Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objectives:

The presented systematic review explores the empirical studies regarding environmental design strategies that support adaptive behaviors while improving problem behaviors of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD).

Background:

People with IDD perceive and interact with their environment differently from people without disabilities. Design research has not always considered these differences, and environmental design solutions are not commonly found.

Methods:

The review process followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocols. The study reports the findings from the systematic review of 32 peer-reviewed studies published in EBSCO, ERIC, ProQuest, PsycINFO, MEDLINE CINAHL, Consumer Health Complete (EBSCOhost), and Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection between 1990 and 2020. In addition, quality assessment tools appraised the study’s quality.

Results:

The review identified 26 design strategies. Five themes qualitatively organized these environmental attributes: coherence, affordance, control, stimulation, and restoration.

Conclusion:

The evidence indicates that adequately designed physical environments can support the adaptive behaviors of people with IDD while alleviating behavioral problems. Design features not supported by strong empirical evidence should be further addressed in future studies.

Keywords

environmental design intellectual and developmental disabilities evidence-based practice evidence-based design systematic review

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Achenbach

T. M.

(2009). The Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA): Development, findings, theory, and applications. University of Vermont.

Ahrentzen

Steele

(2009). Advancing full spectrum housing: Designing for adults with autism spectrum disorders. Arizona State University.

Assarroudi

Heshmati Nabavi

Armat

M. R.

Ebadi

Vaismoradi

(2018). Directed qualitative content analysis: the description and elaboration of its underpinning methods and data analysis process. Journal of Research in Nursing, 23(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987117741667

Audirac

(2008). Accessing transit as universal design. Journal of Planning Literature, 23(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412208318558

Beaver

(2011). Designing environments for children and adults on the Autism Spectrum. Good Autism Practice, 12, 7–15.

CASP. (2019). CASP checklist. https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/

Castell

L. M.

(2012). Adapting building design to access by individuals with intellectual disability. Construction Economics and Building, 8(1), 11–22. https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/index.php/AJCEB/article/view/2994

Castell

L. M.

(2017). The influence of building features on wayfinding by adults with intellectual disability: Towards achieving more inclusive building design [Doctoral dissertation]. Curtin University.

Cermak

Stein Duker

Williams

Dawson

Lane

Polido

(2015). Sensory adapted dental environments to enhance oral care for children with autism spectrum disorders: A randomized controlled pilot study. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 45(9), 2876–2888. https://doi.org/10.0.3.239/s10803-015-2450-5

10.

Courbois

Blades

Farran

E. K.

Sockeel

(2013). Do individuals with intellectual disability select appropriate objects as landmarks when learning a new route? Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 57(1), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.0.4.87/j.1365-2788.2011.01518.x

11.

Creswell

J. W.

Plano Clark

V. L.

Gutmann

M. L.

Hanson

W. E.

(2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, 209(240), 209–240.

12.

Deochand

Conway

A. A.

Fuqua

R. W.

(2015). Design considerations for an intensive autism treatment centre. Support for Learning, 30(4), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.0.4.87/1467-9604.12103

13.

Effective Public Health Practice Project. (1998). Quality assessment tool for quantitative studies. https://www.nccmt.ca/knowledge-repositories/search/14

14.

Gaines

Bourne

Pearson

Kleibrink

(2016). Designing for autism spectrum disorders. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315856872

15.

Gaines

K. S.

Curry

Shroyer

Amor

Lock

R. H.

(2014). The perceived effects of visual design and features on students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 31(4), 282–298. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44113088?casa_token=Dwq9MvNJQVoAAAAA:07FIa-FCnRNSpDOfwjaFB4HDCHN4SkF7qgag8OKnjGDdbFuVPkghenvvVhekpXCGY1iQOdsLt24_tVcM0tCOmBF316FkyKRCtWhuWEeOiDLyZvX0iOQ

16.

Gibson

J. J.

(2015). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Psychology Press Class Edition. ISBN 978-1-84872-577-5

17.

Hill

Trusler

Furniss

Lancioni

(2012). Effects of multisensory environments on stereotyped behaviours assessed as maintained by automatic reinforcement. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 25(6), 509–521. https://doi.org/10.0.4.87/j.1468-3148.2012.00697.x

18.

Hume

Odom

(2007). Effects of an individual work system on the independent functioning of students with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(6), 1166–1180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0260-5

19.

Khare

Mullick

(2009). Incorporating the behavioral dimension in designing inclusive learning environment for autism. Archnet-IJAR, 3(3), 45–64.

20.

Kinnealey

Pfeiffer

Miller

Roan

Shoener

Ellner

M. L.

(2012). Effect of classroom modification on attention and engagement of students with autism or dyspraxia. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66(5), 511–519. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2012.004010

21.

Lande

M. B.

Adams

Falkner

Waldstein

S. R.

Schwartz

G. J.

Szilagyi

P. G.

Wang

Palumbo

(2009). Parental assessments of internalizing and externalizing behavior and executive function in children with primary hypertension. Journal of Pediatrics, 154(2), 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.08.017

22.

Lotan

Gold

(2009). Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of individual intervention in the controlled multisensory environment (Snoezelen®) for individuals with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 34(3), 207–215. https://doi.org/10.0.4.56/13668250903080106

23.

Lowe

Gaudion

McGinley

Kew

(2014). Designing living environments with adults with autism. Tizard Learning Disability Review, 19(2), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLDR-01-2013-0002

24.

Malkin

(2008). A visual reference for evidence-based design. www.healthdesign.org.

25.

Marchi. (2013). Designing for adults with autism spectrum disorders: Optimized live.work.play.learn environments [Master’s thesis, Clemson University]. ProQuest Dissertations.

26.

McAllister

Maguire

(2012). Design considerations for the autism spectrum disorder-friendly Key Stage 1 classroom. Support for Learning, 27(3), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9604.2012.01525.x

27.

Moher

Liberati

Tetzlaff

Altman

D. G.

(2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

28.

Mostafa

(2008). An architecture for autism: Concepts of design intervention for the Autistic user. International Journal of Architectural Research, 2(1), 189–211.

29.

Mostafa

(2010). Housing adaptation for adults with autistic spectrum disorder. Open House International, 35(1), 37–48. https://ou-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_proquest864907880&context=PC&vid=OUNEW&&search_scope=default_scope&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=default_tab&query=any,contains,autism-friendlyenvironments,AND

30.

Mostafa

(2014). Architecture for autism: Autism ASPECTSS^TM in school design. International Journal of Architectural Research, 8(1), 143–158.

31.

Nagib

Williams

(2017). Toward an autism-friendly home environment. Housing Studies, 32(2), 140–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2016.1181719

32.

Odom

S. L.

Collet-Klingenberg

Rogers

S. J.

Hatton

D. D.

(2010). Evidence-based practices in interventions for children and youth with autism spectrum disorders. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 54(4), 275–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/10459881003785506

33.

Pfeiffer

Coster

Snethen

Derstine

Piller

Tucker

(2017). Caregivers’ perspectives on the sensory environment and participation in daily activities of children with autism spectrum disorder. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71(4), 7104220020p1–7104220028p9. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2017.021360

34.

Pierce

Spriggs

Gast

Luscre

(2013). Effects of visual activity schedules on independent classroom transitions for students with autism. International Journal of Disability, Development & Education, 60(3), 253–269. https://doi.org/10.0.4.56/1034912X.2013.812191

35.

Sackett

D. L.

Rosenberg

W. M. C.

Gray

J. A. M.

Haynes

R. B.

Richardson

W. S.

(1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. BMJ, 312(71), 71–72.

36.

Salmi

(2007). Identifying and evaluating critical environmental wayfinding factors for adults with intellectual disabilities. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.

37.

Sánchez

P. A.

Vázquez

F. S.

Serrano

L. A.

(2011). Autism and the built environment. Autism Spectrum Disorders-From Genes to Environment, 19, 363–380.

38.

Schilling

D. L.

Schwartz

I. S.

(2004). Alternative seating for young children with autism spectrum disorder: Effects on classroom behavior. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 34(4), 423–432. https://doi.org/10.0.3.255/B:JADD.0000037418.48587.f4

39.

Scott

(2009). Designing learning spaces for children on the autism spectrum. Good Autism Practice, 10(16), 36–51. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bild/gap/2009/00000010/00000001/art00007

40.

Slevin

Mcclelland

(1999). Multisensory environments: Are they therapeutic? A single-subject evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of a multisensory environment. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 8(1), 48–56. http://libraries.ou.edu/access.aspx?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&AN=10214169&site=ehost-live

41.

Steckler

McLeroy

K. R.

Goodman

R. M.

Bird

S. T.

McCormick

(1992). Toward integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: An introduction. Health Education Quarterly, 19(1), 1–8.

42.

Steele

Ahrentzen

(2015). At home with autism: Designing housing for the spectrum. Policy Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=tPzuCgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=Ahrentzen,+S.+%26+Steele,+K.+(2009).&ots=C40PxPSkmY&sig=cuy6vG006v_hBnnEnkLMaYdsp6Y

43.

Stoiber

K. C.

Purd

Klingbeil’

D. A.

(2016). Evidence-based practices. In Singh

N. N.

(Ed.), Handbook of evidence-based practices in intellectual and developmental disabilities (pp. 41–68). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26583-4

44.

Story

M. F.

Mueller

J. L.

Mace

R. L.

(1998). The universal design file: Designing for people of all ages & abilities. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED46055

45.

Tassé

M. J.

Balboni

(2021). Theories and measurement of adaptive behavior. In Glidden

L. M.

Abbeduto

McIntyre

L. L.

Tassé

M. J.

(Eds.), APA handbook of intellectual and developmental disabilities: Foundations (pp. 425–450). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000194-016

46.

Tassé

M. J.

Schalock

R. L.

Balboni

Bersani

H. (Hank)

Borthwick-Duffy

Spreat

Thissen

Widaman

K. F.

Zhang

(2017). Diagnostic adaptive behavior scale user’s manual. AAIDD.

47.

Thomas

B. H.

Ciliska

Dobbins

Micucci

(2004). A process for systematically reviewing the literature: Providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 1(3), 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-475X.2004.04006.x

48.

Vogel

C. L.

(2008). Classroom design for living and learning with autism. Autism Asperger’s Digest, 7(1), 30–39. http://www.designhub.it/cometa/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Classroom-Design-for-Living-and-Learning-with-Autism.doc

49.

Woodcock

Georgiou

Jackson

J. C.

Woolner

(2007). Designing a tailorable environment for children with autistic spectrum disorders. The Design Institute, Coventry School of Art and Design. https://www.academia.edu/1208830

50.

WWC. (2011). What works clearinghouse. U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/

51.

Yalon-Chamovitz

(2009). Invisible access needs of people with intellectual disabilities: A conceptual model of practice. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 47(5), 395–400. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-47.5.395

52.

Y. J.

Ellis

(2023). Associations between environmental factors and adaptive skills of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities in educational settings. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7(1), 100410.

53.

Yuill

Strieth

Roake

Aspden

Todd

(2007). Brief report: Designing a playground for children with autistic spectrum disorders—Effects on playful peer interactions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(6), 1192–1196. http://libraries.ou.edu/access.aspx?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&AN=17063401&site=ehost-live

54.

Zazzi

Faragher

(2018). ‘Visual clutter’ in the classroom: Voices of students with autism spectrum disorder. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 64(3), 212–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2018.1468619

55.

Zimring

C. M.

(1981). Stress and the designed environment. Journal of Social Issues, 37(1), 145–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1981.tb01061.x

Systematic Review on Environmental Design for Adaptive and Problem Behaviors of People With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Abstract

Objectives:

Background:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusion:

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References