The Conceptualization of the Natural Environment in Healthcare Facilities: A Scoping Review

Abstract

Objectives:

To identify how the natural environment (NE) in healthcare has been conceptualized.

Background:

The NE appears to afford significant therapeutic benefits. A clear concept of the NE in healthcare affords a shared understanding from which to advance science to facilitate comparisons across contexts. In this article, the various meanings of the NE were brought together into one framework by which to map its themes and their relationships.

Method:

A scoping review was conducted using database searches in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Cochrane for articles published up to July 2018. The bibliography of the included articles were manually searched for published books.

Results:

This review includes 137 peer-reviewed articles and research-based books from 27 countries. A conceptual framework was developed to identify five themes that conceptualize the NE in healthcare: (1) definitions of the NE in healthcare, (2) processes of the NE in healthcare, (3) usages of the NE in healthcare, (4) opinions about the NE in healthcare, and (5) NE’s impacts on health and work outcomes in healthcare. These themes are filtered by the NE’s physical and programmatic designs; changes in one affect the others. Definitions of the NE are described as human-made space, located in the indoors and outdoors, containing elements of nature and designed with the purpose to positively influence humans. Processes are described as the participatory approach in NE's development and its therapeutic goals. Usages are categorized into nature contact, frequency of usage, and accessibility. Opinions are accounted for by perceptions, preference, and satisfaction. Outcomes are related to physical health, mental health and well-being and work.

Conclusions:

This framework contributes to the conceptual discussion and emphasizes NE’s complementarity to the biomedical healthcare system.

Keywords

access to nature gardens daylight evidence-based design conceptual planning

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anåker

Heylighen

Nordin

Elf

(2017). Design quality in the context of healthcare environments: A scoping review. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 10(4), 136–150.

Arksey

O’Malley

(2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32.

Carpman

J. R.

Grant

M. A.

(2016). Design that cares: Planning health facilities for patients and visitors (Vol. 142). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

Cervinka

Röderer

Hämmerle

(2014). Evaluation of hospital gardens and implications for design: Benefits from environmental psychology for architecture and landscape planning. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 31(1), 43–56.

Chambliss

D. F.

Schutt

R. K.

(2018). Making sense of the social world: Methods of investigation. Sage Publications.

Chen

Y. M.

J. Y.

(2015). Effects of horticultural therapy on psychosocial health in older nursing home residents: A preliminary study. Journal of Nursing Research, 23(3), 167–171.

Cohen-Mansfield

Werner

(1999). Outdoor wandering parks for persons with dementia: A survey of characteristics and use. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 13(2), 109–117.

Cooper Marcus

(2007). Alzheimer’s garden audit tool. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 21(1-2), 179–191.

Cooper Marcus

Barnes

(1999). Healing gardens: Therapeutic benefits and design recommendations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

10.

Cooper Marcus

Sachs

N. A.

(2014). Therapeutic landscapes: An evidence-based approach to designing healing gardens and restorative outdoor spaces. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

11.

Cutler

L. J.

Kane

R. A.

(2005). As great as all outdoors: A study of outdoor spaces as a neglected resource for nursing home residents. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 19(3/4), 29–48.

12.

Dahlkvist

Hartig

Nilsson

Hogberg

Skovdahl

Engstrom

(2016). Garden greenery and the health of older people in residential care facilities: A multi-level cross-sectional study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(9), 2065–2076.

13.

Frumkin

Bratman

G. N.

Breslow

S. J.

Cochran

Kahn

P. H.

Jr. Lawler

J. J.

… Wood

S. A.

(2017). Nature contact and human health: A research agenda. Environ Health Perspect, 125(7), 075001.

14.

Gerlach-Spriggs

Kaufman

R. E.

Warner

S. B.

(1998). Restorative gardens: The healing landscape. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

15.

Hsieh

H. F.

Shannon

S. E.

(2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.

16.

Kaplan

Wendt

J. S.

(1972). Rated preference and complexity for natural and urban visual material. Perception & Psychophysics, 12(4), 354–356.

17.

Kaplan

(1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

18.

Kellert

S. R.

Wilson

E. O.

(1993). The Biophilia hypothesis. Washington, D.C: Island Press.

19.

Kopec

D. A.

(2018). Environmental psychology for design (3rd ed.). New York: Fairchild.

20.

Nejati

Shepley

Rodiek

Lee

Varni

(2016). Restorative design features for hospital staff break areas: A multi-method study. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 9(2), 16–35.

21.

Y. A.

Park

S. A.

Ahn

B. E.

(2018). Assessment of the psychopathological effects of a horticultural therapy program in patients with schizophrenia. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 36, 54–58.

22.

Pati

(2011). A framework for evaluating evidence in evidence-based design. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 4(3), 50–71.

23.

Peters

M. D. J.

Godfrey

C. M.

Khalil

McInerney

Parker

Soares

C. B.

(2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 141–146.

24.

Potter

Sheehan

Cain

Griffin

Jennings

P. A.

(2018). The impact of the physical environment on depressive symptoms of older residents living in care homes: A mixed methods study. Gerontologist, 58(3), 438–447.

25.

Rodiek

Nejati

Bardenhagen

Lee

Senes

(2016). The seniors’ outdoor survey: An observational tool for assessing outdoor environments at long-term care settings. Gerontologist, 56(2), 222–233.

26.

Rodiek

Schwarz

(2008). Outdoor Environments for People with Dementia. New York: Routledge.

27.

Sambrook

P. N.

Cameron

I. D.

Chen

J. S.

Cumming

R. G.

Durvasula

Herrmann

… Simpson

J. M.

(2011). Does increased sunlight exposure work as a strategy to improve vitamin D status in the elderly: A cluster randomised controlled trial. Osteoporosis International, 1–10.

28.

Salonen

Lahtinen

Lappalainen

Nevala

Knibbs

L. D.

Morawska

Reijula

(2013). Physical characteristics of the indoor environment that affect health and wellbeing in healthcare facilities: A review. Intelligent Buildings International, 5(1), 3–25.

29.

Stichler

J. F.

(2016). Research, research-informed design, evidence-based design: What is the difference and does it matter? Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 10(1), 7–12.

30.

Stichler

J. F.

(2018). Ensuring shared understanding: Defining and analyzing concepts. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 11(3), 6–10.

31.

Tyson

M. M.

(1998). The healing landscape: Therapeutic outdoor environments. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

32.

Ulrich

R. S.

(1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224(4647), 420–421.

33.

Ulrich

(1997). A theory of supportive design for healthcare facilities. Journal of healthcare design: Proceedings from the…Symposium on Healthcare Design. Symposium on Healthcare Design, 9, 3-7; discussion 21.

34.

Ulrich

R. S.

(1999). Effects of gardens on health outcomes: Theory and research. In Cooper Marcus

Barnes

(Eds.), Healing gardens (pp. 27–86). New York: Wiley.

35.

Walker

L. O.

Avant

K. C.

(2005). Strategies for theory construction in nursing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

36.

Walker

L. O.

Avant

K. C.

(2011). Strategies for theory construction in nursing. Boston, MA: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

37.

Wildridge

Bell

(2002). How CLIP became ECLIPSE: A mnemonic to assist in searching for health policy/management information. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 19(2), 113–115.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.77 MB

0.38 MB

0.77 MB