This article looks at the role of media in political decision making by making use of Parson’s concept of political power. It enables a look at how media is both an essential resource of political power and a crucial factor in the environment in which political power works. Drawing on a qualitative interview sample of 60 elite decision makers and an elite survey (N = 419), Finnish decision making is found to be quite thoroughly mediatized. Mediatization is differentiated in distinct actor profiles found with Latent Class Analysis of the survey data. The most prominent pattern seems to be that mediatization correlates with other power resources. Those who have official status and are actively involved in policy networks also make use of media resources, and to differing extents adapt their actions to the demands of the media. However, there are also groups of decision makers who still seem to be quite independent of the media.
AspKent. 1986. Mäktiga massmedier. Studier i politisk opinionsbildning [The Powerful Mass Media. Studies in Political Opinion Formantion] Stockholm: Akademilitteratur.
2.
BartelsLarry M.1996. “Politicians and the Press. Who Leads, Who Follows?” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Political Science Association, San Francisco, September 1996.
3.
BergerBruce K.2001. “Private Issues and Public Policy: Locating the Corporate Agenda in Agenda Setting Theory.” Journal of Public Relations Research13 (2): 91–126.
4.
CouldryNick. 2008. “Mediatization or Mediation? Alternative Understandings of the Emergent Space of Digital Storytelling.” New Media & Society10 (3): 373–91.
5.
DavisAeron. 2007. The Mediation of Power. A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.
6.
DavisAeron. 2010. Political Communication and Social Theory. London: Routledge.
7.
EsserFrankStrömbäckJesper. 2009. “Shaping Politics: Mediatization and Media Interventionism.” In Mediatization. Concepts, Changes, Consequences, ed. LundbyKnut E.New York: Peter Lang.
8.
DriessensOlivierRaeymaeckersKarinHansVerstraetenVandenbusscheSarah. 2010. “Personalization According to Politicians: A Practice Theoretical Analysis of Mediatization.” Communications35 (3): 309-326.
9.
GitlinTodd. 2003. Media Unlimited. How the Torrent of Images and Sounds Overwhelms Our Lives. New York: Metropolitan Books.
10.
HallinDaniel C.ManciniPaolo. 2004. Comparing Media Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
HjarvardStig. 2008. “The Mediatization of Society. A Theory of the Media as Agents of Social and Cultural Change.” Nordicom Review29 (2): 105–34.
12.
KempfWilhelm. 1994. “Towards an Integration of Quantitative and Qualitative Content Analysis in Propaganda Research.” Diskussionsbeiträge Nr 27/1994 der Projektgruppe Friedensforschung Projekt 13/85, Universität Konstanz.
13.
KrotzFriedrich. 2009. “Mediatization: A Concept with Which to Grasp Media and Societal Change.” In Mediatization. Concepts, Changes, Consequences, ed. LundbyKnut E.New York: Peter Lang.
14.
KuneliusRistoNoppariElinaReunanenEsa. 2009. Media vallan verkoissa [Media in Power]. Department of Journalism and Mass Communication, series A 112. Tampere: University of Tampere.
15.
LinskyMartin. 1986. Impact. How the Press Affects Federal Policy Making. London: Norton.
16.
LivingstoneSonya. 2009. “On the Mediation of Everything: ICA Presidential Address 2008.” Journal of Communication59: 1–18.
17.
LundbyKnut E.2009. Mediatization. Concepts, Changes, Consequences. New York: Peter Lang.
18.
MazzoleniGianpietroSchulzWinfried. 1999. “‘Mediatization’ of Politics: A Challenge for Democracy?”Political Communication16: 247–61.
19.
McCutcheonAllan L.1987. “Latent Class Analysis.” Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications on Social Sciences 64. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
MerminJ.1997. “Television News and American Intervention in Somalia: The Myth of a Media-Driven Foreign Policy.” Political Science Quarterly112 (3): 385–403.
21.
ParsonsTalcott. 1986. “Power and the Social System.” In Power, ed. LukesSteven. New York: New York University Press. First published 1963 as “On the Concept of Political Power.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, June 1963: 232–262.
22.
ReunanenEsaKuneliusRistoNoppariElina. 2010. “Mediatization in Context: Consensus Culture, Media and Decision Making in the 21st Century, the Case of Finland.” Communications35: 287–307.
23.
ReunanenEsaSuikkanenRisto. 1999. Latent Class Analysis: Wandering in Latent Space. Diskussionsbeiträge 44 der Projektgruppe Friedensforschung. Konstanz: Universität Konstanz. [http://kops.ub.uni-konstanz.de/volltexte/1999/117/pdf/117_1.pdf] (accessed October 9, 2010)
24.
RobinsonPiers. 2000. “The Policy-Media Interaction Model: Measuring Media Power during Humanitarian Crisis.” Journal of Peace Research37 (5): 613–33.
25.
RuostetsaariIlkka. 2003. Valta muutoksessa [Power in Change]. Helsinki: WSOY.
26.
SchudsonMichael. 2003. The Sociology of News. New York: Norton.
27.
SilverstoneRoger. 2007. Media and Morality. On the Rise of the Mediapolis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
28.
SmithMartin J.1993. Pressure, Power and Policy. State Autonomy and Policy Networks in Britain and the United States. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
29.
Spörer-WagnerDoreenMarcinkowskiFrank. 2010. “Is Talk Always Silver and Silence Golden? The Mediatisation of Political Bargaining.” Javnost—The Public17 (2): 5–26.
30.
StrömbäckJesper. 2008. “Four Phases of Mediatization: An Analysis of the Mediatization of Politics.” International Journal of Press/Politics13 (3): 228–46.
31.
ThompsonJohn B.1995. The Media and Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
32.
Van AelstPeterWalgraveStefaan. 2011. “Minimal or Massive? The Political Agenda-Setting Power of the Mass Media According to Different Methods.” International Journal of Press/Politics16 (3): 295–313.
33.
WalgraveStefaan. 2008. “Again, the Almighty Mass Media? The Media’s Political Agenda-Setting Power According to Politicians and Journalists in Belgium.” Political Communication25: 445–59.
34.
WalgraveStefaanVan AelstPeter. 2006. “The Contingency of the Mass Media’s Political Agenda Setting Power: Toward a Preliminary Theory.” Journal of Communication56: 88–109.
