Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background:

Evidence supports the use of images of nature scenes in healthcare settings to reduce stress and improve emotional well-being. However, the literature is diverse and provides no integrated system to identify nature scenes that provide most therapeutic benefit.

Objective:

The current study aimed to validate and extend results of a correlational study that found the Importance for Survival Scale (IFSS) useful for selecting generally preferred nature scenes with therapeutic potential.

Methods:

The correlational study that tested the usefulness of the IFSS and the current qualitative study were components of a larger mixed-methods study. For the current study, general community participants (N = 20 males, 20 females; mean age = 48 years) provided verbal responses to questions about thoughts and feelings associated with a selection of photographs of nature scenes. Data were analyzed using a content analysis approach.

Results:

Themes and detailed descriptors associated with preference for, and emotional response to, most- and least-liked nature scenes were produced. A proportion of those themes is directly related to the construct of Importance for Survival (IFS), whereas other themes are better explained by alternative theoretical perspectives.

Conclusions:

Results uphold the IFSS as an effective tool for identifying generally preferred nature scenes with restorative potential, and provide information about the relative importance of IFSS subscales that may be used to further develop and refine the IFSS, as well as guide selection of restorative nature scenes. Results also provide fine-scaled descriptive information about preference for and emotional response to nature scenes.

Keywords

nature scenes landscape images access to nature photographs healthcare settings scene preference restoration from stress emotional well-being psycho-evolutionary theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Appleton

. (1975). The experience of landscape. Wiley.

Bengtsson

. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001

Berto

(2014). The role of nature in coping with psycho-physiological stress: A literature review on restorativeness. Behavioral Sciences, 4, 394–409. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs4040394

Block

. (1961). The Q-sort method in personality assessment and psychiatric research. Charles C Thomas. https://doi.org/10.1037/13141-000

Bourassa

S. C

. (1990). A paradigm for landscape aesthetics. Environment and Behavior, 22(6), 787–812. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916590226004

Bratman

G. N.

Hamilton

J. P.

Daily

G. C.

(2012). The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1249, 118–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06400.x

Caplan

R. P.

(1994). Stress, anxiety, and depression in hospital consultants, general practitioners, and senior health service managers. British Medical Journal, 309, 1261–1263. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.309.6964.1261

Darwin

. (1872). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life (6th ed.). John Murray.

Dearden

. (1989). Societal landscape preferences: A pyramid of influences. In Dearden

Sadler

(Eds.), Landscape evaluation: Approaches and applications (pp. 41–63). Western Geographical Series.

10.

Dzidowska

Price

Butow

(2010). Identifying research priorities and research needs among health and research professionals in psycho-oncology. Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology, 6, 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-7563.2010.01318.x

11.

Faravelli

Pallanti

. (1989). Recent life events and panic disorder. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 146, 622–626. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.146.5.622

12.

Gbrich

. (2007). Qualitative data analysis: An introduction (1st ed.). Sage Publications.

13.

Grant

K. E.

Compas

B. E.

Thurm

A. E.

McMahon

S. D.

Gipson

P. Y.

(2004). Stressors and child and adolescent psychopathology: Measurement issues and prospective effects. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33(2), 412–425. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3302_23

14.

Hammen

(2005). Stress and depression. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 293–319. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143938

15.

Han

K. T

. (2010). An exploration of relationships among responses to natural scenes: Scenic beauty, preference and restoration. Environment and Behavior, 42, 243–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916509333875

16.

Henry

J. D.

Crawford

J. R.

(2005). The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): Construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. The British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466505X29657

17.

Herzog

T. R.

Maguire

C. P.

Nebel

M. B

. (2003). Assessing the restorative components of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-4944(02)00113–5

18.

Krippendorff

. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Sage.

19.

Lovibond

S. H.

Lovibond

P. F

. (1995). Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales (2nd ed.). Psychology Foundation.

20.

Marcus

C. C.

Sachs

N. A

. (2014). Therapeutic landscapes: An evidence-based approach to designing healing gardens and restorative outdoor spaces. Wiley.

21.

Orians

G. H.

Heerwagen

J. H.

(1992). Evolved responses to landscapes. In Barkow

J. H.

Cosmides

Tooby

(Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 555–579). Oxford University Press.

22.

Patton

M. Q.

(2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative Social Work, 1(3), 261–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325002001003636

23.

Shaughnessy

J. J.

Zechmeister

E. B.

Zechmeister

J. S.

(2003). Research methods in psychology. (6th ed.). McGraw Hill.

24.

Thake

C. L.

Bambling

Edirippulige

Marx

. (2017). A psychoevolutionary approach to identifying preferred nature scenes with potential to provide restoration from stress. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 5, 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586717705085

25.

Ulrich

R. S

. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In Altman

Wohlwill

J. F.

(Eds.), Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 85–125). Plenum Press.

26.

Ulrich

R. S.

(1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224, 420–421. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6143402

27.

Ulrich

R. S.

Simons

R. F.

Losito

B. D.

Fiorito

Miles

M. A.

Zelson

(1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 201–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7

28.

van den Burg

A. E.

Koole

S. L.

van der Wulp

N. Y.

(2003). Environmental preference and restoration: (How) are they related? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-4944(02)00111-1

29.

Van Praag

H. M.

(2005). Can stress cause depression? The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry, 6(2), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15622970510030018

30.

Velarde

M. D.

Fry

Tveit

M. S.

(2007). Health effects of viewing landscapes—Landscape types in environmental psychology. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6(4), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2007.07.001

31.

Vincent

Battisto

Grimes

(2010). The effects of presence and influence in nature images in a simulated hospital patient room. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 3(3), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/193758671000300306

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

0.01 MB

0.02 MB

0.29 MB

0.30 MB

Using the Importance for Survival Scale to Identify Preferred Nature Scenes With Restorative Potential: A Qualitative Study

Abstract

Background:

Objective:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusions:

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material