This pictorial review presents basic principles of the types of hardware extraction commonly encountered in foot and ankle surgical practice. We review the indications, contraindications and complications of hardware removal including pain, intra-articular fixation, and carcinogenesis, as well as special considerations in pediatric patients and in the setting of infection. Figures are then used to describe the appropriate techniques for use of the screwdriver shafts, conical extraction screws, extraction bolts, hollow reamers, and other instruments found in most hardware extraction sets.
Levels of Evidence: Therapeutic, Level V: Expert opinion
RutkowIM. Orthopaedic operations in the United States, 1979 through 1983. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68:716-719.
2.
JacobsenSHonnensdeLichtenbergMJensenCMTorholmC. Removal of internal fixation—the effect on patients’ complaints: a study of 66 cases of removal of internal fixation after malleolar fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15:170-171.
3.
WilliamsAAWittenDMDuesterRChauLB. The benefits of implant removal from the foot and ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:1316-1320.
4.
BrownOLDirschlDRObremskeyWT. Incidence of hardware-related pain and its effect on functional outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2001;15:271-274.
5.
StavlasPRobertsCSXypnitosFNGiannoudisPV. The role of reduction and internal fixation of Lisfranc fracture-dislocations: a systemic review of the literature. Int Orthop. 2010;34:1083-1091.
6.
RajapakseBEdwardsAHongT. A single surgeon’s experience of treatment of Lisfranc joint injuries. Injury. 2006;37:914-921.
7.
RammeltSSchneidersWSchikoreHHolchMHeineckJZwippH. Primary open reduction and fixation compared with delayed corrective arthrodesis in the treatment of tarsometatarsal (Lisfranc) fracture dislocation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1499-1506.
8.
KuoRSTejwaniNCDigiovaniCW. Outcome after open reduction and internal fixation of Lisfranc joint injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82-A:1608-1618.
9.
LyTVCoetzeeJC. Treatment of primarily ligamentous Lisfranc joint injuries: primary arthrodesis compared with open reduction and internal fixation. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:514-520.
10.
SchepersT. To retain or remove the syndesmotic screw: a review of the literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131:879-883.
11.
HamidNLoefflerBJBraddyWKellamJFCohenBEBosseMJ. Outcome after fixation of ankle fractures with an injury to the syndesmosis: the effect of the syndesmosis screw. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:1069-1073.
12.
ManjooASandersDTieszerCMacLeodMD. Functional and radiographic results of patients with syndesmotic screw fixation: implications for screw removal. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:2-6.
13.
MemoliVAUrbanRMAlroyJGalanteJO. Malignant neoplasms associated with orthopedic implant materials in rats. J Orthop Res. 1986;4:346-355.
14.
HughesAWSherlockDAHamblenDLReidR. Sarcoma at the site of a single hip screw: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69:470-472.
15.
PetersonHA. Metallic implant removal in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 2005;25:107-115.
16.
PettyWSpanierSShusterJSilverthorneC. The influence of skeletal implants on incidence of infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:1236-1244.
17.
SchmidtAHSwiontkowskiMF. Pathophysiology of infections after internal fixation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000;8:285-291.
18.
RightmireEZurakowskiDVrahasM. Acute infections after fracture repair: management with hardware in place. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:466-472.
19.
BerkesMObremskeyWScannellBEllingtonKHymesRBosseM. Maintenance of hardware after early postoperative infection following fracture internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:823-828.
20.
SandersonPLRyanWTurnerPG. Complications of metalwork removal. Injury. 1992;23:29-30.
