The press plays a crucial role early in the preprimary presidential campaign, determining which candidates appear viable to voters, contributors, and other media. This process necessarily benefits some candidates over others. We analyze how the press winnowed the candidate fields of both parties in the early 2008 preprimary campaign. We find coverage remarkably similar across a wide range of traditional and new media, including newspaper, radio, television, cable, legacy and web-native Internet news, and talk shows. The media ignored most candidates to concentrate on the Democratic contest between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama while paying less attention to the Republican race. Tone towards candidates was uniform except on partisan talk shows. The tone of Internet news was slightly more balanced than traditional outlets. Similar coverage across media results from journalistic preference for dramatic story lines, staffing constraints, and widespread speculation about candidate viability, which we describe as “handicapping the candidates.”
AlthausScott L.EdyJill A.EntmanRobert M.PhalenPatricia. 1996. “Revising the Indexing Hypothesis: Officials, Media, and the Libya Crisis.” Political Communication13(4):407–21.
2.
BennettW. Lance. 1990. “Towards a Theory of Press-State Relations in the United States.” Journal of Communication40(2):103–27.
3.
BennettW. Lance. 2005. “The Twilight of Mass Media News: Markets, Citizenship, Technology, and the Future of Journalism.” In Freeing the Presses: The First Amendment in Action, ed. CookT. E.Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
4.
BennettW. Lance. 2009. News: The Politics of Illusion. 8th Edition.New York: Longman.
5.
BennettW. LanceEntmanRobert M., eds. 2001. Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BennettW. LanceIyengarShanto. 2008. “A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication.” Journal of Communication58(4):707–31.
7.
BowmanLeo. 2008. “Re-Examining ‘Gatekeeping’: How Journalists Communicate the Truth about Power to the Public.” Journalism Practice2(1):99−112.
8.
BennettW. LanceIyengarShanto. 2010. “The Shifting Foundations of Political Communication: Responding to a Defense of the Media Effects Paradigm.” Journal of Communication60(1):35–39.
9.
BrohC. Anthony. 1987. A Horse of a Different Color: Television’s Treatment of Jesse Jackson’s 1984 Presidential Campaign. Washington, D.C.: Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies.
10.
CappellaJoseph N.JamiesonKathleen Hall. 1996. Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
ColemanStephenBlumlerJay G.2009. The Internet and Democratic Citizenship: Theory, Practice and Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12.
CookTimothy E.2001. “The Future of the Institutional Media.” In Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy, ed. BennettW. LanceEntmanRobert M.New York: Cambridge University Press.
13.
CrouseTimothy. 1973. The Boys on the Bus. New York: Random House.
14.
MichaelDelli Carpini. 2005. “News from Somewhere: Journalistic Frames and the Debate over ‘Public Journalism.’” In Framing American Politics, ed. CallaghanKarenSchnellFraukePittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
15.
DruckmanJamie. 2004. “Priming the Vote: Campaign Effects in a U.S. Senate Election.” Political Psychology25(4):577–94.
16.
FunkCarolyn L.1999. “Bringing the Candidate into Models of Candidate Evaluation.” Journal of Politics61(3):700–20.
17.
GansHerbert J.1979. Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. New York: Pantheon.
18.
GraberDoris A.1988. Processing the News: How People Tame the Information Tide. 2nd Edition.New York: Longman.
19.
GraberDoris A.2011. On Media: Making Sense of Politics. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
20.
HadleyArthur. 1976. The Invisible Primary. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21.
HarpazBeth. 2001. The Girls in the Van. New York: Thomas Dunne Books.
22.
HaynesAudrey A.FlowersJulianne F.GurianPaul-Henri. 2002. “Getting the Message Out: Candidate Communication Strategy during the Invisible Primary.” Political Research Quarterly55(3):633–52.
23.
HolbrookThomas M.1996. Do Campaigns Matter?Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
HindmanMatthew. 2009. The Myth of Digital Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
JamiesonKathleen Hall, ed. 2006. Electing the President, 2004. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
26.
JamiesonKathleen HallCappellaJoseph N.2008. Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
JustMarion R.2011. “What’s News in the 21st Century?” In Oxford Handbook of Public Opinion and Media, ed. ShapiroRobert Y.JacobsLawrence R.New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
JustMarion R.CriglerAnn N.AlgerDean E.CookTimothy E.KernMontagueWestDarrell M.1996. Crosstalk: Citizens, Candidates and the Media in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
KerbelMatthew R.2009. Netroots: Online Progressives and the Transformation of American Politics. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
30.
LawrenceRegina G.RoseMelody. 2010. Hillary Clinton’s Race for the White House: Gender & Politics on the Campaign Trail. Boulder, CO: Lynn Rienner.
31.
LazarsfeldPaul F.MertonRobert K.1948. “Mass Communication, Popular Taste, and Organized Social Action.” In The Communication of Ideas, ed. BrysonLyman. New York: Harper & Brothers.
32.
LichterRobert S.NoyesRichard E.1995. Good Intentions Make Bad News: Why Americans Hate Campaign Journalism. 2nd Edition.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
33.
MerminJonathan. 1996. “Television News and American Intervention in Somalia: The Myth of a Media-Driven Foreign Policy.” Political Science Quarterly112(3):385–403.
34.
MutzDiana C. 1995. “Effects of Horse-Race Coverage on Campaign Coffers: Strategic Contributing in Presidential Primaries.” Journal of Politics57(4):1015–42.
35.
NewportFrankJonesJeffrey M.SaadLydiaGallupAlec M.IsraelFred L.2009. Winning the White House 2008: The Gallup Poll, Public Opinion and the Presidency. New York: Infobase.
36.
OwenDiana. 2005. “‘New Media’ and Contemporary Interpretations of Freedom of the Press.” In Freeing the Presses: The First Amendment in Action, ed. CookT. E.Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
37.
PattersonThomas E.1980. The Mass Media Election: How Americans Choose their President. New York: Praeger.
38.
PattersonThomas E.1994. Out of Order. New York: Vintage.
39.
PattersonThomas E.DonsbachWolfgang. 1996. “News Decisions: Journalists as Partisan Actors.” Political Communication13(4):455–68.
RobinsonMichael J.SheehanMargaret A.1983. Over the Wire and on TV: CBS and UPI in Campaign ‘80. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
42.
RyfeDavid Michael. 2006. “The Nature of News Rules.” Political Communication23(2):203−14.
43.
StuckeyMaryCurryKristina. 2008. “Presidential Elections and the Media.” In Media Power, Media Politics, ed. RozellMarkMayerJeremy. 2nd Edition.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
44.
SunsteinCass. 2007. Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45.
SwerdlowJoel. 1988. “The Decline of the Boys on the Bus.” In Impact of Mass Media: Current Issues, ed. HiebertRay EldonReussCarol. New York: Longman.
46.
WinogradMorelyHaisMichael D.2008. Millennial Makeover: MySpace, YouTube & the Future of American Politics. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
47.
ZallerJohn. 1994. “Strategic Politicians, Public Opinion, and the Gulf Crisis.” In Taken by Storm: The Media, Public Opinion, and US Foreign Policy in the Gulf War, ed. BennettW. LancePaletzDavid L.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
