The demands brought on public relations (PR) by management can only be met by more evidence-based procedures. Of course, single and subjective experiences are also a form of “evidence” but they are of a different kind and of a different quality because they often are not measurable, not quantifiable, and not repeatable. Thus, they are nontheoretical in a sense as described above. This article takes a look at what communication research can offer to PR practice. Three main services are discussed: (1) modeling the field and its variables, (2) providing methods for the measurement of PR effectiveness, and (3) measuring PR effectiveness and its quality.
BaruchY.1999. “Response Rate in Academic Studies—A Comparative Analysis.” Human Relations52:421–38.
4.
BaumM. A.GroehlingT.2008. “New Media and the Polarization of American Political Discourse.” Political Communication25:345–65.
5.
BenteleG.LiebertT.SeelingS.1997. Von der Determination zur Intereffikation. Ein integriertes Modell zum Verhältnis von Public Relations und Journalismus [From determination to intereffication: An integrated model of public relations and journalism]. In Aktuelle Entstehung von Öffentlichkeit. Akteure, Strukturen, Veränderungen, ed. BenteleG.HallerM.Konstanz: UVK, 225–50.
6.
BishopB.2008. The Big Sort. Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America Is Tearing Us Apart. Orlando: Houghton Mufflin Harcourt.
7.
ComteA.2008. System der positiven Politik. Reprint, Wien: Turia & Kant.
8.
DonsbachW.WenzelA.2002. “Aktivität und Passivität von Journalisten gegenüber parlamentarischer Pressearbeit. Inhaltsanalyse von Pressemitteilungen und Presseberichterstattung am Beispiel der Fraktionen des Sächsischen Landtags” [Activity and passivity of journalists towards parliamentary public relations. A content analysis of press releases and press reports about the political parties in the Saxon parliament]. Publizistik47:373–87.
9.
DonsbachW.MeissnerA.2004. PR und Nachrichtenagenturen. Missing Link in der kommunikationswissenschaftlichen Forschung [PR and news agencies. The missing link in communication research on PR]. In Quo vadis Public Relations? ed. RauppJulianeKlewesJoachimWiesbaden: Verlag Sozialwissenschaften, 97–112.
10.
FestingerL.1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
11.
FombrunC. J.1996. Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
FuchsD.1992. “Öffentliche Kommunikationsbereitschaft. Ein Test zentraler Bestandteile der Theorie der Schweigespirale.” Zeitschrift für Soziologie21:284–95.
14.
GonzenbachW. J.KingC.JablonskiP.1999. “Homosexuals and the Military: An Analysis of the Spiral of Silence.” Howard Journal of Communication, 4:281–96.
15.
HergerN.2004. Organisationskommunikation. Beobachtung und Steuerung eines organisationalen Risikos [Organizational communication. Observations and steering of an organizational risk]. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
16.
HonL. C.GrunigJ.1999. Guidelines for Measuring Relationships in Public Relations. Gainesville, FL: Institute for Public Relations.
17.
IyengarS.HahnK. S.2009. “Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use.” Journal of Communication59:19–39.
18.
KovachB.2006. “Toward a New Journalism with Verification.” Nieman Reports, 60(4):39–41.
19.
MüllerJ.2005. Effizienz lokaler Public Relations. Der Einfluss verschiedener PR-Instrumente auf die regionale Berichterstattung [Effectiveness of local public relations. The influence of different PR tools on the regional coverage]. MA thesis, University of Dresden.
20.
MyersonR. B.1997. Game Theory. Analysis of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
Noelle-NeumannE.1980. Die Schweigespirale. Öffentliche Meinung—unsere soziale Haut. Munich: Langen Müller.
22.
ParsonsT.SmelserN.1956. Economy and Society: A Study in the Integration of Economic and Social Theory. London: Routledge & Kegan.
23.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T.1986. Communication and Persuasion. New York: Springer.
24.
Pew Center for the People and the Press. 2008. Internet overtakes newspapers as news outlet. www.people-press.org (accessed December 23, 2010).
Reese-SchäferW.2005. Marx und die Furcht vor der Anarchie des Marktes. In Karl Marx’ kommunistischer Individualismus, ed. PiesI.LeschkeM., 99–111.
27.
Russ-MohlS.ZavarittG.MerkelB.2007. A Complicated, Antagonistic & Symbiotic Affair: Journalism, Public Relations and Their Struggle for Public Attention. Bellinzona: Casagrande.
28.
ShanahanJ.ScheufeleD. A.YangF.HiziS.2004. “Cultivation and Spiral of Silence Effects: The Case of Smoking.” Mass Communication and Society, 4:413–28.
29.
ShannonC. E.1948. “A Mathematical Theory of Communication.” The Bell System Technical Journal, 27:379–23, 623–56.
30.
ShonfieldA.1965. Modern Capitalism: The Changing Balance of Public and Private Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
StreeckW.2008. Von der gesteuerten Demokratie zum selbststeuernden Kapitalismus: Die Sozialwissenschaften in der Liberalisierung. Cologne: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.
WehmeierS.2008. “Intereffication Approach in Public Relations.” In The International Encyclopedia of Communication, ed. DonsbachW.Vol. 6. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2354–58.
34.
ZerfaßA.2005. “Rituale der Verifikation. Grundlagen und Grenzen des Kommunikations-Controlling.” In Distinktion und Deutungsmacht. Studien zu Theorie und Pragmatik der Public Relations, ed. RademacherL. S.183–222, Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.
35.
ZerfaßA.2004. Unternehmensführung und Öffentlichkeitsarbeit. Grundlegung einer Theorie der Unternehmenskommunikation und Public Relations (Corporate leadership and public relations. Basics of a theory of corporate communication and public relation). 2nd Edition. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
