The aim of this article is to examine press-party parallelism during the 2011 national elections in Turkey. The article reports findings from a content analysis of 9,127 news articles and editorial columns from fifteen newspapers regarding the trajectory of press-party parallelism over the course of the twelve-week national elections campaign period. We focus on two indicators of press-party parallelism: (1) respective “voice” given to the two leading parties, calculated as the ratio of news that quoted sources from the incumbent Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi (AKP) to the leading opposition party Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi (CHP) and (2) news articles’ tones toward AKP and CHP. The newspapers that were content analyzed were first categorized into three groups based on survey data regarding the voting intentions of their readers: (1) a group of “conservative” newspapers whose readers intended to vote primarily for AKP, (2) a group of “mainstream broadsheets,” and (3) a group of “opposition” newspapers with a readership base intending to vote for CHP. The findings suggest that over the course of the election campaign, internal pluralism in both conservative and opposition papers declined in terms of voice given to respective parties and tone of news coverage.
AlbuquerqueAfonso de. 2005. “Another ‘Fourth Branch’ Press and Political Culture in Brazil.” Journalism6 (4): 486–504.
2.
AndersonSimon P.McLarenJohn. 2012. “Media Mergers and Media Bias with Rational Consumers.” Journal of the European Economic Association10 (4): 831–59.
3.
BakerC. Edwin. 2002. Media, Markets, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BalkirCananBanducciSusanSoyaltinDidemTokerHuriye. 2008. “Expecting the Unforeseeable: The 2007 Turkish Elections in the Media.” Turkish Studies9 (2): 197–212.
5.
BayramSalih. 2010. “Political Parallelism in the Turkish Press, a Historical Interpretation.” Turkish Studies11 (4): 579–611.
6.
BernhardtDanKrasaStefanPolbornMattias. 2008. “Political Polarization and the Electoral Effects of Media Bias.” Journal of Public Economics92 (5–6): 1092–104.
7.
BesleyTimothyPratAndrea. 2006. “Handcuffs for the Grabbing Hand? The Role of the Media in Political Accountability.” American Economic Review96 (3): 720–36.
8.
ÇarkoğluAli. 2011. “Turkey’s 2011 General Elections: Towards a Dominant Party System?” Insight Turkey13 (3): 43–62.
9.
ÇarkoğluAli. 2012. “Economic Evaluations vs. Ideology: Diagnosing the Sources of Electoral Change in Turkey, 2002–2011.” Electoral Studies31 (2): 513–21.
10.
ÇarkoğluAliYavuzGözde. 2010. “Press-Party Parallelism in Turkey: An Individual Level Interpretation.” Turkish Studies11 (4): 613–24.
11.
ChanJimmySuenWing. 2009. “Media as Watchdogs: The Role of News Media in Electoral Competition.” European Economic Review53 (7): 799–814.
12.
ChristensenChristian. 2007. “Concentration of Ownership, the Fall of Unions and Government Legislation in Turkey.” Global Media and Communication3 (2): 179–99.
13.
D’AlessioDaveAllenMike. 2000. “Media Bias in Presidential Elections: A Meta-analysis.” Journal of Communication50 (4): 133–56.
14.
DruckmanJames N.ParkinMichael. 2005. “The Impact of Media Bias: How Editorial Slant Affects Voters.” Journal of Politics67 (4): 1030–49.
15.
FerreeMyra M.GamsonWilliam A.GerhardsJürgen. 2002. Shaping Abortion Discourse: Democracy and the Public Sphere in Germany and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
FinkelAndrew. 2000. “Who Guards the Turkish Press? A Perspective on Press Corruption in Turkey.” Journal of International Affairs54 (1): 147–66.
17.
GentzkowMatthewShapiroJesse M.2010. “What Drives Media Slant? Evidence from U.S. Daily Newspapers.” Econometrica78 (1): 35–71.
18.
GümüşçüSalih. 2013. “The Emerging Predominant Party System in Turkey.” Government and Opposition48:223–44.
19.
HallinDaniel C.ManciniPaolo. 2004. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
HallinDaniel C.PapathanassopoulosStylianos. 2002. “Political Clientelism and the Media: Southern Europe and Latin America in Comparative Perspective.” Media, Culture & Society24 (2): 175–95.
21.
HopmannDavid N.AelstPeter VanLegnanteGuido. 2011. “Political Balance in the News: A Review of Concepts, Operationalizations and Key Findings.” Journalism13 (2): 240–57.
22.
JakubowiczKarol. 2007. Rude Awakening: Social and Media Change in Central and Eastern Europe. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
23.
KalaycıoğluErsin. 2010. “Justice and Development Party at the Helm: Resurgence of Islam or Restitution of the Right-of-Center Predominant Party?” Turkish Studies11 (1): 29–44.
24.
KayaRaşitÇakmurBarış. 2010. “Politics and the Mass Media in Turkey.” Turkish Studies11 (4): 521–37.
25.
LazarsfeldPaulMertonRobert K.1948. “Mass Communication, Popular Taste, and Organized Social Action.” In Communication of Ideas, ed. BrysonLyman, 95–118. New York: Harper.
26.
ManciniPaolo. 2013. “Media Fragmentation, Party System, and Democracy.” The International Journal of Press/Politics18 (1): 43–60.
27.
NeuendorfKimberly. 2002. The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
28.
NivenDavid. 2002. Tilt? The Search for Media Bias. Westport: Praeger Books.
29.
OgnianovaNinaMarthozJean-PaulMahoneyRobertÖğretÖzgürTimurŞafakAkalınNebahat K.İlkizFikret. 2012. Turkey’s Press Freedom Crisis: The Dark Days of Jailing Journalists and Criminalizing Dissent. Committee to Protect Journalists. http://cpj.org/reports/Turkey2012.English.pdf (accessed April 23, 2013).
30.
PapatheodorouFotiniMachinDavid. 2003. “The Post-dictatorial Intimacy between the Political Elite and the Mass Media in Greece and Spain.” European Journal of Communication18 (1): 31–54.
31.
PattersonThomas E.DonsbaghWolfgan. 1996. “News Decisions: Journalists as Partisan Actors.” Political Communication13: 453–68.
32.
PeakeJeffrey S.2007. “Presidents and Front-Page News: How America’s Newspapers Cover the Bush Administration.” The International Journal of Press/Politics12 (4): 52–70.
33.
PempelT. J.1990. “Introduction.” In Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes, ed. PempelT. J., 1–32. Ithaca: Cornell University Press
34.
SartoriGiovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
SayarıSabri. 2007. “Towards a New Turkish Party System?” Turkish Studies8 (2): 197–210.
36.
SemetkoHolli A.2010. “Election Campaigns, Partisan Balance, and the News Media.” In Public Sentinel: News Media & Governance Reform, ed. NorrisPippa, 163–92. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
37.
Seymour-UreColin. 1974. The Political Impact of Mass Media. London: Constable.
38.
Seymour-UreColin. 1998. “Are the Broadsheets Becoming Unhinged?” The Political Quarterly69 (Issue B): 43–54.
39.
StrömbäckJ.2008. “Four Phases of Mediatization: An Analysis of the Mediatization of Politics.” The International Journal of Press/Politics13 (3): 228–46.
40.
TreschAnke. 2009. “Politicians in the Media: Determinants of Legislators’ Presence and Prominence in Swiss Newspapers.” The International Journal of Press/Politics14 (1): 67–90.
41.
Van BelleDouglas. A.2000. Press Freedom and Global Politics. Westport: Praeger Books.
42.
Van KempenHetty. 2007. “Media-Party Parallelism and Its Effects: A Cross-National Comparative Study.” Political Communication24 (3): 303–20.
43.
VoltmerKatrin. 2012. “How Far Can Media Systems Travel? Applying Hallin and Mancini’s Comparative Framework Outside the Western World.” In Comparing Media Systems beyond the Western World, ed. HallinDaniel C.ManciniPaolo, 224–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
WilkeJürgenReinemannCarsten. 2001. “Do the Candidates Matter? Long-Term Trends of Campaign Coverage: A Study of the German Press since 1949.” European Journal of Communication16 (3): 291–314.
45.
WringDominicDeaconDavid. 2010. “Patterns of Press Partisanship in the 2010 General Election.” British Politics5 (4): 436–54.
