This study tests the generalizability of agenda-setting theory in less developed democracies by analyzing data on public opinion, television news coverage, presidential policy, and real-world indicators from Chile between 2000 and 2005. After tracking attention to five different issues—crime, unemployment, health, poverty, and education—we estimate both average and issue-specific agenda-setting effects using time-series, cross-sectional ordinary least squares (OLS) regressions. The results show that there are multidirectional influences between the public, television news, and the president. Both the public and the president appeared responsive to prior news coverage, and while news coverage was not influenced by public attention, it was affected by presidential rhetoric. While these processes differed from one issue to another, overall there was a top-down pattern of agenda adoption: Policy preferences are “negotiated” between the president and the news media, with no noticeable input from the public. From a comparative perspective, the evidence shows that television news in Chile are considerably powerful and that citizens’ priorities are basically ignored by the elites, although their maneuvering is still constrained by objective conditions.
Alves, R.2005. "From Lapdog to Watchdog: The Role of the Press in Latin American Democratization." In Making Journalists, ed. H. de Burgh, 181-201. New York: Routledge.
2.
Aninat, C., J. Landregan, P. Navia, and J. Vial.2006. Political Institutions, Policymaking Processes and Policy Outcomes in Chile. Washington, D.C. : Inter-American Development Bank.
3.
Bartels, L.M.1996. "Politicians and the Press: Who Leads, Who Follows?"Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA, September.
4.
Beck, N.2001. "Time-Series Cross-Section Data: What Have We Learned in the Past Few Years?" Annual Review of Political Science4 (1): 271-93.
5.
Beck, N., and J.N. Katz.1995. "What to Do and Not to Do with Time-Series Cross-Section Data."American Political Science Review89: 634-47.
6.
Behr, R.L., and S. Iyengar.1985. "Television News, Real-World Cues, and Changes in the Public Agenda."Public Opinion Quarterly49: 38-57.
7.
Bresnahan, R.2003. "The Media and the Neoliberal Transition in Chile: Democratic Promise Unfulfilled." Latin American Perspectives30 (6): 39-68.
8.
Brooks, J.E.1985. "Democratic Frustration in the Anglo-American Polities: A Quantification of Inconsistency between Mass Public Opinion and Public Policy ." Western Political Quarterly38: 250-61.
9.
Brooks, J.E.1990. "The Opinion-Policy Nexus in Germany."Public Opinion Quarterly54: 508-29.
10.
Carmines, E.G., and J.A. Stimson.1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
CEP.2002. "Estudio nacional de opinión pública: Julio 2002." <http://www.cepchile.cl/dms/lang_1/doc_3126.html> (accessed March 15, 2009).
12.
Cohen, B.1963. The Press and Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
Cohen, J.E.1995. "Presidential Rhetoric and the Public Agenda." American Journal of Political Science, 39: 87-107.
14.
Cook, T.E.1998. Governing with the News: The News Media as a Political Institution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
15.
Cordero, R., and C. Marín .2005. "Los medios masivos y las transformaciones de la esfera pública en Chile." Persona y Sociedad19 (3): 233-58.
16.
Dahl, R.A.1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17.
Dahl, R.A.1999. On Democracy. New Haven, CT : Yale University Press.
18.
Dammert, L., and M.F.T. Malone.2003. "Fear of Crime or Fear of Life? Public Insecurities in Chile." Bulletin of Latin American Research22 (1): 79-101.
19.
Dearing, J.W.1989. "Setting the Agenda for the Issue of AIDS." Public Opinion Quarterly53: 309-29.
20.
Delli-Carpini, M.X., and S. Keeter.1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21.
Dermota, K.L.2003. And Well Tied Down: Chile’s Press under Democracy . Westport, CT: Praeger.
22.
Dussaillant, P.2005. Medios y elecciones: La elección presidencial de 1999. Santiago, Chile: Centro de Estudios Bicentenario/CIMAS.
23.
Edelman, M.1964. The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana : University of Illinois Press.
24.
Edwards, G.C., III, and B.D. Wood.1999. "Who Influences Whom? The President, Congress, and the Media."American Political Science Review93: 327-44.
25.
Ferraro, A.2008. "Friends in High Places: Congressional Influence on the Bureaucracy in Chile." Latin American Politics and Society50: 101-29.
26.
Gilberg, S., C.H. Eyal, M. McCombs, and D. Nicholas.1980. "The State of the Union Address and the Press Agenda." Journalism Quarterly57: 584-88.
27.
Gronemeyer, M.E.2002. "Periodistas chilenos: El reto de formar profesionales autónomos e independientes." Cuadernos de Información15: 53-70.
28.
Hill, K.Q.1998. "The Policy Agendas of the President and the Mass Public: A Research Validation and Extension." American Journal of Political Science42: 1328-34.
29.
Holst, J., U. Laaser, and J. Hohmann.2004. "Chilean Health Insurance System: A Source of Inequity and Selective Social Insecurity." Journal of Public Health12: 271-82.
30.
Hughes, S.2007. "Explaining Press Performance in New Democracies: The Organizational Imperative." Taiwan Journal of Democracy3 (1): 79-97.
31.
Icso-Udp.2004. "Medios masivos y élites políticas: Un estudio de opinión de 100 líderes políticos." <www.udp.cl/icso/investigacion/doc/100lideres.pdf> (accessed April 5, 2005).
32.
Icso-Udp.2008. Encuesta nacional de opinión pública. Santiago, Chile: UDP.
33.
Iyengar, S., and D.R. Kinder.1987. News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
34.
Jennings, W., and P. John.2009. "The Dynamics of Political Attention: Public Opinion and the Queen’s Speech in the United Kingdom." American Journal of Political Science53: 838-54.
35.
Jiménez, J., L. Argandoña, and R. Torres.2007. "El fortalecimiento de la televisión abierta como centro de la dieta informativa de los chilenos." In La función política de la televisión: Tendencias, contenidos y desafíos en el Chile de hoy, ed. Secretaría de Comunicaciones- Ministerio Secretaría General de Gobierno, 135-59. Santiago, Chile: Secretaría de Comunicaciones, Ministerio Secretaría General de Gobierno.
36.
Johnson, T.J., W. Wanta, and T. Boudreau.2004. "Drug Peddlers: How Four Presidents Attempted to Influence Media and Public Concern on the Drug Issue." Atlantic Journal of Communication12 (4): 177-99.
37.
Jones, B., and F. Baumgartner.2005. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
38.
Kiousis, S.2003. "Job Approval and Favorability: The Impact of Media Attention to the Monica Lewinsky Scandal on Public Opinion of President Bill Clinton ." Mass Communication and Society6: 435-51.
39.
Lang, G.E., and K. Lang.1981. "Watergate: An Explosion of the Agenda-Building Process." In Mass Communication Review Yearbook, ed. G. C. Wilhoit and H. de Bock , 447-68. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
40.
Lippmann, W.1922. Public Opinion. New York, NY : Macmillan.
41.
Mainwaring, S., and T.R. Scully.2008. "Latin America: Eight Lessons for Governance ." Journal of Democracy19: 113-27.
42.
Matear, A.2006. "Barriers to Equitable Access: Higher Education Policy and Practice in Chile since 1990." Higher Education Policy19: 31-49.
43.
Mazzoleni, G., and W. Schulz.1999. "‘Mediatization’ of Politics: A Challenge for Democracy?" Political Communication16: 247-61.
44.
McCombs, M.2004. Setting the Agenda: The Mass Media and Public Opinion . Cambridge, UK: Polity.
45.
McCombs, M., and D.L. Shaw.1972. "The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media."Public Opinion Quarterly36 (2): 176-87.
46.
Miller, W., and D. Stokes.1963. Constituency Influence in Congress . American Political Science Review57: 45-57.
47.
Ministerio de Planificación de Chile.2007. La situación de la pobreza en Chile. Santiago, Chile: Ministerio de Planificación de Chile.
48.
Norris, P., ed. 1999. Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance. Oxford , UK: Oxford University Press.
49.
Otano, R., and G. Sunkel.2003. "Libertad de los periodistas en los medios."Revista Comunicación y Medios14, http://www.icei.uchile.cl/comunicacionymedios/14otanoysunkel.html (accessed June 4, 2008).
50.
Peake, J.S., and M. Eshbaugh-Soha .2008. "The Agenda-Setting Impact of Major Presidential TV Addresses."Political Communication25: 113-37.
51.
Pritchard, D.1992. "The News Media and Public Policy Agendas." In Public Opinion, the Press, and Public Policy, ed. J. D. Kennamer, 103-12. Westport, CT: Praeger .
52.
Pritchard, D., and D. Berkowitz.1993. "The Limits of Agenda-Setting: The Press and Political Responses to Crime in the United States, 1950-1980." International Journal of Public Opinion Research5 (1): 86-91.
53.
Protess, D.L., F.L. Cook, J.C. Doppelt, J.S. Ettema, M.T. Gordon, D.R. Leff, et al. 1991. The Journalism of Outrage: Investigative Reporting and Agenda Building in America. New York, NY : Guilford.
54.
Puente, S., and C. Mujica.2006. "What’s News in Chile?" In News around the World: Content, Practitioners, and the Public, ed. P. J. Shoemaker and A. A. Cohen, 119-40. New York, NY: Routledge .
55.
Riffe, D., B. Ellis, M.K. Rogers, R.L. Van Ommeren, and K.A. Woodman.1986. "Gatekeeping and the Network News Mix ." Journalism Quarterly63: 315-21.
56.
Rogers, E.M., J.W. Dearing, and S. Chang.1991. "AIDS in the 1980s: The Agenda-Setting Process of a Public Issue." Journalism Monographs126.
57.
Shah, D.V., M.D. Watts, D. Domke, and D.P. Fan.2002. "News Framing and Cueing of Issue Regimes: Explaining Clinton’s Public Approval in Spite of Scandal." Public Opinion Quarterly66: 339-70.
58.
Shaw, D.L., and M. McCombs.1977. The Emergence of American Political Issues. St. Paul, MN: West.
59.
Sheafer, T.2007. "How to Evaluate It: The Role of Story-Evaluative Tone in Agenda Setting and Priming." Journal of Communication57: 21-39.
60.
Siavelis, P.2002. "Exaggerated Presidentialism and Moderate Presidents: Executive/Legislative Relations in Chile." In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. S. Morgenstern and B. Nacif, 79-113. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
61.
Siavelis, P.2008. "Elite-Mass Congruence and the Quality of Democracy in Chile" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA .
62.
Sigal, L.V.1973. Reporters and Officials: The Organization and Politics of Newsmaking. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
63.
Soroka, S.N.2002a. Agenda-Setting Dynamics in Canada. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia Press .
64.
Soroka, S.N.2002b. "Issue Attributes and Agenda-Setting by Media, the Public, and Policy-makers in Canada." International Journal of Public Opinion Research14: 264-85.
65.
Sunkel, G., and Geoffroy, E.2001. Concentración económica de los medios de comunicación. Santiago, Chile: LOM Ediciones.
66.
Tironi, E., and G. Sunkel.2000. "The Modernization of Communications: The Media in the Transition to Democracy in Chile." In Democracy and the Media, ed. R. Gunther and A. Mughan, 165-194. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
67.
Torche, F.2005. "Privatization Reform and Inequality of Educational Opportunity: The Case of Chile." Sociology of Education78: 316-43.
68.
Valenzuela, S., and A. Arriagada.2009. "The Competition for Similarity in Chilean News Broadcasts and Newspapers 2000-2005."Cuadernos de Información24: 41-52.
69.
Valenzuela, S., and T. Correa.2009. "Press Coverage and Public Opinion on Women Candidates: The Case of Chile’s Michelle Bachelet." International Communication Gazette71:203-223.
70.
Waisbord, S.2009. "Research Directions for Global Journalism Studies: Ideas from Latin America." Journalism10: 393-95.
71.
Walgrave, S., S. Soroka, and M. Nuytemans.2008. "The Mass Media’s Political Agenda-Setting Power: A Longitudinal Analysis of Media, Parliament, and Government in Belgium 1993 to 2000." Comparative Political Studies41: 814-36.
72.
Walgrave, S., and P. Van Aelst .2006. "The Contingency of the Mass Media’s Political Agenda Setting Power: Toward a Preliminary Theory ." Journal of Communication56: 88-109.
73.
Wanta, W., and S. Ghanem.2006. "Effects of Agenda Setting." In Mass Media Effects Research: Advances through Meta-Analysis, ed. R. W. Preiss, B. M. Gayle, N. Burrell, M. Allen and J. Bryant , 37-51. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
74.
Wanta, W., and Y.-W. Hu.1994. "Time-Lag Differences in the Agenda-Setting Process: An Examination of Five News Media." International Journal of Public Opinion Research6: 225-40.
75.
Wanta, W., M.A. Stephenson, J.V. Turk, and M.E. McCombs.1989. "How President’s State of Union Talk Influenced News Media Agendas." Journalism Quarterly66: 537-41.
76.
Weaver, D., D. Graber, M. McCombs, and C. Eyal.1981. Media Agenda Setting in a Presidential Election: Issues, Images and Interest. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
77.
Williams, B.A., and M.X. Delli Carpini .2004. "Monica and Bill All the Time and Everywhere: The Collapse of Gatekeeping and Agenda Setting in the New Media Environment." American Behavioral Scientist47: 1208-30.
78.
Wlezien, C.1995. "The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending." American Journal of Political Science39: 981-1000.
79.
Wlezien, C.2005. "On the Salience of Political Issues: The Problem with ‘Most Important Problem.’" Electoral Studies24: 555-79.
80.
Wlezien, C., and S.N. Soroka.2007. "The Relationship between Public Opinion and Policy." In Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, ed. R. J. Dalton and H.-D. Klingemann, 799-817. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
81.
Yagade, A., and D.M. Dozier.1990. "The Media-Agenda Setting Effect of Concrete versus Abstract Issues."Journalism Quarterly67: 3-10.
82.
Zaller, J.1998. "Monica Lewinsky’s Contribution to Political Science ." PS: Political Science and Politics31: 182-89.
83.
Zucker, H.G.1978. "The Variable Nature of News Media Influence." Communication Yearbook2: 225-40.
