An analysis of twenty websites operated by hospitality and tourism companies found numerous issues that would interfere with the use of those websites by persons with visual impairments. While the U.S. courts have been mixed on the question of whether the Americans with Disabilities Act applies to websites, the wise course is for hotel and tourism companies to ensure that those with visual impairments are easily able to use their sites. One source of design guidelines is the Web Content Accessibility Priority 1 Guidelines, developed by the World Wide Web Consortium.
Hooks v. OKBridge, Inc. No. 99-50891 (W.D. Tex. June 28, 1999 ), http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/briefs/hooks.htm .
5.
National Federation of the Blind/America Online Accessibility Agreement2000, http://www.nfb.org/tech/accessibility.htm .
6.
Martin v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority, Civil Action File No 1:0l-Cv-3255-Twt, U.S. District Ct for The Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division; 225 F. Supp. 2d 1362; 2002 U.S. Dist. Lexis 19650.
7.
Access Now, Inc. and Robert Gumson v. Southwest Airlines, No. 02-16163 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 385 F.3d 1324; 2004 U.S.App./Lexis 200060; 16 Am. Disabilities Case (BNA) 296; 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1064 (2004).
8.
“ About Alexia Internet,” 2006, http:www.alexa.com/site/company.
9.
Chi-square = 281.637; asymptotic p value = .0001 (p value < .05).
10.
Chi-square = 10.942; asymptotic p value = .926; df = 19, supporting Hypothesis 1o (p value < .05).
11.
Ahmed, S., M. Barber, and A. D'Astous.1998. Segmentation of the Nordic winter sun seekers market. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing7 (1): 39-63.
12.
American Foundation for the Blind.2004. Comments on prescription drug information accessibility. http://www.afb.org/Section.asp?SectionID=3&TopicID=315&DocumentID=2454 .
13.
Austrialian Human Rights & Equal Opportunity Commission Disability Rights. n.d. D.D.A. guide: What's it all about?http://www.hreoc.gov.au/disability_rights/dda_guide/about/about.html .
14.
Berniker, Mark.2003. Study net has both supporters, skeptics. http://www.clickz.com/showPage.html?page=1577601.
Conover, W.J.1999. Practical nonparametric statistics. New York: John Wiley.
18.
Creed, Adam.2000. Olympics site discriminates against the blind. Newsbytes, August. http://www.computeruser.com/news/00/08/29/news4.html .
19.
De Paula, M.2003. Banks have far to go on accessibility for the blind . USBanker113 (8): 12. Retrieved from ABI/INFORM Global Database (August 11, 2005).
20.
Doty, David.1992. The impact of federal labor policy on the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990: Collective bargaining agreements in a new era of civil rights. Brigham Young University Law Review4:1055-90.
21.
Eastman, Jacqueline, and Rajesh Iyer.2004. The elderly's uses and attitudes towards the internet. Journal of Consumer Marketing21 (3): 208-220.
22.
Elliott, Christopher.2005. Convenience, but not for everyone. New York Times, June 28, p. C7.
23.
Greenspan, R.2003. Senior surfing surges. November 20. http://www.clickz.com/showPage.html?page=31118-71 (accessed June 14, 2007).
24.
Heim, Judy.2000. Locking out the disabled: Office buildings have wheelchair ramps, TV has closed captions, but many websites are inaccessible to people with disabilities. PCWorld Magazine, September. http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,17690-page,1/article.html.
25.
Hopkins, H.2007. Analysis: Older people fastest growing online segment in the UK. May 18. http://www.dmwmedia.com/news/2007/05/18/analysis-older-people-fastest-growing-online-segment-in-the-uk (accessed June 14, 2007).
26.
Kreismann, Ronald, and Richard Palmer.2001. Reasonable accommodation under the ADA: What's an employer to do?Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly42:24-33.
27.
Loy, Beth.2001. Deciphering access for people with disabilities . http://www.digitaldivide.net/articles/view.php?ArticleID=204 .
28.
McGrane, Sally.2000. Is the web truly accessible to the disabled?http://www.cnet.com/4520-6022_1-105103-1.html?tag=feat.1.
29.
M2 Presswire.2000. RNIB: High street shops online fail blind internet users. January 18. Retrieved from Proquest database (August 31, 2006).
30.
National Eye Institute.2006. National plan for eye and vision research: Low vision and blindness rehabilitation . December. http://www.nei.nih.gov/strategicplanning/np_low.asp (accessed June 14, 2007).
31.
National Federation of the Blind.1999. National Federation of the Blind sues America Online, Inchttp://www.nfb.org/bm/bm99/bm991201.htm.
32.
O'Brien, Eileen.2005. The evolution of screen reader technology. http://www.ldt.stanford.edu//∼emobrien/377_paper.doc.
33.
Rouse, Veronica.1999. Making the web accessible. Computers in Libraries16 (6): 49-54.
34.
Royal National Institute of Blind People.2000. High street shops fail blind internet users. New Beacon84 (990). http://www.rnib.org.uk/xpedio/groups/public/documents/visugate/public_nboct00.hcsp (accessed June 15, 2007).
35.
Sherwyn, David, Zev J. Eigen, and Adam Klausner.2000. Interpreting the ADA and civil rights law. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly41 (1): 85-93.
36.
State of New York Attorney General.2004. Spitzer agreement to make websites accessible to the blind and visually impaired . http://www.oag.sate.ny.us/press/2004/aug/aug19a_04.html .
37.
Tsai, Michael.1998. The personal computing paradigm. www.atpm.com/4.12/page7.html.
38.
U.S. Department of Justice.1996. Policy statement on website accessibility for the visually-impaired. http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/foia/tal712.txt.
39.
Web Accessibility Network for Australian Universities.2005. Australian university websites: Addressing challenges and barriers to accessibility compliance. June 21. http://www.wanau.org/resources/barriers.html (accessed June 14, 2007).
40.
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C).1999. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/#toc.
41.
Williams, R., R. Rattray, and A. Grimes.2006. Meeting the on-line needs of disabled tourists: An assessment of UK-based hotel websites. International Journal of Tourism Research8:59-73.
