Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study aims to identify the viewpoints of adult learners in an online graduate program in Human Resource Development (HRD) based on their assessment of how program elements have benefited their careers. Thirty-seven capstone students in a university’s graduate HRD program ranked 28 statements about aspects of the program, from “has most contributed to your career” to “most has not contributed to your career.” Using Q methodology, which relies on a combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis, this study delves into these adult learners’ perspectives on the HRD program. Data analysis revealed four different factors, with one factor split. A holistic interpretation of the four factors revealed divergent viewpoints of these adult learners. The Well-Rounded Strategist values developing leadership skills, while the Applied Researcher values the real-world assignments that are integral to the program. The Data-Driven Strategist values how the program develops data-analytic skills to drive decision-making and lead change. This factor was split with the Basic Skills-Networker. This person values working collaboratively to develop skills that will enable them to stand out as an exemplary employee. Finally, the People Leader focuses on elements of the HRD program that develop the ability to understand diverse viewpoints and build a positive work culture. The findings can be used to help the HRD program optimize the curriculum, ensuring that the diverse needs of student stakeholders are addressed. Additionally, the study demonstrates how a unique approach can be applied in an online environment to gain an understanding of learners’ diverse perspectives.

Keywords

Q methodology human resource development graduate education organizational development program evaluation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Banasick

(2019). KADE: A desktop application for Q-methodology. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(38), 1360. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01360

Bartlett

J. E.

DeWeese

(2015). Using the Q methodology approach in human resource development research. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 17(1), 72–87.

Brown

S. R.

(1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. Yale University Press.

Caffarella

R. S.

Daffron

S. R.

(2013). Planning programs for adult learners: A practical guide. Jossey-Bass.

Cho

Zachmeier

(2015). HRD educators’ views on teaching and learning: An international perspective. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 17(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422315572618

Dieteren

C. M.

Patty

N. J.

Reckers-Droog

V. T.

van Exel

(2023). Methodological choices in applications of Q methodology: A systematic literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7(1), 100404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100404

Eden

Donaldson

Walker

(2005). Structuring subjectivities? Using Q methodology in human geography. Area, 37(4), 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2005.00641.x

Fraschini

Park

(2022). A Q methodology study to explore Korean as a second language undergraduate student-teachers’ anxiety. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3, 100132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100132

Gaudet

Vincent

(1993). Characteristics of training and human resource development degree programs in the United States. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 35(3), 138–159.

10.

Greer

C. R.

Waight

C. L.

(2017). The value of an undergraduate HRD degree: An exploratory investigation of perceived employability and career success. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 19(2), 190–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422317695230

11.

Kuchinke

K. P.

(2002). Institutional and curricular characteristics of leading graduate HRD programs in the United States. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13(2), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1019

12.

Kuchinke

K. P.

(2003). Comparing national systems of human resource development: Role and function of post-baccalaureate HRD courses of study in the UK and US. Human Resource Development International, 6(3), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678860210136071

13.

(2024). Reskilling and upskilling the future-ready workforce for industry 4.0 and beyond. Information Systems Frontiers, 26(5), 1697–1712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10308-y

14.

Lim

D. H.

Song

J. H.

Choi

Kim

H. K.

(2013). A comparative analysis of graduate HRD curricular content between the United States and Korea. Human Resource Development International, 16(4), 441–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2013.803752

15.

Lundberg

de Leeuw

R. R.

(2024). Introducing and discussing the virtual special issue on using Q methodology in higher education. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 6, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100301

16.

Lundberg

de Leeuw

R. R.

Aliani

(2020). Using Q methodology: Sorting out subjectivity in educational research. Educational Research Review, 31, 100361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100361

17.

Mainardes

E. W.

Ferreira

J. M.

Tontini

(2011). Creating a competitive advantage in Higher Education Institutions: Proposal and test of a conceptual model. International Journal of Management in Education, 5(2–3), 145–168. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMIE.2011.039482

18.

Marsick

V. J.

Watkins

K. E.

(2015). Informal and incidental learning in the workplace. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315715926

19.

McKeown

Thomas

D. B.

(2013). Q methodology (Vol. 66). Sage.

20.

Merriam

S. B.

Bierema

L. L.

(2013). Adult learning: Linking theory and practice. John Wiley & Sons.

21.

Niu

Zhu

Hunter-Johnson

(2022). Investigating self-perceived employability, ambition, and university commitment of students in HRD programs. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Perspectives in Higher Education, 7(1), 1–30.

22.

Opatrny-Yazell

C. M.

Solon

K. N.

Peck

M. R.

(2024). Creating societal impact through learner empowerment. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 36(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/19394225231221122

23.

Ramlo

S. E.

(2008). Student perspectives on learning physics and their relationship with learning force and motion concepts: A study using Q methodology. Human Subjectivity, 2(1), 73–90.

24.

Ramlo

S. E.

Newman

(2011). Q methodology and its position in the mixed methods continuum. Operant Subjectivity, 34(3), 172. https://doi.org/10.22488/okstate.11.100594

25.

Reio

T. G.

Jr. (2010). The threat of common method variance bias to theory building. Human Resource Development Review, 9(4), 405–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484310380331

26.

Rose

K. J.

(2023). Using classification of instructional program codes in human resource development. Human Resource Development Review, 22(3), 428–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843231184101

27.

Ruona

W. E.

(2016). Evolving human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 18(4), 551–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422316660968

28.

Sim

Bierema

L. L.

(2023). Infusing intersectional pedagogy into adult education and human resource development graduate education. Adult Education Quarterly, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/07417136231198049

29.

Stephenson

(1953). The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology. University of Chicago Press.

30.

Stephenson

(1978). Concourse theory of communication. Communication, 3(1), 21–40.

31.

Watts

Stenner

(2012). Doing Q methodological research: Theory, method, and interpretation. Sage.

32.

Yang

(2023). Creating learning personas for collaborative learning in higher education: A Q methodology approach. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 4, 100250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100250

33.

Zachmeier

Cho

Kim

(2014). The same but different: HRD master’s programmes in the United States. Human Resource Development International, 17(3), 318–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2014.896129

Using Q-Methodology to Identify Viewpoints of Adult Learners in an Online Graduate Program in Human Resource Development

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References