This article interprets the mediatization of television news generally and political news specifically in United Kingdom (U.K.) public and commercial evening bulletins. We argue that routine conventions (edited packages or two-ways) reflect different types of journalistic interventions, with the use of live, unscripted, and interpretive news practices representing a greater degree of mediatization, since they resemble the style and format of 24-hour media rather than fixed time bulletins. Our content analysis (N = 902) found more live news on commercial bulletins, but all broadcasters exhibited a degree of immediacy and interpretation in their editorial practices. This was most apparent in live two-ways—notably on Channel Five—which produced less source-driven political journalism than edited packages, with political editors playing the role of primary definer. The concept of mediatization, we suggest, can help interpret whether fixed time bulletins conform to their own media logic or adopt the values of 24/7 media.
AalbergTorilStrömbäckJesperde VreeseClaes H.2012. “The Framing of Politics as Strategy and Game: A Review of Concepts, Operationalizations and Key Findings.”Journalism: Theory, Practice and Criticism13 (2): 162–78.
2.
BennettLance W.Entman.Robert M.2001. Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
CottleSimon. 2006. Mediatized Conflict: Developments in Media and Conflict Studies. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
4.
CushionStephen. 2012a. Television Journalism. London: SAGE.
5.
CushionStephen. 2012b. The Democratic Value of News: Why Public Service Media Matter. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
6.
CushionStephenAalbergTorilThomasRichard. Forthcoming. “The Mediatization of News and Journalistic Interventions: A Comparative Analysis of Television Bulletins in the US, UK and Norway.”
7.
CushionStephenLewisJustin. 2010. The Rise of 24-Hour News: Global Perspectives. New York: Peter Lang.
8.
DavisAeron. 2006. The Mediation of Power. London: Routledge.
9.
EsserFrank. 2008. “Dimensions of Political News Cultures: Sound Bite and Image Bite News in France, Germany, Great Britain and the United States.”The International Journal of Press/Politics13 (4): 401–28.
10.
FleissJ. L.1981. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 2nd ed.New York: John Wiley.
11.
GaltungJohanRugeMari M.1965. “The Structure of Foreign News.”Journal of International Peace Research1:64–90.
12.
GrabeMaria ElizabethPage BucyErik. 2009. Image Bite Politics: News and the Visual Framing of Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
GrøttumEva-ThereseAalbergToril. 2012. “Incomprehensible News. How Pre-Knowledge Requirements and Expert Sources Make Political News Coverage Incomprehensive.”Norsk Statsvitenskapelig Tidsskrift1:3–23.
14.
HallStuartCritcherChasJeffersonTonyClarkeJohnRobertsBrian. 1978. Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State, and Law and Order. London: Macmillan.
15.
HallinDaniel. 1992. “Sound Bite News: Television Coverage of Elections, 1968-1988.”Journal of Communication42 (2): 5–24.
16.
HarcupTonyDeirdreO’Neil. 2001. “What Is News? Galtung and Ruge Revisited.”Journalism Studies2 (2): 261–80.
17.
HijavardStig. 2008. “The Mediatization of Society: A Theory of the Media as Agents of Social and Cultural Change.”Nordicom Review29 (2): 105–34.
18.
JeritJennifer. 2009. “Understanding the Knowledge Gap: The Role of Experts and Journalists.”Journal of Politics71 (2): 442–56.
19.
LewisJustin. 2001. Constructing Public Opinion: How Political Elites Do What They Like and Why We Seem to Go along with It. New York: Columbia University Press.
20.
LundbyKunt. 2009a. “Introduction: Mediatization as Key”. In Mediatization: Concept, Changes, Consequences, ed. LundbyKunt. New York: Peter Lang.
21.
LundbyKunt. ed. 2009b. Mediatization: Concept, Changes, Consequences. New York: Peter Lang.
22.
MacGregorB.1997. Live, Direct and Biased: Making Television News in the Satellite Age. London: Arnold.
23.
MazzoleniGianpietroSchulzWinfried. 1999. “Mediatization of Politics: A Challenge for Democracy?”Political Communication16 (3): 247–61.
24.
McNairBrianHibberdMatthewSchlesingerPhilip. 2003. Mediated Access: Broadcasting and Democratic Participation in the Age of Mediated Politics. Luton, UK: University of Luton Press.
25.
MontgomeryMartin. 2006. “Broadcast News, the Live ‘Two-Way’ and the Case of Andrew Gilligan.”Media, Culture & Society28 (2): 233–59.
26.
MontgomeryMartin. 2007. The Discourse of Broadcast News: A Linguistic Approach. London: Routledge.
27.
Ofcom. 2011. Ofcom’s UK Audience Attitudes to the Broadcast Media. London: Ofcom publication.
28.
RosenbergHowardFeldmanCharles. 2008. No Time to Think: The Menace of Media Speed and the 24-Hhour News Cycle. New York: Continuum.
29.
SemetkoHolli A.BlumlerJay G.GurevitchMichaelWeaverDavid H.1991. The Formation of Campaign Agendas: A Comparative Analysis of Party and Media Roles in Recent American and British Elections. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30.
SteeleCatherine A.BarnhurstG. Kevin. 1996. “The Journalism of Opinion: Network Coverage in US Presidential Campaigns, 1968-1988.”Critical Studies in Mass Communication13 (3): 187–209.
31.
StrömbäckJesper. 2008. “Four Phases of Mediatization: An Analysis of the Mediatization of Politics.”The International Journal of Press/Politics13 (3): 228–46.
32.
StrömbäckJasperDimitrovaDaniela V.2011. “Mediatization and Media Interventionism: A Comparative Analysis of Sweden and the United States.”The International Journal of Press/Politics16 (1): 30–49.
33.
SnoeijerRolandVreeseClaes H.Semetko.Holli A.2002. “Research Note: The Effects of Live Television Reporting on Recall and Appreciation of Political News.”The European Journal of Communication17 (1): 85–101.
34.
WashbourneNeil. 2010. Mediating Politics: Newspapers, Radio, Television and the Internet. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
