Though modern presidents seem to be less persuasive in their public campaigns for policy, they are more likely to go public. In addition, they publicly campaign for policies that they could enact without the support of Congress or the public. The dominant view emphasizes the persuasive capacity of the president or his ability to set the agenda of various government institutions; however, this neglects one of the more powerful components of the bully pulpit. I demonstrate that presidents can use the bully pulpit to remove issues from the national news agenda with relative ease. By modeling the daily change in national media content, I show that presidents can divert the attention of the national media away from issues that are less desirable toward more favorable issues with a single televised address. This suggests that the bully pulpit is more powerful than the current literature expects.
BarrettAndrew W.2004. “Gone Public the Impact of Going Public on Presidential Legislative Success.” American Politics Research32:338–70.
4.
BaumMatthew A.KernellSamuel. 1999. “Has Cable Ended the Golden Age of Presidential Television?” American Political Science Review93:99–114.
5.
BaumgartnerFrank R.BerryJeffrey M.HojnackiMarieKimballDavid C.LeechBeth. 2009. Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
BaumgartnerFrank R.JonesBryan D.1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics, American Politics and Political Economy Series. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
BennettW. Lance. 1996. “An Introduction to Journalism Norms and Representations of Politics.” Political Communication13:373–84.
8.
BennettW. LanceEntmanRobert M.2001. Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy, Communication, Society, and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BennettW. LanceLawrenceRegina G.LivingstonSteven. 2007. When the Press Fails: Political Power and the News Media from Iraq to Katrina, Studies in Communication, Media, and Public Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
BiesanzJeremy C.Deeb-SossaNataliaPapadakisAlison A.BollenKenneth A.CurranPatrick J.2004. “The Role of Coding Time in Estimating and Interpreting Growth Curve Models.” Psychological Methods9:30.
BushGeorge W.2010. Decision Points. 1st Edition. New York: Crown Publishers.
13.
Canes-WroneBrandice. 2006. Who Leads Whom?: Presidents, Policy, and the Public, Studies in Communication, Media, and Public Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
CohenJeff E.1995. “Presidential Rhetoric and the Public Agenda.” American Journal of Political Science39:87–107.
15.
CohenJeff E.2008. The Presidency in the Era of 24-Hour News. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
16.
CohenJeff E.2010. Going Local: Presidential Leadership in the Post-Broadcast Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
CookFay LomaxTylerTom R.GoetzEdward G.GordonMargaret T.ProtessDavidLeffDonna R.MolotchHarvey L.1983. “Media and Agenda Setting - Effects on the Public, Interest Group Leaders, Policy Makers, and Policy.” Public Opinion Quarterly47:16–35.
18.
DownsAnthony. 1972. “Up and Down with Ecology: The Issue Attention Cycle.” Public Interest28:38–50.
19.
DuncanTerry E.DuncanSusan C.StryckerLisa A.2006. An Introduction to Latent Variable Growth Curve Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
20.
EdwardsGeorge C.2003. On Deaf Ears: The Limits of the Bully Pulpit. New Haven: Yale University Press.
21.
EdwardsGeorge C.2009. The Strategic President: Persuasion and Opportunity in Presidential Leadership. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
22.
EdwardsGeorge C.WoodB. Dan. 1999. “Who Influences Whom? The President, Congress, and the Media.” American Political Science Review93:327–44.
23.
ErbringLutzGoldenbergEdie N.MillerArthur H.1980. “Front-Page News and Real-World Cues: New Look at Agenda-Setting by the Media.” American Journal of Political Science24:16–49.
24.
Eshbaugh-SohaMatthew. 2006. The President’s Speeches: Beyond “Going Public.”Boulder: Rienner.
25.
Eshbaugh-SohaMatthewPeakeJeffrey S.2004. “Presidential Influence over the Systemic Agenda.” Congress & the Presidency31:181–201.
26.
Eshbaugh-SohaMatthewPeakeJeffrey S.2005. “Presidents and the Economic Agenda.” Political Research Quarterly58:127–38.
27.
Eshbaugh-SohaM.PeakeJeffrey S. (2006). “The contemporary presidency: “Going local” to reform Social Security.” Presidential Studies Quarterly36(4): 689-704.
28.
Eshbaugh-SohaMatthewPeakeJeffrey S.2011. Breaking through the Noise: Presidential Leadership, Public Opinion, and the News Media, Studies in the Modern Presidency. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
HillKim Quaile. 1998. “The Policy Agendas of the President and the Mass Public: A Research Validation and Extension.” American Journal of Political Science42:1328–34.
31.
IyengarShantoSimonAdam. 1993. “News Coverage of the Gulf Crisis and Public-Opinion: A Study of Agenda-Setting, Priming, and Framing.” Communication Research20:365–83.
32.
KernellSamuel. 1986. Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
33.
KernellSamuel. 1997. Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership. 3rd Edition.Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
34.
KernellSamuelRiceLaurie L.2011. “Cable and the Partisan Polarization of the President’s Audience.” Presidential Studies Quarterly41:693–711.
35.
KingdonJohn W.1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. 2nd Edition.New York: Longman.
36.
KosukeImaiKingGaryLauOliva. 2007. “Poisson: Poisson Regression for Event Count Dependent Variables.” Zelig: Everyone’s Statistical Software, http://Gking.Harvard.Edu/Zelig (accessed September 25, 2013).
37.
KrosnickJon A.KinderDonald R.1990. “Altering the Foundations of Support for the President through Priming.” The American Political Science Review84:497–512.
38.
LightPaul Charles. 1999. The President’s Agenda: Domestic Policy Choice from Kennedy to Clinton. 3rd Edition.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
39.
LongJ. Scott. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Vol. 7. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
40.
McCombsMaxwell E.ShawDonald L.1972. “The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media.” Public Opinion Quarterly36:176–187.
41.
MillerJoanneKrosnickJon A.1997. “Anatomy of News Media Priming.” In Do the Media Govern. Pages 258-283. Ed.s Iyengar, Shanto and Richard Reeves. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
42.
MillerJoanne M.KrosnickJon A.2000. “News Media Impact on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations: Politically Knowledgeable Citizens Are Guided by a Trusted Source.” American Journal of Political Science44:301–15.
43.
MinYongyiAgrestiAlan. 2005. “Random Effect Models for Repeated Measures of Zero-Inflated Count Data.” Statistical Modelling5:1–19.
44.
NeustadtRichard E.1960. Presidential Power: The Politics of Leadership from FDR to Carter. New York: Wiley.
45.
NisbetMatthew C.HugeMike. 2006. “Attention Cycles and Frames in the Plant Biotechnology Debate: Managing Power and Participation through the Press/Policy Connection.” Harvard International Journal of Press-Politics11:3–40.
PattersonThomas E.1996. “Bad News, Bad Governance.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science546:97–108.
48.
PeakeJeffrey S.2007. “Presidents and Front-Page News: How America’s Newspapers Cover the Bush Administration.” Harvard International Journal of Press-Politics12:52–70.
49.
PetersB. GuyHogwoodBrain W.1985. “In Search of the Issue-Attention Cycle.” Journal of Politics47:238–53.
50.
Rabe-HeskethSophiaSkrondalAnders. 2012. Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata. 3rd Edition, 2 Vols. College Station: Stata Press.
51.
RosenstielTomMitchellAmyHitlinPaulJiHong. 2007–2012. News Coverage Index. Edited by Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center.
52.
RottinghausB.2010. The Provisional Pulpit: Modern Presidential Leadership of Public Opinion. Texas: A&M University Press.
53.
SkrondalAndersRabe-HeskethSophia. 2010. Multilevel Modelling. 4 Vols., SAGE Benchmarks in Social Research Methods. Los Angeles: SAGE.
54.
SnijdersTom A. B.BoskerRoel J.2011. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. 2nd Edition.Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
55.
TulisJeffrey. 1987. The Rhetorical Presidency. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
56.
WhitfordAndrew B.YatesJeff. 2009. Presidential Rhetoric and the Public Agenda: Constructing the War on Drugs. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
57.
YatesJeff L.WhitfordAndrew B.GillespieWilliam. 2005. “Agenda Setting, Issue Priorities, and Organizational Maintenance: The US Supreme Court, 1955 to 1994.” British Journal of Political Science35:357–68.
58.
YoungGarryPerkinsWilliam B.2005. “Presidential Rhetoric, the Public Agenda, and the End of Presidential Television’s ‘Golden Age’” The Journal of Politics67:1190–205.
59.
ZallerJohnChiuDennis. 1996. “Government’s Little Helper: US Press Coverage of Foreign Policy Crises, 1945–1991.” Political Communication13:385–405.
60.
ZallerJohn R.1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
