “Political News Journalists.” In Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases, and Challenges, ed. EsserFrankPfetschBarbara, 251–270. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
EsserFrank. 2008. “Dimensions of Political News Cultures: Sound Bite and Image Bite News in France, Germany, Great Britain, and the United States.” The International Journal of Press/Politics13 (4): 401–28.
10.
EsserFrankUmbrichtAndrea. 2013. “Competing Models of Journalism? Political Affairs Coverage in US, British, German, Swiss, French and Italian Newspapers.” Journalism14 (8): 989–1007.
11.
FicoFrederickFreedmanEricLoveBrad. 2006. “Partisan and Structural Balance in Newspaper Coverage of US Senate Races in 2004 with Female Nominees.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly83 (1): 43–57.
12.
FoxElizabethWaisbordSilvio, eds. 2002. Latin Politics, Global Media. Austin: University of Texas Press.
13.
GlasserTheodore. 1983. Objectivity and the Ideology of News. Washington, DC: Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse.
14.
HallinDaniel. 1985. “The American News Media: A Critical Theory Perspective.” In Critical Theory and Public Life, ed. ForesterJohn, 121–46. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
HallinDanielManciniPaolo. 2004. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
KaplanRichard. 2006. “The News about New Institutionalism: Journalism’s Ethic of Objectivity and Its Political Origins.” Political Communication23 (2): 173–85.
17.
KovachBillRosenstielTom. 2007. The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect. New York: Random House.
18.
LippmannWalter. 1922. Public Opinion. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
19.
MárquezMireya. 2012. “Valores Normativos y Prácticas de Reporteo en Tensión: Percepciones Profesionales de Periodistas en México” (Normative Values and Reporting Practices in Tension: Professional Perceptions of Journalists in Mexico). Cuadernos de Información30: 97–110.
20.
MazzoleniGianpietro. 2010. La Comunicación Política (Political Communication). Madrid: Alianza.
21.
McNairBrian. 2000. Journalism and Democracy – An Evaluation of the Political Public Sphere. London: Routledge.
MelladoClaudiaHumanesMaría Luisa. 2012. “Modeling Perceived Professional Autonomy in Chilean Journalism.” Journalism13 (8): 985–1003.
24.
MelladoClaudiaMoreiraSoniaLagosClaudiaHernándezMaría Elena. 2012. “Comparing Journalism Cultures in Latin America the case of Chile, Brazil and Mexico.” International Communication Gazette74 (1): 60–77.
25.
MindichDavid. 1998. Just the Facts: How Objectivity Came to Define American Journalism. New York: New York University Press.
26.
Muñoz-TorresJuan Ramón. 2012. “Truth and Objectivity in Journalism: Anatomy of an Endless Misunderstanding.” Journalism Studies13 (4): 566–82.
27.
NaviaPatricio. 2010. “Living in Actually Existing Democracies: Democracy to the Extent Possible in Chile.” Latin American Research Review45 (4): 298–328.
28.
PattersonThomas. 2000. “The United States: News in a Free Market Society.” In Democracy and the Media: A Comparative Perspective, ed. GuntherRichardMughanAnthony, 241–65. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29.
PellegriniSilviaMujicaConstanza. 2006. “Valor Agregado Periodístico (VAP): La Calidad Periodística Como un Factor Productivo en un Entorno Medial Complejo.” (Journalistic Value Added: Journalistic quality as a productive factor in a complex media environment) Palabra Clave9 (1): 11–28.
30.
SchillerDan. 1979. “An Historical Approach to Objectivity and Professionalism in American News Reporting.” Journal of Communication29 (4): 46–57.
31.
SchudsonMichael. 1978. Discovering the News: A Social History of American Newspapers. New York: Basic Books.
32.
SchudsonMichael. 2001. “The Objectivity Norm in American Journalism.” Journalism2 (2): 149–70.
33.
SkovsgaardMortenAlbækErickBroPeterVreeseClaes de. 2012. “A Reality Check: How Journalists’ Role Perceptions Impact Their Implementation of the Objectivity Norm.” Journalism14 (1): 22–42.
34.
SunkelGuillermo. 2001. “Modos de leer en sectores populares: Un caso de recepción.” (Manners of reading in popular sectors: a reception case)Nueva Sociedad175: 143–54.
35.
TuchmanGaye. 1972. “Objectivity as Strategic Ritual: An Examination of Newsmen’s Notions of Objectivity.” American Journal of Sociology77 (4): 660–79.
36.
UmbrichtAndreaEsserFrank. 2014. “Changing Political News? Long-Term Trends in American, British, French, Italian, German and Swiss Press Reporting.” In Political Journalism in Transition: Western Europe in a Comparative Perspective, 195–218 ed. KuhnRaymondKleisRasmus Nielsen. London: IB Tauris.
37.
ValenzuelaSebastiánArriagadaArturo. 2011. “Politics without Citizens? Public Opinion, Television News, the President, and Real-World Factors in Chile, 2000-2005.” The International Journal of Press/Politics16 (3): 357–81.
38.
WaisbordSilvio. 2000. Watchdog Journalism in South America: News, Accountability and Democracy. New York: Columbia University Press.
39.
WaisbordSilvio. 2006. “In Journalism We Trust? Credibility and Fragmented Journalism in Latin America.” In Mass Media and Political Communication in New Democracies, 64–77 ed. VoltmerKatrin. London: Routledge.
40.
WardStephen. 1999. Pragmatic News Objectivity: Objectivity with a Human Face. Cambridge, MA: Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics, and Public Policy, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
41.
WuAmeryZhenLiZumboBruno. 2007. “Decoding the Meaning of Factorial Invariance and Updating the Practice of Multi-group Confirmatory Factor Analysis: A Demonstration with TIMSS Data.” Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation12 (3): 1–26.
42.
ZelizerBarbie. 1993. “Journalists as Interpretive Communities.” Critical Studies in Media Communication10 (3): 219–37.
