Background. Subtalar arthroereisis (SA) has been a procedure used for the correction of painful flexible flatfoot deformity in adults and children. Clinical studies of patients who had a SA are sparse and with mixed results and variable indications. The purpose of this study was to determine the current practice among orthopaedic foot and ankle specialists regarding SA. Methods. Web-based questionnaires were e-mailed to members of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS). Requested information included demographics and practice patterns in regard to performing SA surgery. A total of 572 respondents completed the survey (32% response rate). Results. A total of 273 respondents (48%) have performed SA. Of this group, 187 respondents (69%) still perform this procedure (33% of total respondents currently perform SA). Of the respondents, 401 (70%) practice in the United States, 40% have performed SA, and 60% of those still perform this procedure. Of non-US respondents, 66% have performed SA, and 80% of those still perform it. The most common US indications are painful congenital flatfoot, posterior tibial tendon dysfunction, and flatfoot associated with accessory navicular. Conclusion. Many doctors have performed SA, and a significant number no longer perform this procedure for various reasons. A greater percentage of non-US practitioners have performed and continue to perform SA than their counterparts in the United States. There is a common list of surgical indications. Most doctors who still perform this procedure have removed the implants, commonly for pain. SA is still being performed in the United States and throughout the world.
MetcalfeSABowlingFLReevesND. Subtalar joint arthroereisis in the management of pediatric flexible flatfoot: a critical review of the literature. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32:1127-1139.
2.
NeedlemanRL. Current topic review: subtalar arthroereisis for the correction of flexible flatfoot. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26:336-346.
3.
SchonLC. Subtalar arthroereisis: a new exploration of an old concept. Foot Ankle Clin. 2007;12:329-339.
4.
GriceDS. An extra-articular arthrodesis of the subastragalar joint for correction of paralytic flat feet in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1952;34:927-940.
5.
HaraldssonS. Operative treatment of pes planovalgus staticus juvinilis. Acta Orthop Scand. 1962;32:492-498.
6.
VoglerH. Subtalar joint blocking operations for pathological pronation syndromes. In: SoutherlandJAlderDBobergJ, eds. McGlamry’s Comprehensive Textbook of Foot Surgery. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins; 1987:466-482.
7.
NeedlemanRL. A surgical approach for flexible flatfeet in adults including a subtalar arthroereisis with the MBA sinus tarsi implant. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27:9-18.
8.
SmithS. The STA operation for the pronated foot in childhood. Clinics in Podiatry. 1984;1(1):165-173.
9.
SmithSMillarE. Arthroereisis by means of a subtalar polyethylene peg implant for correction of hindfoot pronation in children. Clin Orthop. 1983;181:15-23.
10.
LangfordJHBozofHHorowitzBD. Subtalar arthroereisis: Valente procedure. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1987;4:153-161.
JohnsonJEKleinSEPutnamRM. Corticosteroid injections in the treatment of foot & ankle disorders: an AOFAS survey. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32:394-399.
13.
MagnanBBaldrighiCPapadiaD. Flatfeet comparison of surgical techniques: result of study group into retrograde endorthesis with calcaneus-stop. Ital J Ped Orthop. 1997;13:28-33.
14.
RothSSestanBTudorAOstojicZSassoA. Minimally invasive calcaneo-stop method for idiopathic, flexible pes planicalgus in children. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28:991-995.
